Re: Request to join DPT

2024-04-03 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Hi Jakob, Jakob Haufe wrote on 27/03/2024 at 11:43:55+0200: > Hi all, > > I recently adopted intelhex[1] and would like to continue maintaining > it in the repo under the DPT group. > > My salsa username is sur5r[2]. > > I have read the policy[3] and accept it. > > Cheers, > sur5r > > [1]

Request to join DPT

2024-03-27 Thread Jakob Haufe
Hi all, I recently adopted intelhex[1] and would like to continue maintaining it in the repo under the DPT group. My salsa username is sur5r[2]. I have read the policy[3] and accept it. Cheers, sur5r [1] https://bugs.debian.org/976074 [2] https://salsa.debian.org/sur5r [3]

Re: Request to Join DPT

2021-03-26 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, sorry for waiting and welcome :) ne 21. 2. 2021 v 12:57 odesílatel Lorenz Schori napsal: > Hi, > > I am the author of Prometheus PVE Exporter[1]. I recently discovered > that there is only one somewhat exotic dependency left (proxmoxer[2]) > which needs some love before Prometheus PVE

Re: Updating proxmoxer [Was: Re: Request to Join DPT]

2021-03-19 Thread Lorenz Schori
Hi Elena, On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:41:41 +0100 Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: > Yes, please, a merge request would help: I've looked into it a few > times already and wasn't able to finish it in the time I had. > > But since it's going into experimental, wouldn't it be better to > package the

Re: Updating proxmoxer [Was: Re: Request to Join DPT]

2021-03-11 Thread Elena ``of Valhalla''
On 2021-02-24 at 18:53:19 +0100, Lorenz Schori wrote: > > Version 1.0.4 has some small fixes for the ssh backend and some > > improvements for the http backend. Nothing major though. If it is > > viable to include that in bullseye, then why not. Also note that > > upstream changed to

Re: Updating proxmoxer [Was: Re: Request to Join DPT]

2021-02-24 Thread Lorenz Schori
Hi, On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 17:50:43 +0100 Lorenz Schori wrote: > Version 1.0.4 has some small fixes for the ssh backend and some > improvements for the http backend. Nothing major though. If it is > viable to include that in bullseye, then why not. Also note that > upstream changed to

Re: Updating proxmoxer [Was: Re: Request to Join DPT]

2021-02-21 Thread Lorenz Schori
Hi Elena, On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 16:37:54 +0100 Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: > [...] > Have you already checked how significant the difference is? I suspect > that the delta would be too much to be reasonable even under the > current freeze rules (and Prometheus PVE Exporter as a new package >

Updating proxmoxer [Was: Re: Request to Join DPT]

2021-02-21 Thread Elena ``of Valhalla''
On 2021-02-21 at 12:50:16 +0100, Lorenz Schori wrote: > I am the author of Prometheus PVE Exporter[1]. I recently discovered > that there is only one somewhat exotic dependency left (proxmoxer[2]) > which needs some love before Prometheus PVE Exporter itself could be > packaged for Debian. I'd

Request to Join DPT

2021-02-21 Thread Lorenz Schori
Hi, I am the author of Prometheus PVE Exporter[1]. I recently discovered that there is only one somewhat exotic dependency left (proxmoxer[2]) which needs some love before Prometheus PVE Exporter itself could be packaged for Debian. I'd like to bring that dependency up-to-date in a first step and