* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2012-04-13, 20:24:
That said, I don't believe that forcibly changing the maintainer of
Python interpreter packages is the correct course of action. I'm not
personally happy with the way they are maintainer, but it's not
nearly as bad as to justify such action.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
You rather miss my point. Sorry for not being clear. The point isn't that
the current maintenance of the python interpreter packages is great.
at least we do agree on something ;)
It's
not. The point is whining
On Saturday, May 12, 2012 09:46:55 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com
wrote:
On Friday, April 13, 2012 08:37:26 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 23:35, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com
wrote:
On Thursday, April 12,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Friday, April 13, 2012 08:37:26 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 23:35, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 11:04:33 PM Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:36:58AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Allow me be blunt then: do we have volunteers to maintain the pythonX.Y
packages? Can those volunteers manifest themselves on this list?
snip
I understand there might be incompatibilities that make impossible for
potential
On Saturday, April 14, 2012 05:12:54 PM Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
times when the only 'solution' available is a short term hack that's
needed
for Ubuntu's time based release schedule that isn't appropriate to
Debian's
approach of doing
On Friday, April 13, 2012 08:37:26 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 23:35, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 11:04:33 PM Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 22:50, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com
wrote:
On Thursday, April 12,
* Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org, 2012-04-12, 11:25:
Allow me be blunt then: do we have volunteers to maintain the
pythonX.Y packages? Can those volunteers manifest themselves on this
list?
So, ~10 days later this call, we've two volunteers: Sandro and Barry.
If no one else show up,
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:36:58AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Allow me be blunt then: do we have volunteers to maintain the pythonX.Y
packages? Can those volunteers manifest themselves on this list?
So, ~10 days later this call, we've two volunteers: Sandro and Barry. If
no one else show
Il 03 aprile 2012 10:36, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org ha scritto:
If you volunteered in #573745 already, and you're still available,
please reiterate your availability here.
I'm willing to help too, but I would limit by doing grunt work such as
bug triaging and cleanup.
I know this kind
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 11:25:07 AM Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:36:58AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Allow me be blunt then: do we have volunteers to maintain the pythonX.Y
packages? Can those volunteers manifest themselves on this list?
So, ~10 days later
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:13:02AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I will be direct.
Thanks! I really appreciate.
So far, the solicitation has been for co-maintainers with morph. I think it
would only be fair to make a similar call for co-maintainers with doko.
... but hold right there :-)
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 16:13, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
I don't think that the *-defaults packages and the interpreter packages
fundamentally require the same maintainer, but I expect it to be problematic
to have different teams maintain them if each team has the other as a
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 09:12:23 PM Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 16:13, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
I don't think that the *-defaults packages and the interpreter packages
fundamentally require the same maintainer, but I expect it to be
problematic to have
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 16:36, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
clarifying what the incompatibilities among the (potential) volunteers
are.
From my side, I don't think i'll have problems working with Barry, but
I honestly have to say we had few occasions to work together (that I
can
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:20:04 PM Sandro Tosi wrote:
To give a (fresh) example and what I meant above, you can try to
answer this provocative question: Why Ubuntu has Python 2.7.3 since
more than 2 days (even before it was publicly announced) while Debian
is still stuck with a RC,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 22:50, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:20:04 PM Sandro Tosi wrote:
To give a (fresh) example and what I meant above, you can try to
answer this provocative question: Why Ubuntu has Python 2.7.3 since
more than 2 days (even
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 11:04:33 PM Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 22:50, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:20:04 PM Sandro Tosi wrote:
To give a (fresh) example and what I meant above, you can try to
answer this provocative question:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:36, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
Allow me be blunt then: do we have volunteers to maintain the pythonX.Y
packages? Can those volunteers manifest themselves on this list?
If you volunteered in #573745 already, and you're still available,
please
On Apr 03, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Allow me be blunt then: do we have volunteers to maintain the pythonX.Y
packages? Can those volunteers manifest themselves on this list?
Apologies for not responding sooner, I was off-line for a while.
I have no opinion on how the
Hi Stefano,
thanks for trying to push it forward.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:36, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
Allow me be blunt then: do we have volunteers to maintain the pythonX.Y
packages? Can those volunteers manifest themselves on this list?
If you volunteered in #573745
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org writes:
The idea I have of a team is a group of equals, where it doesn't exist a
master and a group of servants, where no-one has a veto on anything if
not for valid technical reasons, where no-one has to ask permission to
upload or to perform any other activities
22 matches
Mail list logo
