mined_2000.10-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: mined_2000.10-4.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mined/mined_2000.10-4.diff.gz mined_2000.10-4.dsc to pool/main/m/mined/mined_2000.10-4.dsc mined_2000.10-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mined/mined_2000.10-4_i386.deb Override entries for your package: mined_2000.10-4.dsc - source editors

Processing of mined_2000.10-4_i386.changes

mined_2000.10-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mined_2000.10-4.dsc mined_2000.10-4.diff.gz mined_2000.10-4_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

august_0.63-beta1-7_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: august_0.63-beta1-7.diff.gz to pool/main/a/august/august_0.63-beta1-7.diff.gz august_0.63-beta1-7.dsc to pool/main/a/august/august_0.63-beta1-7.dsc august_0.63-beta1-7_all.deb to pool/main/a/august/august_0.63-beta1-7_all.deb Override entries for your package:

Processing of august_0.63-beta1-7_i386.changes

august_0.63-beta1-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: august_0.63-beta1-7.dsc august_0.63-beta1-7.diff.gz august_0.63-beta1-7_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#381761: tidev-modules-source: postinst/postrm depmod -- update templates to use dh_installmodules instead

Hello Matej, On Sunday 13 August 2006 06:21, Matej Vela wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: this bug report is part of a mass-bugfiling. Your package tidev-modules-source is calling depmod in its postinst and/or postrm scripts. [...] As far as I can tell, no, it isn't. Where's the

Processed: submitter 373963

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 submitter 373963 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#373963: drupal 4.5.8-1.1 filter.module is broken Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ! to [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping

Bug#158474: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libjpeg-mmx |0.1.5-4 | source libjpeg-mmx-dev |0.1.5-4 | i386 libjpeg-mmx-progs |0.1.5-4 | i386 Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may

Bug#314672: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: uncc | 0.1.2+20030821-3 | source, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from

Bug#324778: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libswt-pocketpc3-java | 3.0-3 | all libswt-pocketpc3-jni | 3.0-3 | all swt-pocketpc | 3.0-3 | source Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database

Bug#323678: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: xcircuit | 3.6.24-1 | source, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag

Bug#348793: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libqglviewer-dev | 1.4-3 | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libqglviewer1 | 1.4-3 | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips,

Bug#327623: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: nsmon | 2.3e-5 | source, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag

Bug#349243: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: pgaccess | 1:0.98.8.20030520-4 | source, all Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The

Bug#364347: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: rfb | 0.6.1-13 | source, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database

Bug#354496: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libpsys-dev | 1.56-4 | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libpsys1 | 1.56-4 | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386,

Bug#361018: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: zope-zshell | 1.60-4 | source, all Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s)

Bug#364280: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: eroaster | 2.2.0-0.9a-2 | source, all Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The

Bug#369209: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: animal | 0.14.3-4 | source libanimal-0.14.3-0 | 0.14.3-4 | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libanimal-dev | 0.14.3-4 |

Bug#380848: Renaming jaxml to python-jaxml

Jerome Alet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:45:49PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: Well, my gut feeling is that jaxml is dead upstream and not likely to be adopted (I've never had much luck contacting Victor, cf. #305460, #312834, #317408). I'll be glad to be proven wrong of

dmachinemon_0.32.5-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: dmachinemon-master_0.32.5-5_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dmachinemon/dmachinemon-master_0.32.5-5_i386.deb dmachinemon-servent_0.32.5-5_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dmachinemon/dmachinemon-servent_0.32.5-5_i386.deb dmachinemon-treeview_0.32.5-5_i386.deb to

dmachinemon override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libdmsocket-0.32.5-0-dev_0.32.5-5_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. libdnas-application-0.32.5-0-dev_0.32.5-5_i386.deb: package says section is devel,

Bug#307561: marked as done (dmachinemon: Build-Depends on obsolete doc++)

Your message dated Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:02:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307561: fixed in dmachinemon 0.32.5-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#349879: marked as done (dmachinemon: A formatting error results in a missing word in dmrun.1)

Your message dated Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:02:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#349879: fixed in dmachinemon 0.32.5-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processing of dmachinemon_0.32.5-5_i386.changes

dmachinemon_0.32.5-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: dmachinemon_0.32.5-5.dsc dmachinemon_0.32.5-5.diff.gz dmachinemon_0.32.5-5_i386.deb rnas-gtk_0.32.5-5_i386.deb libdnas-core-0.32.5-0_0.32.5-5_i386.deb libdnas-core-0.32.5-0-dev_0.32.5-5_i386.deb

Processed: Re: Bug#381761: tidev-modules-source: postinst/postrm depmod -- update templates to use dh_installmodules instead

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 381761 tidev-modules-source: update-modules deprecated Bug#381761: tidev-modules-source: postinst/postrm depmod -- update templates to use dh_installmodules instead Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#381761: tidev-modules-source: postinst/postrm depmod -- update templates to use dh_installmodules instead

retitle 381761 tidev-modules-source: update-modules deprecated thanks Bernd Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: sorry, tidev-modules-source got probably by accident into the list. Anyway looking at I see that it is calling 'update-modules', though the man page of update-modules says that it

tla 1.3.5+dfsg-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the tla source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.3.3-3 Current version: 1.3.5+dfsg-2 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

Bug#336239: sourcenav doesn't start

Steffen Joeris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The package is installable, but the application doesn't start after installation. I got the following error message: Error: invalid command name %W yview scroll [expr {- (%D / 120) * 4}] units snavigator starts fine for me on current sid. Is this

Processed: Fixed bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unblock 368515 by 368514 Bug#368515: Removal of libgtk1.2 python bindings (meta-bug) Was blocked by: 368514 368518 368519 368521 368523 368524 368525 368526 368527 Blocking bugs of 368515 removed: 368514 unblock 368515 by 368525 Bug#368515: Removal of

Processed: No longer pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 307821 - pending Bug#307821: drupal: New upstream version (4.6.0) Tags were: pending Tags removed: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#381761: tidev-modules-source: postinst/postrm depmod -- update templates to use dh_installmodules instead

On Sunday 13 August 2006 21:58, Matej Vela wrote: retitle 381761 tidev-modules-source: update-modules deprecated thanks Bernd Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: sorry, tidev-modules-source got probably by accident into the list. Anyway looking at I see that it is calling 'update-modules',

Processed: Clarify title

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 251570 rscheme: bad compiled-in library paths Bug#251570: rscheme: Bug #238942 was not fixed at all Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: Fix title

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 173617 falconseye: Does not work when launched from menu Bug#173617: Subject: falconseye: Does not work when launched from menu Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Processed: tag 221441 patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 221441 patch Bug#221441: rolldice output is biased There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: Fix title, severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 182821 htdig: use doc2html external converter Bug#182821: SEC: UNCLASS: WISHLIST: htdig package, use doc2html external conv erter Changed Bug title. severity 182821 wishlist Bug#182821: htdig: use doc2html external converter Severity set to

Processed: Re: websieve: dependency problem

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 276021 - patch Bug#276021: websieve: dependency problem Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#276021: websieve: dependency problem

tag 276021 - patch thanks Patch for this bug promised but not provided. -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Bug#336239: marked as done (sourcenav doesn't start)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:01:26 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line no longer present has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to