Followup-For: Bug #1071008
I noticed in piuparts that the package is currently uninstallable,
probably related to this bug.
Selecting previously unselected package libx52pro0.
Preparing to unpack .../libx52pro0_0.1.1-3_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libx52pro0 (0.1.1-3) ...
dpkg: error
Package: libgnokii7t64
Version: 0.6.31+dfsg-5.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file, which is a violation of Policy 12.5:
On 04/05/2024 13.02, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I have patched sendmail in order to enable O RejectNUL=True directive,
but I do not achieved the fact to enable it by default.
Andreas could you get a glimpse at how to render RejectNUL a default ?
Second attempt. Completely untested
ade1a2cac3892eedc07a5f2e47db2213950d0d6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Beckmann
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 10:31:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] enable 'O RejectNUL=true' in the default sendmail.cf
---
debian/cf/debian/sendmail.mc.in | 3 +++
debian/cf/feature/rejectnul.m4 | 3 +++
2 files changed, 6 insertions
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
would it be possible to color-code the Excuses links based on the
migration status? I'd think about
* green -> "Will attempt migration"
* red -> "BLOCKED"
* (default) -> "check later"
Maybe the "red" flag could further be distinguished between
Source: pantalaimon
Version: 0.10.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
pantalaimon FTBFS in sid (but could be built successfully in bookworm):
dh_auto_test -O--buildsystem=pybuild
I: pybuild base:311: cd
Followup-For: Bug #1066223
X-Debbugs-Cc: Bastian Germann
Control: tag -1 pending
Hi Bastian,
I've fixed the remaining implicit function declarations and related bugs
in GIT. Do you want to take it from here again?
We should probably fix the nonverbose build in this very special build
system,
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:03:27 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libast
Version: 0.7-9.1
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
> snprintf.c:45:22: error: unknown type name ‘size_t’
>45 | vsnprintf(char *str, size_t count, const char *fmt,
Followup-For: Bug #1053169
Migration is currently blocked behind the t64 transition.
Andreas
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
This does not seem to be a transient error:
Error: remote: warning: unable to find all commit-graph files
https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=acpi-call
https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=nvidia-support
Andreas
Package: atm-tools
Version: 1:2.5.1-5.1~exp1
Severity: serious
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
X-Debbugs-Cc: Steve Langasek
atm-tools/experimental has gained two unexpected files, causing file
conflicts on upgrades:
$ debdiff atm-tools_1%3a2.5.1-5_amd64.deb
Package: scanbd
Version: 1.5.1-7
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
X-Debbugs-Cc: Chris Hofstaedtler
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'bookworm'.
It installed fine in 'bookworm', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.
Hi,
This does not seem to be related to piuparts at all. AFAIK we don't run
piuparts on !amd64.
On 03/12/2023 15.44, Markus Koschany wrote:
maybe someone on this list can point me in the right direction. The package
src:spring doesn't migrate to testing because "spring-javaai/arm64 has
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: important
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
X-Debbugs-Cc: Cyril Brulebois
The list of RC bugs in sid
https://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=sid=ign=7=7=1=id=desc=html#results
does not contain e.g. #1055136 filed against
Source: propellor
Version: 5.13-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid trixie
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
propellor FTBFS with ghc 9.4 (it still builds fine with 9.0 in testing):
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/propellor/-/jobs/4840519
[139 of
On 24/10/2023 23.52, Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
New user of debian/watch and I cannot see why it reports failure in a
qa.debian.org but I cannot reproduce it.
status: error
warnings: In debian/watch no matching files for watch line
https://github.com/kyan001/ping3/tags
On 07/02/2023 12.12, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I recently moved bin:firmware-nvidia-gsp from
src:nvidia-graphics-drivers from the non-free archive area to the new
non-free-firmware archive area. As a result src:nvidia-graphics-drivers
is now considered to be in non-free-firmware, too. Second
On 31/07/2023 08.52, Marco wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 18:46:11 + Marco wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 08:28:22 + Marco wrote:
Fedora has some systemd unit files included, maybe these are helpful
here:
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/sendmail/sendmail/fedora-rawhide.html#files
On 30/07/2023 20.46, Marco wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 08:28:22 + Marco wrote:
Fedora has some systemd unit files included, maybe these are helpful
here:
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/sendmail/sendmail/fedora-rawhide.html#files
Is anybody here working on that issue?
As
On 17/07/2023 07.16, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Then I found trei...@debian.org using edos-file-overwrite. That latter
one seems like what I need here. Should we move it to the qa space and
drop the edos part? I suggest debian-qa@lists.debian.org usertags
file-overwrite. Otherwise, Ralf are you ok
Package: kytos-sphinx-theme
Version: 0.0.1+dfsg-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink:
0m29.3s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
Package: python3-socketio-client
Version: 0.6.5-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package emits a SyntaxWarning
during installation:
Setting up python3-socketio-client (0.6.5-1) ...
Package: librem-ec-acpi-dkms
Version: 0.9.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
DKMS make.log for librem_ec_acpi-0.9.1 for kernel 6.3.0-1-amd64 (x86_64)
Thu Jun 15 10:09:49 UTC 2023
make: Entering directory
Package: awstats
Version: 7.8-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there is
On 06/06/2023 21.19, cardinale.salvo55 wrote:
Can this be helpfull in building a working package for bullseye?
bullseye-pu request: https://bugs.debian.org/1037187
Andreas
On 09/05/2023 16.55, Helmut Grohne wrote:
9base/bookworm no longer does, because it now uses dpkg-triggers to
Good to know that there is a better way nowadays ...
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m45.2s ERROR: FAIL: After purging files have been modified:
/etc/shells
Package: 9base
Version: 1:6-13
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package leaves modifications
in /etc/shells after upgrading from bullseye to bookworm and purging the
package.
9base/bullseye called
On 07/05/2023 08.44, Paul Wise wrote:
I noticed that someone added the piuparts usertag to a whole bunch of
bugs of many different ages and that many of those bugs are FTBFS bugs.
These are intentional. There are usually also Affects on some binary
packages built from that source. The FTBFS
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
while cleaning up bugs remaining orphaned after the archival of jessie,
I noticed that tracker.d.o sometimes displays incorrect release
information in the "versions" box, e.g.
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/fedmsg-meta-debian
That package was
On 18/04/2023 20.30, Patrice Duroux wrote:
Hi,
After considering https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/mrtg_2.17.10-4+b1.log
and reporting #1034530, I would like to be sure that another case
like: https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/pass/pipewire_0.3.65-3.log is
more tricky due to that pipewire may
Followup-For: Bug #1012232
Control: reassign -1 src:freespace2 3.7.4+repack-1.1
Control: tag -1 sid bookworm
Control: retitle -1 freespace2: missing B-D: pkg-config, libglu1-mesa-dev
The autoconf error is a red herring.
The actual problem are missing
Build-Depends: pkg-config, libglu1-mesa-dev
Followup-For: Bug #1012232
Control: found -1 2.71-3
The problem is still reproducible when rebuilding src:freespace2 in sid
with latest autoconf.
Andreas
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: Cyril Brulebois
I recently moved bin:firmware-nvidia-gsp from
src:nvidia-graphics-drivers from the non-free archive area to the new
non-free-firmware archive area. As a result src:nvidia-graphics-drivers
is now considered to be in
On 07/02/2023 09.41, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
But with >3 source packages to monitor, we're not able to verify new
releases each hour. It's a process that is spread over a longer period...
I don't know if this is already done, but from historic release data it
might be possible to derive
Package: adv-17v35x-dkms
Version: 5.0.6.0-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
adv-17v35x-dkms fails to build the kernel module for Linux 6.1:
DKMS make.log for adv-17v35x-5.0.6.0 for kernel 6.1.0-2-amd64 (x86_64)
Tue Jan 31 16:13:56 UTC 2023
make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-6.1.0-2-amd64'
Package: planner,planner-data
Version: 0.14.91-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your packages failed to install
because they tries to overwrite each others files.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Package: adv-17v35x-dkms
Version: 5.0.6.0-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
the adv-17v35x-dkms module cannot be built for Linux 6.0:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/a/adv-17v35x/27922615/log.gz
DKMS make.log for adv-17v35x-5.0.6.0 for kernel 6.0.0-2-amd64 (x86_64)
Fri Nov 4
Control: severity -1 normal
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 13:26:54 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: src:dropwatch
Version: 1.5.3-1
dropwatch build times out in the testsuite, no output available in the build
log.
The 1.5.4-1 release built fine on the buildds for all release
architectures. But
On 24/09/2022 11.16, Marco wrote:
Why is sid (that has 8.17.1.9-1) still listed as affected by ALPACA?
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3618
This thread says this is has already been fixed with 8.16.1.
Right now, I see this as fixed in the security tracker, but maybe the
Hi Yvan,
thanks for spotting this issue.
On 26/09/2022 13.59, Yvan Masson wrote:
I had a quick look on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sendmail but could
not find where is stored this translation: for my general knowledge,
could you tell me where it is?
These translations are not part of
On 13/06/2022 08.11, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
Thank you very much for providing the package. Version 8.17.1.9-1
wokrs for me :-)
Thanks for pointing me to the fix, that made it much easier.
And for confirming that it works.
Andreas
On 12/06/2022 09.03, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
> reopen 1009078 =
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> I am sorry to say that the newly arrived version 8.17.1-2 in testing shows
> the same behaviour as the
> originally reported version 8.16.1-2, no auth mechanisms offered after
> starttls.
>
> Downgrading to
On 05/06/2022 20.25, Paul Gevers wrote:
> However, this looks like the path where the issue lies.
> bin:nvidia-kernel-dkms (non-free, built from src:nvidia-graphics-drivers
> in non-free) Depends (on amd64 only) on nvidia-firmware-470.103.01 which
> is Provided by bin:nvidia-kernel-support (built
On 07/04/2022 02.15, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
Package: sendmail
Version: 8.16.1-2
With the current sendmail in testing, my incoming smtp auth configuration does
not
work anymore.
could you try sendmail 8.17 from experimental?
Andreas
Followup-For: Bug #1007750
Control: tag -1 sid bookworm
Control: retitle -1 src:libnfsidmap: libnfsidmap-dev is also built by
src:nfs-utils
libnfsidmap | 0.25-6| stable | source
libnfsidmap-dev | 0.25-6| stable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf,
i386, mips64el, mipsel,
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
some parts of the pages generated by the (old) PTS no longer get
updated:
E.g. https://packages.qa.debian.org/s/spirv-llvm-translator-12.html
(a relatively new package)
* 'versions' box: only lists the version in unstable, not the one in
testing
*
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
DDPO currently uses the "No Entry" sign with read background ⛔ (U+26D4)
for the "neutral" CI state. I find this more eye-catching than the "fail"
state (which uses the word "fail" in red).
The CI pages itself use the "No Entry" sign with a blue
Package: scalapack-doc
Version: 1.5-11
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
scalapack-doc is several releases behind scalapack:
scalapack | 1.8.0-6 | squeeze | source
scalapack | 1.8.0-9 | wheezy | source
scalapack | 1.8.0-12 | jessie | source
scalapack | 1.8.0-13 |
Package: human-icon-theme
Version: 0.28.debian-6.1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: nthyk...@master.debian.org
Usertags: compat-5-6-removal
Hi,
The package human-icon-theme uses debhelper with a compat level of 5 or 6,
which is no longer supported [1].
Please bump the debhelper compat
Package: tangerine-icon-theme
Version: 0.26.debian-5
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: nthyk...@master.debian.org
Usertags: compat-5-6-removal
Hi,
The package tangerine-icon-theme uses debhelper with a compat level of 5 or 6,
which is no longer supported [1].
Please bump the debhelper
Package: libglobalarrays-dev,libga-dev
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Control: found -1 5.7.2-2
Control: found -1 1:2.4.7-5
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their
Control: tag -1 help
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:51:48 +0100 Samuel Thibault
wrote:
Package: tcm
Version: 2.20+TSQD-4.2
tcm currently FTBFS on non-linux archs, apparently due to a non-matching
patch, see for instance
Actually, the problem starts with the build system not recognizing the
I still find very odd that
$ dak rm -Rn python-setuptools-scm
doesn't find anything though. dak is obviously aware of the package...
You missed -b for binary packages:
$ dak rm -Rn -b python-setuptools-scm
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
python-setuptools-scm |
On 27/08/2021 11.35, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
sendmail should be updated to get the correct cflags. I'll try to work
on a patch.
Many thanks for the very quick fix!
Andreas
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
On 15/01/2021 17.12, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
As pointed out in #978954, its better to replace it by a dummy with the
broken download/install functionality removed to ensure clean upgrades.
That was shipped in bullseye and buster.
So let's postpone
Package: firmware-b43legacy-installer
Version: 4.178.10.4-4
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: close -1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package
Control: fixed -1 8.16.1-1
Control: tag -1 + help
On 20/07/2021 22.21, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
https://alpaca-attack.com/ affects sendmail. It was fixed in
the latest 3.16.1 release:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975623#c13
Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2021-06-29 05:11:36 UTC
Package: omnievents-doc
Version: 1:2.6.2-5.1
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m11.6s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
Followup-For: Bug #903794
Control: found -1 3.0-a9+debian.1-5
Control: tag -1 patch
Please apply the attached patch for moving the manpage symlinks to the
right place.
Andreas
>From 3c2d868282662549f0fc7814e65254d27a2aa8e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Beckmann
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2
Fix uploaded, please take care of an unblock if you think this should be
in bullseye.
Andreas
Control: reassign -1 piuparts-slave-from-git-deps
On Mon, 14 May 2018 11:34:37 +0200 Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Adrian Bunk , 2018-03-15, 21:22:
>adequate already seems to try to check this, but for some reason it
>doesn't find the libinput-dev problem.
adequate checks these dependencies only if
Control: severity -1 important
Control: retitle -1 pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of bookworm
On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:14:49 +0100 Gunnar Hjalmarsson
wrote:
> But let me add that even if Opera fixes that, users may think they want
> to enable flash, try to install
Source: cuneiform
Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-7.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-10
Hi,
cuneiform started to FTBFS when GCC 10 was made the default compiler:
[ 31%]
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 16:32:37 + Jesse57901
wrote:
> When running firmware-b43-installer after unpacking and setting up gives
> message (debconf:unable to initialize frontend: Dialog). Complete readout
> from installer:
>
> Unpacking firmware-b43-installer (1:019-4)
Package: libxine2-bin
Version: 1.2.10-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
Hi,
in the list of all RC bugs in oldstable:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=stretch=ign=7=7=1=1=1=1=1=last_modified=desc=html#results
there are
#945456 [u] xul-ext-torbirdy
On 27/04/2020 19.55, peter green wrote:
> 1. What should the policy be on handling virtual packages? it seems to
> me that virtual packages with only a single provider should be treated
> much the same as real packages but what about those with multiple
> providers? ignore them? pick one according
Source: xpdf
Version: 3.04-13exp3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid bullseye experimental
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
xpdf/experimental FTBFS against libpoppler-dev/experimental (0.85.0-1):
debian/rules override_dh_auto_build
make[1]:
On 14/03/2020 09.51, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Maybe split it out to a new libreoffice-dev-gui package or somesuch? (That
> would need NEW though,
> and thus will only be done with the 7.0 packages)? But a tiny package just
> for this tool... (that's why
> it was consumed in the -dev package.)
I'd
Control: tag -1 unreproducible
Control: close -1
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:48:21 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: minlog
> Version: 4.0.99.20100221-6
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
> > pdflatex mpcref.tex >> /dev/null
> > make[2]: *** [Makefile:19: mpcref.pdf] Error 1
I cannot
Hi Boyuan,
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 16:17:37 -0500 Boyuan Yang wrote:
> No idea why. Looks like we need to have python3-zeitgeist removed eventually.
>
> However before that, I'm going for a workaround: Upload an experimental
> version with higher version string, e.g., 1.0.2+py3-0.
That happened,
Control: tag -1 upstream
Control: found -1 8.15.2-8
Hi Bjørn,
interesting problem.
On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:26:27 +0100 =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?=
wrote:
> The bug is that sendmail returns sendmail process start time instead of
> current time when milters request the "$b" macro ("The current
Package: coinor-libdylp-dev
Version: 1.10.4-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages.
See policy 7.6 at
On 28/11/2019 13.39, David Bürgin wrote:
> Given all this, I want to propose changing the log level of this message
> to debug (SMI_LOG_DEBUG), guarded by ‘if (dbg > 0)’ as elsewhere.
Your reasoning sounds plausible. Can you provide a patch?
Andreas
Package: python3-bcolz
Version: 1.2.1+ds2-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite
Source: roger-router
Version: 1.8.14-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
roger-router FTBFS against the current evolution-data-server version in
sid:
Source: xpdf
Version: 3.04-13exp2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
xpdf/experimental FTBFS on all architectures:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=xpdf=experimental
debian/rules build-arch
dh build-arch
Package: boxbackup
Version: 0.13~~git20190527.g039c4a1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
boxbackup/experimental FTBFS in my sid/experimental pbuilder environment
on amd64 and i386. This seems to be a recent
Package: tstools
Version: 1.13~git20151030-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the following problem:
Package: python3-zc.buildout
Version: 2.13.2-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to
Package: python3-zope.testrunner
Version: 4.4.9-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to
Followup-For: Bug #406668
Control: reopen -1
Control: reassign -1 alpine
ajaxterm has been removed from Debian, reassigning to alpine only.
Andreas
Package: python-libpcap
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus
Hi Ron,
On 21/07/2019 05.42, Ron Murray wrote:
> On upgrade to buster, sendmail upgrade failed with this message:
>
>> start-stop-daemon: matching only on non-root pidfile
>> /var/run/sendmail/mta/sendmail.pid is insecure
>
> Some work with Google found Debian bug #922395, which, although not
Package: cflow-doc,cflow-l10n
Version: 1:1.6-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because
Source: xpdf
Version: 3.04-13exp1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
xpdf/experimental FTBFS on all architectures:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=xpdf=experimental
build/XPDFApp.cc: In member function
Package: syslinux-themes-debian-squeeze,syslinux-themes-debian-wheezy
Version: 12-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid buster
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll
Control: tag -1 - patch moreinfo
On 2019-02-07 13:59, Thierry fa...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry - I am not proposing a patch (may have write a bad bug header).
OK, fixing the metadata.
Andreas
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
We currently have no ppc64el binaries for cuneiform, so this is not a
regressions and therefore not RC.
On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 14:50:47 +0100 "Thierry fa...@linux.ibm.com"
wrote:
> --- images/phototest.tif.txt 2011-04-19 12:49:57.0
Package: python3-link-grammar
Version: 5.5.1-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
1m41.0s ERROR: FAIL: Broken
On 2019-01-14 19:53, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 12/01/19 at 08:32 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Source packages that build binary-arch packages, but no amd64 binary
>> packages are usually not tested by archive wide rebuilds and may
>> silently FTBFS for a long time.
On 2019-01-12 15:26, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 08:32:42AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Source packages that build binary-arch packages, but no amd64 binary
>> packages are usually not tested by archive wide rebuilds and may
>> silently FTBFS for a lon
Hi,
I just looked at #917650, the qi FTBFS which goes back to jessie (at least).
Source packages that build binary-arch packages, but no amd64 binary
packages are usually not tested by archive wide rebuilds and may
silently FTBFS for a long time.
This should not affect packages building only
Package: simba
Version: 0.8.4-5
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge due
to a command not found. According to policy 7.2 you cannot rely on the
depends being available during purge, only the
Package: eldav
Version: 0.8.1-10
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package removes files that
were installed by this package.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
1m7.9s ERROR: FAIL: debsums reports
Control: tag -1 - patch
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 06:15:51 +0200 Christian Trenkwalder
wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
The fofix package unfortunately has no maintainer any more.
https://bugs.debian.org/836421
> after installing the fofix package on a (up-to-date) system,
> the application terminates
On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 14:21:54 +0200 Johannes Schauer
wrote:
> Upstream version 0.54 of po4a removed po4a-build:
> Since it is unclear to me what the correct replacement for po4a-build is, I
> contacted upstream about it:
>
> https://github.com/mquinson/po4a/issues/144
>
> Since this bug is also
On 2018-08-14 21:27, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>* Remove cd-paranoia package again; the binary is also provided by
> libcdio-utils. (Reopens: #889803, Closes: #906112)
Nope, it is no longer provided by libcdio-utils >= 0.92
This was an issue upgrading from stretch.
Andreas
Package: cd-paranoia
Version: 10.2+0.94+2-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'stable'.
It installed fine in 'stable', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite
Package: libcue-dev
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
an upgrade test with piuparts revealed that your package installs files
over existing symlinks and possibly overwrites files owned by other
packages. This usually means an old version
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
