Re: Ongoing Python Transition: related FTBFSes

2010-01-29 Thread Luca Falavigna
Simon McVittie ha scritto: > ... and for those who care about FTBFSs, the binNMUs of pygtk are also all > failing (either due to #548211 or not waiting for python2.6-gobject to be > available), which could stall this transition fairly badly. I'm sure the GNOME > team would appreciate help with that

Re: Ongoing Python Transition: related FTBFSes

2010-01-29 Thread Torsten Marek
Am Donnerstag, den 28.01.2010, 07:10 -0500 schrieb Scott Kitterman: > > Scott Kitterman (17/12/2009): > >> I believe that we are getting close to uploading Python 2.6 to > >> Unstable and dropping Python 2.4 as a supported Python version. If > >> we finish preparations in the next week, are there

Re: Ongoing Python Transition: related FTBFSes

2010-01-28 Thread Luk Claes
Matthias Klose wrote: > On 28.01.2010 12:50, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Scott Kitterman (17/12/2009): >>> I believe that we are getting close to uploading Python 2.6 to >>> Unstable and dropping Python 2.4 as a supported Python version. If >>> we finish preparations in the next week, are there any

Re: Ongoing Python Transition: related FTBFSes

2010-01-28 Thread Matthias Klose
On 28.01.2010 12:50, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Scott Kitterman (17/12/2009): I believe that we are getting close to uploading Python 2.6 to Unstable and dropping Python 2.4 as a supported Python version. If we finish preparations in the next week, are there any ongoing transitions a python2.6/pyt

Re: Ongoing Python Transition: related FTBFSes

2010-01-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
> Scott Kitterman (17/12/2009): >> I believe that we are getting close to uploading Python 2.6 to >> Unstable and dropping Python 2.4 as a supported Python version. If >> we finish preparations in the next week, are there any ongoing >> transitions a python2.6/python- defaults upload would entang

Re: Ongoing Python Transition: related FTBFSes

2010-01-28 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 at 12:50:24 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > FWIW, here are some FTBFSes I've reported lately, which look due to > this transition: [...] ... and for those who care about FTBFSs, the binNMUs of pygtk are also all failing (either due to #548211 or not waiting for python2.6-gobjec

Re: Ongoing Python Transition: related FTBFSes

2010-01-28 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Scott Kitterman (17/12/2009): > I believe that we are getting close to uploading Python 2.6 to > Unstable and dropping Python 2.4 as a supported Python version. If > we finish preparations in the next week, are there any ongoing > transitions a python2.6/python- defaults upload would entangle tha