Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures

2017-08-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum 
On 29/05/17 at 08:12 -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 03:09:55PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> > On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum"  wrote:
> > > I tried with the first package listed.  It works fine with devscripts
> > > 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and
> > > installed on ullmann.debian.org).
> > >
> > > To fix that, an update of that backport is needed.
> > 
> > I've yet to do that because it would require a backport of the licensecheck
> > package, too, since that was split out of devscripts.
> 
> Thanks to fsfs backporting licensecheck, I've updated devscripts'
> backport to 2.17.5~bpo8+1.

Thanks!

As a result, the uscan output is now fine for the packages that had
issues previously, so I'm closing this bug.

https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?email1fonts-kanjistrokeorders+fonts-ricty-diminished+gawk-doc==html#todo

Lucas

Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures

2017-05-29 Thread James McCoy 
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 03:09:55PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum"  wrote:
> > I tried with the first package listed.  It works fine with devscripts
> > 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and
> > installed on ullmann.debian.org).
> >
> > To fix that, an update of that backport is needed.
> 
> I've yet to do that because it would require a backport of the licensecheck
> package, too, since that was split out of devscripts.

Thanks to fsfs backporting licensecheck, I've updated devscripts'
backport to 2.17.5~bpo8+1.

Cheers,
-- 
James
GPG Key: 4096R/91BF BF4D 6956 BD5D F7B7  2D23 DFE6 91AE 331B A3DB

Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures

2017-02-15 Thread Vagrant Cascadian 
On 2016-11-01, James McCoy wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum"  wrote:
>> I tried with the first package listed.  It works fine with devscripts
>> 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and
>> installed on ullmann.debian.org).
>>
>> To fix that, an update of that backport is needed.
>
> I've yet to do that because it would require a backport of the licensecheck
> package, too, since that was split out of devscripts.

I don't know how many packages this is impacting, but the watch file for
epoptes, which works with stretch's devscripts (2.17.1), is also failing
to find a new version on the tracker.debian.org and udd.debian.org
pages. It's a little distracting...


Thanks for all your work on QA infrastructure, this is a relatively
small annoyance in an overall tremendously useful system!


live well,
  vagrant


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures

2016-11-01 Thread James McCoy 
On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum"  wrote:
> I tried with the first package listed.  It works fine with devscripts
> 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and
> installed on ullmann.debian.org).
>
> To fix that, an update of that backport is needed.

I've yet to do that because it would require a backport of the licensecheck
package, too, since that was split out of devscripts.

Cheers,
James

Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures

2016-11-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum 
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd

Hi,

(filing as a bug)

On 01/10/16 at 13:21 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi (I'm not on this list, so CC to me please),
> 
>  Those 3 packages got uscan error in Maintainer Dashboard page
> 
> 
> > fonts-kanjistrokeorders debian/watch: uscan returned an error: In 
> > debian/watch no matching files for watch line http://www.nihilist.org.uk/ 
> > http://www.nihilist.org.uk/KanjiStrokeOrders_v[-_](\d[\-+\.:\~\da-zA-Z]*)(?i)\.(?:tar\.xz|tar\.bz2|tar\.gz|zip)\?attredirects=0
> >  debian uupdate
> > 
> > fonts-ricty-diminished  debian/watch: uscan returned an error: In 
> > debian/watch no matching files for watch line 
> > http://www.rs.tus.ac.jp/yyusa/ricty_diminished.html 
> > ricty_diminished/ricty_diminished-[-_](\d[\-+\.:\~\da-zA-Z]*)(?i)\.(?:tar\.xz|tar\.bz2|tar\.gz|zip)
> > 
> > gawk-docdebian/watch: uscan returned an error:
> 
> 
>  However, it works fine on my box. I guess it may be caused by use version 4
>  syntax for debian/watch file.
> 
> > $ uscan --verbose
> > (snip)
> > uscan info: Matching target for downloadurlmangle: 
> > https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gawk/gawk-4.1.4.tar.xz
> > uscan info: Upstream URL (downloadurlmangled):
> >https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gawk/gawk-4.1.4.tar.xz
> > uscan info: Newest upstream tarball version selected for download 
> > (uversionmangled): 4.1.4
> > uscan info: Download filename (filenamemangled): gawk-4.1.4.tar.xz
> > uscan info: Newest version of gawk-doc on remote site is 4.1.4, local 
> > version is 4.1.4
> > uscan info:=> Package is up to date for from
> >   https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gawk/gawk-4.1.4.tar.xz
> > uscan info: Scan finished
> 
>  Can anyone can look into it, please?

I tried with the first package listed.  It works fine with devscripts
2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and
installed on ullmann.debian.org).

To fix that, an update of that backport is needed.

Lucas