[Matthias Klose, 2018-05-17]
> PEP 394 [1] saw an update in April 2018 [2], the diffs at [3].
>
> The most important change from my point of view is
>
> -* It is suggested that even distribution-specific packages follow the
> - ``python2``/``python3`` convention, even in code that is not intende
On 18.05.2018 05:19, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Matthias Klose, 2018-05-17]
>> PEP 394 [1] saw an update in April 2018 [2], the diffs at [3].
>>
>> The most important change from my point of view is
>>
>> -* It is suggested that even distribution-specific packages follow the
>> - ``python2``/``pyth
Hello from the mini-DebConf in Hambug.
I've made some improvements to the Python packaging with gbp-pq wiki page.
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ
I've replaced all the references to alioth with instructions for Salsa.
Feel free to revert or correct any of my changes that you think
On Friday, May 18, 2018 11:31:37 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 18.05.2018 05:19, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > [Matthias Klose, 2018-05-17]
> >
> >> PEP 394 [1] saw an update in April 2018 [2], the diffs at [3].
> >>
> >> The most important change from my point of view is
> >>
> >> -* It is suggest
> who said, that we should rename packages? The only packages being dropped are
> the python defaults packages.
> >
> > I refuse to do that work!
>
> There is no work in renaming the packages. It's about the dependency
> generation
> and the shebang.
the work in dh-python is not trivial. The wo
On 18.05.2018 19:02, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>> who said, that we should rename packages? The only packages being dropped are
>> the python defaults packages.
>>>
>>> I refuse to do that work!
>>
>> There is no work in renaming the packages. It's about the dependency
>> generation
>> and the sheban
> A bit disappointed about this style of communication, Matthias
same here (you want us to do something without explaining reasons)
EOT for me.
--
GPG: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645
On 18.05.2018 18:14, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, May 18, 2018 11:31:37 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 18.05.2018 05:19, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>>> [Matthias Klose, 2018-05-17]
>>>
PEP 394 [1] saw an update in April 2018 [2], the diffs at [3].
The most important change from my
On 18.05.2018 19:24, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>> A bit disappointed about this style of communication, Matthias
>
> same here (you want us to do something without explaining reasons)
> EOT for me.
well, I thought I explained in the first message. The distro should get out of
the way of using the p
[Víctor Cuadrado Juan, 2018-05-17]
> > I maintain some packages in DPMT, such as:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python3-proselint
> > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-neovim
> > and I wanted to push changes to them.
> >
> > Could somebody add me to the followi
On Friday, May 18, 2018 07:29:19 PM Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 18.05.2018 18:14, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Friday, May 18, 2018 11:31:37 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> On 18.05.2018 05:19, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> >>> [Matthias Klose, 2018-05-17]
> >>>
> PEP 394 [1] saw an update in April
Matthias Klose wrote:
> The distro should get
> out of the way of using the python symlink, and giving users the freedom /
> choice what to do about the link.
I think I understand your rationale to stop shipping /usr/bin/python and
once the unversioned symlink disappears from use in Debian then a
12 matches
Mail list logo
