On Wednesday 11 September 2002 15:00, Matthias Klose wrote:
Neil Schemenauer writes:
Matthias Klose wrote:
Moshe Zadka writes:
I was wondering if you mind passing Python 1.5 maintainership to me.
I do not mind passing the maintainership, but I do mind keeping it in
unstable.
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 15:09, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On Sep 10, Matthias Klose wrote:
Moshe Zadka writes:
I was wondering if you mind passing Python 1.5 maintainership to me.
I do not mind passing the maintainership, but I do mind keeping it in
unstable. Debian is not a museum for
Converting a hack to another hack with no strong reason nor fun is not
exactly what I dream of every night.
So, I am not sure that such a conversion would be worth the time spent.
If despite all of this you still want to tackle on this task and have
some ELisp questions (I think it should
On 26-Jun-2002 Florent Rougon wrote:
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is we now have a piece of a fairly common package using
script(s) in a language few understand. So if you get hit by a bus
someone WILL have to reverse engineer that script. This is the same
Converting a hack to another hack with no strong reason nor fun is not
exactly what I dream of every night.
So, I am not sure that such a conversion would be worth the time spent.
If despite all of this you still want to tackle on this task and have
some ELisp questions (I think it should
making python-jabber2.{1,2} would let it, but is it the correct way?
if you want to support multiple python versions, yes. You could also make a
python-jabber package which depended on the newest python version you support.
That way a user can just use python-jabber and let the upgrades
On 06-Apr-2002 Jérôme Marant wrote:
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://people.debian.org/~jerome/python-4suite
the source is 600 so we can not download it.
My apologies. It is strange that scp copied them all 644 except from
this one. Fixed now.
Will get a few
4suite is obviously updating the python search path to add its modules, the
modules should be added at the front of the list and not the end where they
seem to be added.
This really sucks. I don't have in mind any package that requires the
removal
of the old version in order to build.
I put it at:
http://people.debian.org/~jerome/python-4suite
The package is now compatible with python-xml. Please test it. If
you think that is is reliable enough, I'll upload it and will be
able to close #128604, at last.
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
PS: I'm not
On 05-Apr-2002 Jérôme Marant wrote:
Hi,
I've just built a preversion of the 4suite 0.12a2 snapshot.
Building the package takes a huge amount of time (the whole
documentation is processed with 4xslt, which is known as one of the
slowest XSLT processors) and packaging becomes more
On 20-Feb-2002 dman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 07:57:52AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
|
| What do you have against giving the user optimizations?
|
| Absolutely nothing, but I don't see why this needs to be done outside of
| the package management system.
|
| I fail to see why
They should be known by dpkg because they're part of the package. It's
impossible to support more than just the currently installed versions anyway.
Once a new version of python is added, the package will still need to be
updated or at least reinstalled to compile the modules for the new
On 08-Feb-2002 Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
hi,
hi have python-psycopg be a fake package that depends on the right
python-psycopg package (i provide psycopg packages for python 1.5, 2.1
and 2.2.) lintian give me an error saying that the package should
contain at least the copyright file.
On 10-Jan-2002 Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
Hi Python folks,
I have put together a dh_purepython debhelper script to help
the installation of pure Python packages.
Still missing:
1) All Python X.Y versions need to be preinstalled. What happens
when you install an new Python version?
On 15-Dec-2001 Carel Fellinger wrote:
Hi,
Today I tried the new Python2.2c1 to find that it doesn't build on potato.
It works out of the box on my woody system, but fails on my potato setup:(
The latest 2.2 that does build under potato is 2.2.a4
It seems to have to do with changes in the
I have filed an ITP for pyAda which is an Ada wrapper to allow Python to be
embedded and extended with Ada. Since pyada contains no python code I was
going to name the package pyada instead of python-pyada, or am I wrong
about the usage of 'python-' in a package name.
pyAda is the well
On 28-Feb-2001 Jérôme Marant wrote:
Hi,
Would you think great to have 4Suite (http://www.4suite.org) in Debian ?
As 4DOM was included in Python-xml, we could simply remove it from 4Suite
add a dependency instead.
I looked into packaging it for narval. However, the version of xml
none; both packages should depend on python|python2
I am just waiting till python2 packages stabilise to upload
versions with correct dependencies.
But, of course, the correct way would be to have
virtual package python, provided by python1-base and python2-base
it is my understanding
18 matches
Mail list logo
