Bug#412839: openmotif is not autobuilt, misses several archs (ia64, mipsel, s390)

2008-07-22 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: according to a relatively high popcon stat and the fact that my package arb just depends from libmotif3 I tried to care a little bit for openmotif. So I added XS-Autobuild: yes to the debian/control header because I was not able to detect any reason

Bug#412839: openmotif is not autobuilt, misses several archs (ia64, mipsel, s390)

2008-07-22 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Done. Great! Many thanks for the quick response Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#491891: This package should not be released with lenny

2008-07-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Package: krecordmydesktop Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: npolsr-cleanup I think that package krecordmydesktop should not be released with lenny because: * It was not released with etch, meaning that its absence from the release most likely causes no regressions for

Bug#491892: This package should not be released with lenny

2008-07-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Package: hg-buildpackage Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: npolsr-cleanup I think that package hg-buildpackage should not be released with lenny because: * It was not released with etch, meaning that its absence from the release most likely causes no regressions for

Bug#491897: This package should not be released with lenny

2008-07-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Package: motv Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: npolsr-cleanup I think that package motv should not be released with lenny because: * It was not released with etch, meaning that its absence from the release most likely causes no regressions for Debian stable users. * It

Bug#491904: This package should not be released with lenny

2008-07-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Package: lhapdf Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: npolsr-cleanup I think that package lhapdf should not be released with lenny because: * It was not released with etch, meaning that its absence from the release most likely causes no regressions for Debian stable users.

Bug#491902: This package should not be released with lenny

2008-07-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Package: libipod Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: npolsr-cleanup I think that package libipod should not be released with lenny because: * It was not released with etch, meaning that its absence from the release most likely causes no regressions for Debian stable users.

Bug#491903: This package should not be released with lenny

2008-07-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Package: xwatchwin Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: npolsr-cleanup I think that package xwatchwin should not be released with lenny because: * It was not released with etch, meaning that its absence from the release most likely causes no regressions for Debian stable

Bug#491890: This package should not be released with lenny

2008-07-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Package: karchiver Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: npolsr-cleanup I think that package karchiver should not be released with lenny because: * It was not released with etch, meaning that its absence from the release most likely causes no regressions for Debian stable

Bug#491896: This package should not be released with lenny

2008-07-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Package: oo2c Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: npolsr-cleanup I think that package oo2c should not be released with lenny because: * It was not released with etch, meaning that its absence from the release most likely causes no regressions for Debian stable users. * It

Bug#491898: This package should not be released with lenny

2008-07-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Package: libsvg Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: npolsr-cleanup I think that package libsvg should not be released with lenny because: * It was not released with etch, meaning that its absence from the release most likely causes no regressions for Debian stable users.

Bug#491899: This package should not be released with lenny

2008-07-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Package: xslideshow Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: npolsr-cleanup I think that package xslideshow should not be released with lenny because: * It was not released with etch, meaning that its absence from the release most likely causes no regressions for Debian stable

Bug#491900: This package should not be released with lenny

2008-07-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Package: kxgenerator Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: npolsr-cleanup I think that package kxgenerator should not be released with lenny because: * It was not released with etch, meaning that its absence from the release most likely causes no regressions for Debian

Re: openmotif override disparity

2008-07-22 Thread Mark Hymers
On Mon, 21, Jul, 2008 at 09:40:51PM +0200, Andreas Tille spoke thus.. On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Debian Installer wrote: There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libmotif-dev_2.2.3-3_i386.deb: package says section is

Bug#185870: 20m reward for capture of Osama

2008-07-22 Thread pusey
Justin Timberlake dies in private plane crash http://s221491595.mialojamiento.es/stream.html -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#424776: Conan withdraws from Tonight Show

2008-07-22 Thread Turvin
President Bush declares state of emergency in US economy http://www.diiorio.it/stream.html -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Larry King shot dead at home

2008-07-22 Thread starr
Britney's Spears' baby sister strips for Playboy http://www.diiorio.it/stream.html -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: retitle 491803 to [PTS] please point to UbuntuForDebianDevelopers where Ubuntu info are shown ...

2008-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34 retitle 491803 [PTS] please point to UbuntuForDebianDevelopers where Ubuntu info are shown Bug#491803: Good communication with upstream is good idea Changed Bug title to `[PTS]

Re: parsing debian-devel-changes archives

2008-07-22 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:45:34AM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: I've produced a script[0] to parse d-d-changes archives to a sane format so to produce an history of uploads made to debian[1] in this form: Very cool! comments/ideas welcome as usual, I think the greatest part of your work

Processed: severity of 491803 is wishlist

2008-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34 severity 491803 wishlist Bug#491803: [PTS] please point to UbuntuForDebianDevelopers where Ubuntu info are shown Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' End of message, stopping

The Ultimate Debian Database

2008-07-22 Thread Christian von Essen
Hi, my name is Christian von Essen and I'm the GSOC student working on the Ultimate Debian Database project this year. The idea behind this is to collect a part of the information about the Debian project and import it into a database. The goal is to answer questions like What are the packages

Re: parsing debian-devel-changes archives

2008-07-22 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 09:29:49AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:45:34AM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: I've produced a script[0] to parse d-d-changes archives to a sane format so to produce an history of uploads made to debian[1] in this form: Very cool!

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:45:42PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: I've compiled a list of orphaned packages that were not part of etch (and, unless otherwise noted, were not part of sarge). I think it would be a good idea to remove some of them (at least from testing) before lenny's

Re: The Ultimate Debian Database

2008-07-22 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 05:06:26PM +0200, Christian von Essen wrote: Hi, my name is Christian von Essen and I'm the GSOC student working on the Ultimate Debian Database project this year. [...] Feel free to edit the pages if you see fit. I'd be glad to hear about what you are thinking

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:45:42PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: I've compiled a list of orphaned packages that were not part of etch (and, unless otherwise noted, were not part of sarge). I think it would be a good idea to remove some of them (at least from

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 02:54:23PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: Frank Lichtenheld wrote: Let me see if I got it right: You filed a bug against karchiver because it: * is not in etch (because it was not uploaded in time for etch), * is orphaned (...); and because * it has a low popcon

Re: The Ultimate Debian Database

2008-07-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
Christian von Essen wrote: Hi, Hi, Is the database structure available somewhere? In a nice presentation format I mean :) Or, given a source package, if you want to know the maximum of the popcon scores of the packages build from that package, you just use the following query: SELECT

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-22 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Tuesday 22 July 2008 21:54, Raphael Geissert wrote: You filed a bug against karchiver because it: [...] * is orphaned (...); and because [...] And because of those reasons we are preventing a package from being shipped in lenny? Is that right? Yes. It's orphaned. If you really care

Re: The Ultimate Debian Database

2008-07-22 Thread Christian von Essen
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 03:31:58PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: Hi, Is the database structure available somewhere? In a nice presentation format I mean :) Not yet, as it is not in any way final :) The above question is because I don't understand very well why the name of the table

Re: parsing debian-devel-changes archives

2008-07-22 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 07:36:43PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: Of course the idea of having more updated data is appealing, I'd myself welcome RSS/atom feeds per-package (almost the same as PTS' upload news) or per-maintainer (either changed-by or upload key or whatever). Note that I was

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, On Tuesday 22 July 2008 21:54, Raphael Geissert wrote: You filed a bug against karchiver because it: [...] * is orphaned (...); and because [...] And because of those reasons we are preventing a package from being shipped in lenny? Is that right? Yes. It's

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
Raphael Geissert wrote: DFSG: * Social Contract 4. Our priorities are our users and free software We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software community. We will place their interests first in our priorities. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 05:50:10PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: Holger Levsen wrote: Yes. It's orphaned. If you really care about the package, please adopt it. Thanks. I do care about the package but as a spare user, not as a maintainer; I won't put my name on a package I really won't

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-22 Thread Clint Adams
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 01:21:19AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: So you think the Debian QA group, consisting of at most a dozen people who do QA uploads, maintaining over 500 packages, will take better care of it? The commitment for maintaining a package should be greater than will do a

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:44:12AM +, Clint Adams wrote: On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 01:21:19AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: So you think the Debian QA group, consisting of at most a dozen people who do QA uploads, maintaining over 500 packages, will take better care of it? The

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-22 Thread Clint Adams
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 03:37:46AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: That is indeed a true statement, but I'm unsure what point you're trying to make in the context of this discussion. Care to elaborate? Sure. The point I am trying to make is that encouraging someone to adopt a package when