Re: RFS: Pyspread 0.2.6-1

2014-03-11 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Andreas Noteng andr...@noteng.no wrote: On 07. mars 2014 02:52, Vincent Cheng wrote: If there aren't any non-DFSG-compliant files in upstream's tarball (and I see nothing that would suggest that this file in particular is non-DFSG-compliant), please do not

Re: RFS: Pyspread 0.2.6-1

2014-03-08 Thread Andreas Noteng
On 07. mars 2014 02:52, Vincent Cheng wrote: If there aren't any non-DFSG-compliant files in upstream's tarball (and I see nothing that would suggest that this file in particular is non-DFSG-compliant), please do not repack upstream's tarball; it's simply not necessary at all. You can simply

Re: RFS: Pyspread 0.2.6-1

2014-03-06 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Andreas Noteng andr...@noteng.no wrote: On 17. feb. 2014 21:57, Andreas Noteng wrote: Requesting a review and upload of Pyspread 0.2.6-1 available in the papt repo. Package is lintian clean, but I'm unsure if I did the DEP-8 implementation correctly or if

Re: RFS: Pyspread 0.2.6-1

2014-03-03 Thread Andreas Noteng
On 17. feb. 2014 21:57, Andreas Noteng wrote: Requesting a review and upload of Pyspread 0.2.6-1 available in the papt repo. Package is lintian clean, but I'm unsure if I did the DEP-8 implementation correctly or if it's at all possible. Running the tests manually works just fine but with

Re: RFS: Pyspread 0.2.6-1

2014-02-25 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@debian.org wrote: On Feb 21, 2014, at 01:59 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@debian.org wrote: They don't run automatically during package build for either pbuilder or sbuild afaik, although that

Re: RFS: Pyspread 0.2.6-1

2014-02-25 Thread Andreas Noteng
On 25. feb. 2014 10:53, Vincent Cheng wrote: With regards to pyspread...given the discussion above, I don't think ttf-mscorefonts-installer even belongs in suggests? End users are usually the only ones that care about suggested packages, and they're not the ones who are going to be creating or

Re: RFS: Pyspread 0.2.6-1

2014-02-19 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Feb 18, 2014, at 09:10 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: I don't really know how autopkgtests work, but if they're run automatically during the build process like dh_auto_test, then that would cause your package to FTBFS. Can you modify the tests so that they work with other fonts, or disable the

Re: RFS: Pyspread 0.2.6-1

2014-02-19 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 19 February 2014 15:45, Barry Warsaw ba...@debian.org wrote: On Feb 18, 2014, at 09:10 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: I don't really know how autopkgtests work, but if they're run automatically during the build process like dh_auto_test, then that would cause your package to FTBFS. Can you modify

Re: RFS: Pyspread 0.2.6-1

2014-02-18 Thread Andreas Noteng
On 17. feb. 2014 23:26, Vincent Cheng wrote: ...A package in main must not depend or recommend a non-main package (in this case, ttf-mscorefonts-installer, which is in contrib). Refer to Policy 2.2.1. Thanks. I knew depend was not OK but believed recommends was. But, according to 2.2.1 suggests

Re: RFS: Pyspread 0.2.6-1

2014-02-18 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Andreas Noteng andr...@noteng.no wrote: On 17. feb. 2014 23:26, Vincent Cheng wrote: ...A package in main must not depend or recommend a non-main package (in this case, ttf-mscorefonts-installer, which is in contrib). Refer to Policy 2.2.1. Thanks. I knew

Re: RFS: Pyspread 0.2.6-1

2014-02-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Andreas Noteng wrote: Pyspread works just fine without ttf-mscorefonts-installer, so I guess suggests would be a better choice anyway. The tests will fail without the package though. Is it OK to include ttf-mscorefonts-installer as a test dependency in

RFS: Pyspread 0.2.6-1

2014-02-17 Thread Andreas Noteng
Requesting a review and upload of Pyspread 0.2.6-1 available in the papt repo. Package is lintian clean, but I'm unsure if I did the DEP-8 implementation correctly or if it's at all possible. Running the tests manually works just fine but with adt-run some of them fail Changes since last