Re: Fwd: next version of csvkit

2017-04-02 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 1 avril 2017 19:42 -0400, Sandro Tosi  : >> It's not at all clear where [1] came from. The lintian changelog [3] does >> not >> give a bug reference and I couldn't find a bug. > > it's just a few lines down in the changelog: >

Re: Fwd: next version of csvkit

2017-04-02 Thread Chris Lamb
Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > On the current subject, I also agree we should not drop prematurely > > packages targeted to Python 2. The Lintian tag in question does not suggest maintainers should be removing existing Python 2 support from packages. It merely suggests that you should think twice

Re: Fwd: next version of csvkit

2017-04-02 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 2 avril 2017 10:21 +0100, Chris Lamb  : >> > On the current subject, I also agree we should not drop prematurely >> > packages targeted to Python 2. > > The Lintian tag in question does not suggest maintainers should be > removing existing Python 2 support from packages. > >

Re: Fwd: next version of csvkit

2017-04-02 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 2 avril 2017 09:45 +0100, Ghislain Vaillant  : >>> it's just a few lines down in the changelog: >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829744 (it is kinda >>> sad that there was no discussion with the python team from the lintian >>> maintainer before

Re: Fwd: next version of csvkit

2017-04-02 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 02/04/17 08:39, Vincent Bernat wrote: ❦ 1 avril 2017 19:42 -0400, Sandro Tosi : It's not at all clear where [1] came from. The lintian changelog [3] does not give a bug reference and I couldn't find a bug. it's just a few lines down in the changelog: