On Jun 22, 2016 7:54 PM, "Barry Warsaw" wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> >This seems to be more common now that command-line invocation is
> >becoming even more discouraged. When the upstream documentation
> >recommends ‘python3 -m foo.bar’ as the primary means of inv
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Tristan Seligmann
> wrote:
>> With my upstream developer hat on: source packages on PyPI are meant for end
>> users to install via pip. They often include generated artifacts, and don't
>> include things that
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, December 31, 2015 08:31:31 AM Ian Cordasco wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I would like to join the debian-python team. I have read the policy at
>>
>> https://python-modules.alioth.debi
Hi everyone,
I would like to join the debian-python team. I have read the policy at
https://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/python-modules-policy.html
and accept it.
My Alioth account is sigmavirus24-guest.
I would like to join the team to help package and maintain
python-betamax (ITP
https
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2015, at 08:47 PM, Brian May wrote:
>
>>in one case this is because upstream have only supplied a *.whl
>>file on Pypi.
>
> I'm *really* hoping that the PyPA will prohibit binary wheel-only uploads.
I'm not sure why they should pro
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Oct 06, 2015, at 07:05 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>>Interesting. It's the first time I hear about it, I thought it was just
>>closed source.
>
> The instance at gitlab.com is the non-free Enterprise Edition (EE). EE has
> features we proba
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2015-10-06 09:28:56 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Master != kilo. It still means that I have to do all of the backport
>> work by myself.
> [...]
>> I know that it's the common assumption that, as the package maintainer
>> in Deb
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> On mer. 30 sept. 2015 à 23:13:26, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>> [Thomas Goirand, 2015-09-30]
>> > Piotr decided to remove me from the Python team.
>>
>> DPMT and PAPT to be precise, yes
>>
>> > is an over reaction and that it should be rev
On Jul 9, 2015 5:25 AM, "Robert Collins" wrote:
>
> On 3 July 2015 at 08:29, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> > I think dropping these duplicates is the only thing that makes sense.
For
> > reference, I dropped python3-ipaddr once python3.2 was gone (because
3.3 has
> > ipaddress, which does the same t
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> On 3 July 2015 at 11:44, Ian Cordasco wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Ben Finney
>> wrote:
>>> Barry Warsaw writes:
>>>
>>>> […] there's actually no reason to have a Python 3
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Barry Warsaw writes:
>
>> […] there's actually no reason to have a Python 3 version of enum in
>> any version >= Python 3.4. […]
>
> Ian Cordasco writes:
>
>> Probably a silly question, but are oth
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> As part of the 3.5 test rebuild I noticed an incompatibility with
> python3-enum, which I reported upstream. The response was: there's actually
> no reason to have a Python 3 version of enum in any version >= Python 3.4.
> Since that's all we
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Tristan Seligmann
wrote:
> On 22 May 2015 at 16:06, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
>> Or are you saying that the ipaddress backport is not compatible with
>> python3 stdlib's ipaddress? (This would be a very unfortunate state of
>> affairs, but impossible to imagine)
>
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Daniele Tricoli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have uploaded version 2.7.0 of requests in experimental because it breaks
> backwards compatibility.
>
> I already found that httpie needs to be update to 0.9.2[¹], but I'll start
> checking all requests dependants in the foll
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Paul Tagliamonte
wrote:
> Heyya d-p,
>
> I'd like to send an email to d-d-a asking that project to consider no
> longer creating new Debian tools in Python 2.
>
> I'd like this to have the endorsement of the team, so, does anyone object
> to
> me asking people to
15 matches
Mail list logo
