On Thu, Sep 07 2017, Brian May wrote:
> In general, however, when something does go badly wrong I think it will be a
> lot easier to diagnose, understand, and fix with GPB PQ then with git-dpm.
> git-dpm can get very messy very quickly, particularly if you forget to pull
> before making changes (pe
On 2017-09-07 14:54, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> It's a wiki. The resolution of your annoyance is within your grasp.
I had already fixed it. Sorry if I didn't make this clear.
On Thursday, September 07, 2017 09:28:11 AM Brian May wrote:
> On 2017-09-07 08:42, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Conveniently, we already decided to switch:
> >
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ
>
> It was annoying me that these instructions were missing the last steps
> on how to s
On 2017-09-07 08:42, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Conveniently, we already decided to switch:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ
It was annoying me that these instructions were missing the last steps
on how to switch the default branch to debian/master and delete the old
branch.
The
On 2017-09-07 08:42, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Conveniently, we already decided to switch:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ
Worth noting, while there are some big gotchas with git-dpm, there are
also some big gotchas with GPB PQ. GPB PQ isn't a magical solution that
will solve al
On September 6, 2017 5:16:13 PM EDT, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 06 2017, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> But just to confirm, I see that statsmodels is just using
>>> git-buildpackage?
>>
>> Yes.
>
>Ok, that's reassuring. I'll have a look at the packaging, since I'm
>already on alioth.
>
>But sinc
On Wed, Sep 06 2017, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> But just to confirm, I see that statsmodels is just using
>> git-buildpackage?
>
> Yes.
Ok, that's reassuring. I'll have a look at the packaging, since I'm
already on alioth.
But since DPMT is CC-ed (I normally follow via gmane), I take the
occasion to
7 matches
Mail list logo
