Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 493702 1.3.5+dfsg-13
Bug#493702: tla(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date libtool scripts
Bug marked as found in version 1.3.5+dfsg-13 and reopened.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 404248 1.0.2.1-3
Bug#404248: apollon(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date libtool scripts
Bug marked as found in version 1.0.2.1-3 and reopened.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
found 493702 1.3.5+dfsg-13
thanks
Hello (Aurelien),
unfortunately #493702 is not fixed,
The 06-relibtoolize.dpatch is not included in debian/patches/00list,
therefore it is not applied during build.
Petr
tla (1.3.5+dfsg-13) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA upload.
*
found 404248 1.0.2.1-3
thanks
Hi (Aurelien),
the admin/libtool.m4.in have not been updated,
libtool still does not support GNU/kFreeBSD.
Petr
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/fetch.php?pkg=apollonarch=kfreebsd-i386ver=1.0.2.1-3stamp=1218760637file=logas=raw
checking how to recognise
FYI: The status of the fonty source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0-23.7
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: Package not in unstable
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint
Your message dated Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:02:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#404248: fixed in apollon 1.0.2.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #404248,
regarding apollon(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date libtool scripts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
#
# According to the version information these bugs
# affect the stable release, but for one reason or
# another that is not actually true.
#
# Mark them as lenny,sid as discussed on debian-release
# See
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# add version numbers so they dont get falsely assigned to etch
found 441913 6.revised-3.1
Bug#441913: buggy dict-* invoke-rc.d fixes
Bug marked as found in version 6.revised-3.1.
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# add version numbers so they dont get falsely assigned to etch
found 441913 6.revised-3.1
found 441914 20001107-a-3.1
found 441915 1.0.0-5.1
found 441916 0.48-4.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
#
# According to the version information these bugs
# affect the stable release, but for one reason or
# another that is not actually true.
#
# Mark them as lenny,sid as discussed on debian-release
# See
Package: bfr
Version: 1.6-2
Severity: normal
bfr(1) ends with POD ERRORS.
POD ERRORS
Hey! The above document had some coding errors, which are explained
below:
Around line 179:
You forgot a '=back' before '=head2'
Around line 181:
'=item'
* Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-14 18:16]:
The idea of having a script inside devscripts that lists the RC-buggy
and orphaned packages that are locally installed was proposed. I filed a
bug about that. See #495152
These are included already:
wnpp-alert - check for installed
Dear mentors/QA group,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.27-2
of package gimageview (QA upload).
It builds these binary packages:
gimageview - image viewer using GTK+
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 243583, 243584, 389071, 397075,
Le August 15, 2008 01:39:23 am Steve Langasek, vous avez écrit :
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:35:39PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Le August 14, 2008 11:08:10 pm Steve Langasek, vous avez écrit :
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Tagging lenny and sid does
On 15/08/08 at 09:21 +0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-14 18:16]:
The idea of having a script inside devscripts that lists the RC-buggy
and orphaned packages that are locally installed was proposed. I filed a
bug about that. See #495152
These are
On 15/08/08 at 05:49 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:01:26AM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
- O: bugs are now RC, so packages are removed from testing using the
release team's existing policies. Which means that some O: packages
might stay in testing
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
Hi,
please adjust Debian BTS acronym on PTS page footer. There are too many spaces
between 'Bug' and 'Tracking' words, in fact this is how it is actually
displayed:
acronym title=Bug Tracking
SystemBTS/acronym/a.
I guess this
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:08:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Tagging lenny and sid does not imply that other suites are free
from the bug,
Yes, it does.
It only implies
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 09:21:30AM +0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
These are included already:
wnpp-alert - check for installed packages up for adoption or orphaned
rc-alert - check for installed packages with release-critical bugs
Ah, according to #495152 you want cronjobs around those
On Friday 15 August 2008 15:52:55 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 09:21:30AM +0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
These are included already:
wnpp-alert - check for installed packages up for adoption or orphaned
rc-alert - check for installed packages with release-critical
Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:08:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Tagging lenny and sid does not imply that other suites are free
from the bug,
Yes, it does.
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 17:45 +0200, Frank S. Thomas wrote:
[...]
I think it would also be nice if wnpp-alert could sort packages by popcon
score so that developers know which packages are more worth adopting.
That would be #478835.
Adam
(who really should be packing and not reading mail :-)
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Luk Claes wrote:
Don Armstrong wrote:
*** proposal ***
For the purposes of determining buginess, setting a distribution tag
limits the bugginess of a package in distribtions to the intersection
of the distributions and the version-based bugginness of a package.
This
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
*** proposal ***
For the purposes of determining buginess, setting a distribution tag
limits the bugginess of a package in distribtions to the intersection
of the distributions and the version-based bugginness of a package.
This means that a bug that
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 01:41:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Hi.
I had the idea to go through the list of RC bugs currently
believed by the BTS to affect stable and do some cleanup
work:
* Fix version information
* Mark by etch-ignore bus that are not affected in stable
for
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Sure, Luk was here, and didn't express any disagreement. Actually, I
tried hard to give several opportunities to raise concerns, but
everybody apparently really agreed with the proposal. (you might want to
check the video when it will be available)
That wasn't really my
On 15/08/08 at 12:30 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Sure, Luk was here, and didn't express any disagreement. Actually, I
tried hard to give several opportunities to raise concerns, but
everybody apparently really agreed with the proposal. (you might want to
check the video
Your message dated Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:29:53 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 1977
has caused the Debian Bug report #495227,
regarding PTS: please adjust BTS acronym
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 05:48:56PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Don Armstrong wrote:
This means that a bug that would normally be buggy in etch and lenny
(but fixed in sid) due to the versions present of that package would
only be present in lenny if tagged lenny and tagged sid.
Does this also
Le August 15, 2008 10:29:45 am Don Armstrong, vous avez écrit :
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:08:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Tagging lenny and sid does not imply that other
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Supposing your proposal is accepted, would the debbugs teams copy
the state of the stable tag when creating a new testing tag? For
example, would a bug tagged lenny get the tag for Debian 6 when
adding that tag?
Not automatically, but it's not
31 matches
Mail list logo
