Re: Streamlining the use of Salsa CI on team packages

2019-09-16 Thread Marcin Kulisz
On 15 September 2019 23:01:46 BST, Thomas Goirand  wrote:

snip

>This tells "instance_type: g1-small", which doesn't match any name at:
>https://cloud.google.com/compute/vm-instance-pricing
>
>Am I right that this is n1-standard-1, which is 1 VCPU and 3.75 GB?

Nop, this is incorrect you're looking for this
https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/machine-types#sharedcore

snip

>Since we're talking about the smallest type of instance possible at
>google, then other people may have experience the lack of RAM for sure.

g1-small are not the smallest but problem with them is that those are shared 
CPU with 1.7GB of ram.

I agree that this is not suitable for heavy build packages.

I personally would hope that packages build by salsa are throw away and are 
just for testing then source is uploaded and they are rebuild by buildd's in 
such case there would be no need for root or any other heavy handed management 
of those.
But as some people already stated there is not much info from salsa team about 
their plans in this regard.



Re: Calling all git-loving Pythonistas

2014-09-03 Thread Marcin Kulisz
On 2014-09-02 16:10:35, Barry Warsaw wrote:

Snip

> Some of the things we're now trying to decide include which of the various
> popular regimes to adopt, e.g. gbp-pq, git-dpm, or dgit.  Other topics of
> discussion are outlined in Stefano's summary of the DC14 conversations:

Hi all,
Barry I see you're in favour of dgit but there is one problem with it (at least
was last time I checked) it's not going to work for people who aren't DDs and
this should be kept in mind if you want to attract none DDs to join DPMT or/and
PAPT.

Just my 5p.

BTW I'm not subscribed to debian-python@l.d.o
-- 

|_|0|_|  |
|_|_|0| "Heghlu'Meh QaQ jajVam"  |
|0|0|0|  kuLa -  |

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x58C338B3
3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD  58C3 38B3


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature