On 05.11.18 10:32, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 05.11.18 09:17, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 21:09, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>
>>> Hi there!
>>>
>>> During Debconf, we decided we would not decide yet, and see in November
>>> if we think it's reasonable to allow Python 3.7 to
> No one in Debian (or Ubuntu) reported it.
That is hardly surprising, most Debian/Ubuntu users will be using the default
python3 version.
IMO (I am just a random dd) if Debian is going to switch the default python
version for buster it should be done ASAP to maximize the amount of testing
On 05.11.18 20:31, Jerome Kieffer wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:26:41 -0500
> Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>> I only found out about it due to an upstream bug report on OS X. No one in
>> Debian (or Ubuntu) reported it.
>
> I got one also in fabio:
> https://github.com/silx-kit/fabio/pull/243
>
On Monday, November 05, 2018 08:31:56 PM Jerome Kieffer wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:26:41 -0500
>
> Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I only found out about it due to an upstream bug report on OS X. No one
> > in
> > Debian (or Ubuntu) reported it.
>
> I got one also in fabio:
>
On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:26:41 -0500
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I only found out about it due to an upstream bug report on OS X. No one in
> Debian (or Ubuntu) reported it.
I got one also in fabio:
https://github.com/silx-kit/fabio/pull/243
Actually there has been a depreciation warning for ages
On Monday, November 05, 2018 05:31:36 PM Ondrej Novy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> po 5. 11. 2018 v 9:09 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal:
> > Do other fellow DD also think it's kind of ok to keep 3.7 in Buster?
>
> +1 for keeping 3.7 in Buster and switch defaults to 3.7.
I recently got burned by changes
Hi,
po 5. 11. 2018 v 9:09 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal:
> Do other fellow DD also think it's kind of ok to keep 3.7 in Buster?
>
+1 for keeping 3.7 in Buster and switch defaults to 3.7.
Thanks.
--
Best regards
Ondřej Nový
Email: n...@ondrej.org
PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090 3573
On 11/5/18 9:08 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> During Debconf, we decided we would not decide yet, and see in November
> if we think it's reasonable to allow Python 3.7 to reach Buster. Time
> has passed, RC bugs have been fixed, and now is probably the time to
> open this thread.
>
>
On 05.11.18 09:17, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 21:09, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> Hi there!
>>
>> During Debconf, we decided we would not decide yet, and see in November
>> if we think it's reasonable to allow Python 3.7 to reach Buster. Time
>> has passed, RC bugs have
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 21:09, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> During Debconf, we decided we would not decide yet, and see in November
> if we think it's reasonable to allow Python 3.7 to reach Buster. Time
> has passed, RC bugs have been fixed, and now is probably the time to
> open this
Hi there!
During Debconf, we decided we would not decide yet, and see in November
if we think it's reasonable to allow Python 3.7 to reach Buster. Time
has passed, RC bugs have been fixed, and now is probably the time to
open this thread.
To me, as much as the OpenStack packages are concerned,
11 matches
Mail list logo
