On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 12:42:31PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
If you like the email based approach I've mentioned in my former post
and point please let me know, I would happy to contribute a patch for
that.
I do, although I'd like to reorganize more than that too. For example,
right now
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 06:18:28PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
What my patches actually do is switch to an email address-based naming (in
everywhere: lintian reports generator, developer.php and PTS).
As for what I understood that's what you want to do, am I mistaken?
No, you're not. It's
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 12:42:31PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I do, although I'd like to reorganize more than that too. For example,
right now everything is written to one giant directory, which isn't a
good idea. It would also be nice to have
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:17:39AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Let's do this. Let's standardize on:
Ok, cool. Many thanks!
I'll implement the convention PTS side, let me know when the new scheme
is read on the lintian side.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:17:39AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Let's do this. Let's standardize on:
Ok, cool. Many thanks!
I'll implement the convention PTS side, let me know when the new scheme
is read on the lintian side.
I'll sneak this into
On Mon, December 3, 2007 08:48, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
My main problem with the current naming scheme is that it is also open
to clashes. If two maintainer names are different only for an accented
letter they would clash into the very same page.
Clashes are already there, even without
* Stefano Zacchiroli [Mon, 03 Dec 2007 08:48:31 +0100]:
My main problem with the current naming scheme is that it is also open
to clashes. If two maintainer names are different only for an accented
letter they would clash into the very same page.
(Plus we already have at least two maintainers
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you aware of having several external links pointing into
lintian.debian.org beside the PTS? I guess beside the PTS and maybe
personal DD's homepage there won't be many, but I might be utterly wrong
of course.
I would have thought so, but maybe
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:27:41PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
I surely can, but before doing so I would prefer to fix the URL naming
scheme in the right place, see my reply to Russ.
What my patches actually do is switch to an email address-based naming (in
Hi, I'm working a bit on the PTS these days, and I've just noticed that
the current way used to point to per-package lintian checks from the PTS
is not reliable.
For example, if you look at the PTS page of amule [1] you can notice
that the lintian URL is dangling. The current algorithm
Hello Stefano,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
This does not correspond to what lintian.debian.org is doing, partly for
the PTS bug, partly for (I guess, though I'm not sure) a lintian bug
which does not replace with __ for the last character of maintainer
name. For example, at [2], if you look
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've already tried once to fix this problem and even submitted a patch, but
I recommend you to read the whole bug report[1].
It would be great if you could finish my work on that.
I'm also happy to change the lintian escaping algorithm to make it
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 02:01:04PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I'm also happy to change the lintian escaping algorithm to make it easier
for corner cases, but I'd rather not change the algorithm in a way that
would invalidate other external links unless we declare a major flag day
Are you aware
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:27:41PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
So, question, what is the actual algorithm used by lintian.d.o to patch
maintainer names?
The script used to generate the html pages is available at:
http://svn.wolffelaar.nl/lintian/trunk/reporting/html_reports
There you
14 matches
Mail list logo
