It sounds like the big question is whether we want to remove Motif
version or not. If we want to continue to retain, we may want to have
both (e.g.) xpdf-motif and xpdf-qt (and default is xpdf-qt).
I personally think the only advantage of xpdf-motif (3.0.4) is speed -
because it has a small
On 2018-02-13 23:39:09 +0100, Florian Schlichting wrote:
> xpdf 4.00 switched from motif to QT. IMHO this eliminates the only
> reason to use xpdf instead of evince,
Not really. One problem with evince is that its UI is designed for
GNOME only:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745854
xpdf 4.00 switched from motif to QT. IMHO this eliminates the only
reason to use xpdf instead of evince, given that both are based on
poppler in Debian. I think we should keep maintaining 3.04 as a fork as
long as this is feasible, although anyone is of course welcome to
backport fixes and
Package: xpdf
Version: 3.04-4
Severity: wishlist
There's a new major upstream version 4.00:
http://www.xpdfreader.com/download.html
In particular:
http://www.xpdfreader.com/dl/xpdf-4.00.tar.gz
http://www.xpdfreader.com/dl/xpdf-4.00.tar.gz.sig
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
4 matches
Mail list logo
