Sgex Game - The Hummingbird

2009-05-11 Thread Manely Cmiel
inline: Manely.png

Bug#520956: Fixed in 1.090

2009-05-11 Thread Leandro Lucarella
Yes, it seems to be fixed en 1.090.
-- 
Leandro Lucarella
Integratech S.A.
4571-5252



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Служба email раcсылok

2009-05-11 Thread Ойва Степан
Можно ли экономить на рекламе?

ДА! Pеклама в интернете стоит намного дешевле стандартных видов рекламы, и 
эффективность в несколько раз выше - это доказанный факт!

Обращайтесь к нам, и Вы сэкономите свои средства.

Наш Телефон : (495)502 61 85
ICQ: 40 957 1759

Любые формы оплаты.


9menu 1.8-2 MIGRATED to testing

2009-05-11 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the 9menu source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.8-1.2
  Current version:  1.8-2

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



adesklets 0.6.1-5 MIGRATED to testing

2009-05-11 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the adesklets source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.6.1-4
  Current version:  0.6.1-5

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



vbpp REMOVED from testing

2009-05-11 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the vbpp source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.1.0-6
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



jack-tools 0.0.2-6 MIGRATED to testing

2009-05-11 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the jack-tools source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.0.2-5
  Current version:  0.0.2-6

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



vche REMOVED from testing

2009-05-11 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the vche source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.7.2-7
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



xjokes REMOVED from testing

2009-05-11 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the xjokes source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.0-12
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



tdtd REMOVED from testing

2009-05-11 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the tdtd source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.7.1-12
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



xtel REMOVED from testing

2009-05-11 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the xtel source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 3.3.0-6
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



xfonts-ay REMOVED from testing

2009-05-11 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the xfonts-ay source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.0-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Fingering Technniques That Your Lover Doesn't Want You to Know About

2009-05-11 Thread Agnus Hawksley
inline: Agnus.png

Drive Him Wild - Learn How To Talk Deirty

2009-05-11 Thread Casad Lawe
inline: Casad.png

How to Drive a Women Wild Just by Talking - Here iss Something Every Man Must Know

2009-05-11 Thread Ukosata Lem
inline: Ukosata.png

Bug#16154: marked as done (xtel: problems playing recorded sessions)

2009-05-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Mon, 11 May 2009 19:14:46 +0100
with message-id 200905111814.n4biekdj010...@kmos.homeip.net
and subject line xtel has been removed from Debian, closing #16154
has caused the Debian Bug report #16154,
regarding xtel: problems playing recorded sessions
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
16154: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=16154
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: xtel
Version: 3.1.4-3

Software is french-specific - report is in french.

Lors de la reproduction d'un enregistrement, le choix de separateur
entre SUITE et FF est insuffisant.

Il manque au moins ENVOI et RETOUR.  Un arret provoque par l'ecriture
dans la derniere position de l'ecran serait aussi souhaitable (pages
de garde, etc.).


Faire une modif en ajoutant juste un item dans le combo serait deja
une solution envisageable, et probablement pas bien dur.  Pour etre
plus ergonomique, une serie de checkboxes serait IMHO bien mieux.

(faire passer a l'auteur ?  Il n'a pas repondu a ma derniere serie de
suggestions, ou le message s'est perdu...)

-- 
Yann Dirson  ydir...@a2points.com  | Stop making M$-Bill richer  richer,
alt-email: dir...@univ-mlv.fr  | support Debian GNU/Linux:
debian-email:   dir...@debian.org  | more powerful, more stable !
http://www.a2points.com/homepage/3475232 |
-
A computer engineer's looking for a job !
-
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 3.3.0-6+rm

The xtel package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/474129 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues

---End Message---


Bug#16131: marked as done (xtel: Dumps core when problems allocating colors)

2009-05-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Mon, 11 May 2009 19:14:46 +0100
with message-id 200905111814.n4biekkh010...@kmos.homeip.net
and subject line xtel has been removed from Debian, closing #16131
has caused the Debian Bug report #16131,
regarding xtel: Dumps core when problems allocating colors
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
16131: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=16131
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: xtel
Version: 3.1.4-3

I have a 256 colors display, and some color-consuming apps running
together (xfig+xv+emacs).

When running xtel then, I get:
=
XTEL 3.1.4, Emulateur MINITEL (C)1991-97 LECTRA SYSTEMES  Pierre Ficheux
Warning: Cannot allocate colormap entry for gray65
Warning: Cannot allocate colormap entry for #d0d0d0
Warning: Cannot allocate colormap entry for #606060
xpmButtonWidget: Warning, no Pixmap defined, using default.


XTel === Erreur X: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter)

Verifiez votre environnement X, si ce comportement s'avere
etre un bug de XTel, executez XTel sous debugger, posez un
point d'arret sur la fonction xtel_X_error_handler et
envoyez le detail de la pile d'appels a pie...@rd.lectra.fr.

Merci et joyeuses Paques.

xpmButtonWidget: Warning, no Pixmap defined, using default.


XTel === Erreur X: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter)
[...]

xpmButtonWidget: Warning, no Pixmap defined, using default.


XTel === Erreur X: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter)
[...]

xpmButtonWidget: Warning, no Pixmap defined, using default.


XTel === Erreur X: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter)
[...]

xpmButtonWidget: Warning, no Pixmap defined, using default.


XTel === Erreur X: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter)
[...]

xpmButtonWidget: Warning, no Pixmap defined, using default.


XTel === Erreur X: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter)
[...]

xpmButtonWidget: Warning, no Pixmap defined, using default.


XTel === Erreur X: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter)
[...]

xpmButtonWidget: Warning, no Pixmap defined, using default.


XTel === Erreur X: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter)

Verifiez votre environnement X, si ce comportement s'avere
etre un bug de XTel, executez XTel sous debugger, posez un
point d'arret sur la fonction xtel_X_error_handler et
envoyez le detail de la pile d'appels a pie...@rd.lectra.fr.

Merci et joyeuses Paques.

create_pixmap_button: zero_lecteur: can't create Xpm pixmap
create_pixmap_button: rewind_lecteur: can't create Xpm pixmap
create_pixmap_button: stop_lecteur: can't create Xpm pixmap
create_pixmap_button: play_lecteur: can't create Xpm pixmap
create_pixmap_button: wind_lecteur: can't create Xpm pixmap
Erreur de segmentation. (core dumped)
=

I guess it's a problem with untested return codes from Xlib calls
somewhere.

For what it's worth, the backtrace from the core is:

=
#0  0x4010b774 in ?? () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
#1  0x4013c638 in ?? () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
#2  0x401219eb in ?? () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
#3  0x401327a1 in ?? () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
#4  0x80503e8 in _start ()
#5  0x804bc71 in _start ()
=

I keep the core file handy in case you need it.

-- 
Yann Dirson  ydir...@a2points.com  | Stop making M$-Bill richer  richer,
alt-email: dir...@univ-mlv.fr  | support Debian GNU/Linux:
debian-email:   dir...@debian.org  | more powerful, more stable !
http://www.a2points.com/homepage/3475232 |
-
A computer engineer's looking for a job !
-
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 3.3.0-6+rm

The xtel package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/474129 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues

---End Message---


Bug#180042: marked as done (xtel: Split xtel into xteld and xtel(-client?) packages)

2009-05-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Mon, 11 May 2009 19:14:45 +0100
with message-id 200905111814.n4biejpc010...@kmos.homeip.net
and subject line xtel has been removed from Debian, closing #180042
has caused the Debian Bug report #180042,
regarding xtel: Split xtel into xteld and xtel(-client?) packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
180042: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=180042
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: xtel
Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-06
Severity: wishlist

Hello,


It would be nice to split the xtel package, so that you could install
either the xteld server or the xtel graphical client alone. The idea is
that xteld shouldn't need to depend on X libraries because you may not
want to install them on your connection computer -- on the other hand, the
xtel client probably doesn't need to depend on ppp either.

Sincerely,


Laura


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux nutella 2.4.20-686 #1 Mon Jan 13 22:22:30 EST 2003 i686
Locale: lang=fr...@euro, lc_ctype=fr...@euro

-- no debconf information


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 3.3.0-6+rm

The xtel package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/474129 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues

---End Message---


Bug#121327: marked as done (xtel: should have separate configuration file)

2009-05-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Mon, 11 May 2009 19:14:47 +0100
with message-id 200905111814.n4biela7010...@kmos.homeip.net
and subject line xtel has been removed from Debian, closing #121327
has caused the Debian Bug report #121327,
regarding xtel: should have separate configuration file
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
121327: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=121327
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: xtel
Version: 3.3.0-3
Severity: wishlist

Hi!

I'm currently using xtel on my computer (called tintin) with xteld
running on my server (called milou). So, I need to set the serveur
option to milou.

The way to do that seems to be to use the X resource serveur. But I
don't consider this clean: the server used should depend on the machine
running the client, not on the machine where the client is displayed.

Currently, it does not work if I run xtel on tintin with the display on
milou.

So, I think there should better be an xtel system configuration file in
/etc/xtel (which should be overriden by a user configuration fine in
~/.xtel) that would be used to set the server parameter.


Regards,

Nicolas

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux Tintin 2.4.16-tintin #1 Tue Nov 27 00:58:19 CET 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR

Versions of packages xtel depends on:
ii  debconf  1.0.17  Debian configuration management sy
ii  lesstif1 1:0.93.12-4 OSF/Motif implementation released 
ii  libc62.2.4-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libjpeg626b-1.3  The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  netbase  4.06Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii  ppp  2.4.1.uus-1 Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) daem
ii  xbase-clients4.1.0-9 miscellaneous X clients
ii  xlibs4.1.0-9 X Window System client libraries
ii  xutils   4.1.0-9 X Window System utility programs

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 3.3.0-6+rm

The xtel package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/474129 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues

---End Message---


Bug#527508: marked as done (xtel: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)

2009-05-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Mon, 11 May 2009 19:14:48 +0100
with message-id 200905111814.n4biemxb010...@kmos.homeip.net
and subject line xtel has been removed from Debian, closing #527508
has caused the Debian Bug report #527508,
regarding xtel: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
527508: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=527508
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: xtel
Version: 3.3.0-6
Severity: serious

From my pbuilder build log:

...
 debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the package.
# /usr/bin/make
# Imake commands
xmkmf
make: xmkmf: Command not found
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2

You should Build-Depend on xutils-dev instead of xutils.
-- 
Daniel Schepler



---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 3.3.0-6+rm

The xtel package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/474129 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues

---End Message---


Bug#265145: marked as done (syntax highlighting present if only psgml installed, but not if tdtd is installed as well)

2009-05-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Mon, 11 May 2009 19:16:13 +0100
with message-id 200905111816.n4bigdss010...@kmos.homeip.net
and subject line tdtd has been removed from Debian, closing #265145
has caused the Debian Bug report #265145,
regarding syntax highlighting present if only psgml installed, but not if tdtd 
is installed as well
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
265145: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=265145
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: tdtd
Version: 0.7.1-11
Severity: minor

Hi,

I installed psgml (1.3.1-9), started emacs, and opened a *.sgml file. The
syntax showed up highlighted. I then installed tdtd, restarted emacs and
reopened the file, and hey presto, no more syntax highlighting!

This could be an error on my part, but I looked at the docs and it is not
clear to me what I am doing wrong.

This system is tracking sarge.

I include my .emacs file below in case it is relevant.

  Faheem.

**
(custom-set-variables
  ;; custom-set-variables was added by Custom -- don't edit or cut/paste it!
  ;; Your init file should contain only one such instance.
 '(auto-compression-mode t nil (jka-compr))
 '(case-fold-search t)
 '(confirm-kill-emacs (quote y-or-n-p))
 '(current-language-environment ASCII)
 '(ess-use-menus t)
 '(global-cwarn-mode t nil (cwarn))
 '(global-font-lock-mode t nil (font-lock))
 '(ispell-program-name aspell)
 '(latex-run-command rubber t)
 '(mouse-wheel-mode t nil (mwheel))
 '(preview-auto-cache-preamble t)
 '(preview-default-option-list (quote (displaymath floats graphics 
textmath sections psfixbb)))
 '(preview-image-type (quote dvipng))
 '(preview-required-option-list (quote (active dvips counters auctex)))
 '(require-final-newline t)
 '(show-paren-mode t nil (paren))
 '(whizzy-use-write-annotate nil t))
(custom-set-faces
  ;; custom-set-faces was added by Custom -- don't edit or cut/paste it!
  ;; Your init file should contain only one such instance.
 '(font-latex-math-face class color) (background light)) (:background 
unspecified :foreground magenta
 '(show-paren-match-face class color)) (:foreground turquoise :weight 
bold
 '(show-paren-mismatch-face class color)) (:foreground red :weight 
bold)

;;turn on reftex
(add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'turn-on-reftex)   ; AUCTeX LaTeX mode
(setq reftex-enable-partial-scans t)
(setq reftex-save-parse-info t)
(setq reftex-use-multiple-selection-buffers t)
(setq reftex-plug-into-AUCTeX t)

;; Auto fill mode
(setq-default auto-fill-function 'do-auto-fill)

;; Set font sizes
(setq default-frame-alist
  '(
;; (background-color . #00)
;;   (foreground-color . LightGray)
(font
 . -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal-*-15-*-75-75-c-90-iso8859-1)
(width . 110)
(height . 60)))

(setq ess-sas-local-unix-keys t)
(require 'psvn)

**

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26.040728.1
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages tdtd depends on:
ii  emacs21 [emacsen] 21.3+1-6   The GNU Emacs editor

-- no debconf information

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 0.7.1-12+rm

The tdtd package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/358437 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues

---End Message---


Bug#506703: new version (0.1.22) for amavis-stats

2009-05-11 Thread Gokdeniz Karadag
Hi,

I have just had the time to test the package. Thanks for providing it. My
report will be rather long, sorry for it. But at the end the thing works now :D




If I remember correctly, amavis-stats prefixes itself to /usr while building.
And It seems that the package is built with --prefix=/usr.
In line 1120 of /usr/sbin/amavis-stats it looks for config file at
'/etc/amavis-stats/amavis-stats.conf'. Also, it installs
/usr/var/cache/amavis-stats and /usr/var/lib/amavis-stats directories.

There must be a configure option for the prefix.

Also it puts files in /usr/doc, no other package does this according to
debian policy. and /usr/doc/amavis-stats.txt is in fact a man file -with
horrible formatting :(
This program really sucks but there is no ready-made alternative.


The data directories (/var/{lib,cache}/amavis-stats) must be www-data owned.
And I cannot remember what original permissions were on /var/log/mail.info, but
amavis-stats must be able to read it.


The new version defaults in a daemon-like operation. So the cron.d file is
unnecessary, instead an initscript must be installed, that will directly call
/usr/sbin/amavis-stats with start|stop etc. Be aware that process renames
itself as `Amavis-Stats`


/usr/share/amavis-stats/amavis-stats.alias.conf  is similar to the apache.conf,
with added expiration instructions, it should not be present in installed 
package.

In my setup, /etc/amavis-stats/apache.conf was not linked under apache's conf.d

Also I had to fix /usr/share/amavis-stats/img link, as the current package has
an extra /usr/ prefix in all directories, in the corrected version, that link
should be pointing to correct place.

Some dependencies are missing; a dep on php and php-gd must be present for php
files. I am not very comfortable with this. People do not install web servers
on their mail servers. I would not prefer such a dep, instead I copy rrd files
 over to a apache installed machine. Can you provide a backend package that
produces rrd files, and a frontend that produces graphics ?

After all these adjustments, I managed to get graphics of virus, spam and other
activity. Yay!
Actually, the business1 theme seems like professional thingy :)

Thanks for your efforts.

Barry deFreese demis ki::
 Barry deFreese wrote:
 Gokdeniz Karadag wrote:
 Hi,

 I can test the package. Where can I find it ?

 - Gokdeniz Karadag

 Barry deFreese demis ki::
  
 Hi,

 I have a package of 0.1.22 ready to go but I am not overly familiar
 with
 using it.  Is there any chance you could do some testing for me?

 Thanks!

 Barry deFreese
 Debian QA
 

   
 Gokdeniz,

 Thanks.  I have put the .deb here for now: 
 http://people.debian.org/~bdefreese/amavis-stats/amavis-stats_0.1.22-1_all.deb


 Unfortunately it isn't apt-gettable so you will have to wget and use
 dpkg -i.  If you don't know how to do that, please let me know.  I'm
 sure there is some extraneous stuff in the package since the way it is
 configured seems to have changed significantly.  In fact the
 apache.conf file that is shipped is probably no good anymore as well
 as the cronjob probably needs modification.  Any help/suggestions you
 could give there would be greatly appreciated.

 Thanks,

 Barry

 Gokdeniz,
 
 Hi, sorry to bug you, just curious if you've had a chance to test this
 version out?
 
 Thanks!
 
 Barry deFreese



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#438250: marked as done (vche: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1))

2009-05-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Mon, 11 May 2009 19:13:53 +0100
with message-id 200905111813.n4bidrdz010...@kmos.homeip.net
and subject line vche has been removed from Debian, closing #438250
has caused the Debian Bug report #438250,
regarding vche: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
438250: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=438250
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: vche
Version: 1.7.2-7
Severity: wishlist
User: bui...@naquadah.org
Usertags: nostrip

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package with 
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip.
Final binaries are still stripped.

If you call dh_strip correctly in debian/rules, this may mean that upstream
is stripping anyway.
You should look for call to strip, ld -s or install -s which may strip binaries.


 Automatic build of vche_1.7.2-7 on octave for sid/i386 by rebuildd 0.2.2-r136
 Build started at 2007-08-15 19:47:19.026823
 **
 Reading package lists...
 Building dependency tree...
 Reading state information...
 Need to get 48.5kB of source archives.
 Get:1 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main vche 1.7.2-7 (dsc) [583B]
 Get:2 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main vche 1.7.2-7 (tar) [44.2kB]
 Get:3 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main vche 1.7.2-7 (diff) [3703B]
 Fetched 48.5kB in 0s (222kB/s)
 Download complete and in download only mode
 W: /home/staff/jd/.pbuilderrc does not exist
 I: using fakeroot in build.
 Current time: Wed Aug 15 19:47:24 UTC 2007
 pbuilder-time-stamp: 1187207244
 Building the build Environment
  - extracting base tarball [/var/cache/pbuilder/sid.tgz]
  - creating local configuration
  - copying local configuration
  - mounting /proc filesystem
  - mounting /dev/pts filesystem
  - policy-rc.d already exists
 Obtaining the cached apt archive contents
 Installing the build-deps
  - Attempting to parse the build-deps 
  - Considering build-dep debhelper ( 5.0.0)
- Trying debhelper
  - Considering build-dep libncurses5-dev ( 5.0.0)
- Trying libncurses5-dev
  - Installing  debhelper libncurses5-dev
 Reading package lists...
 Building dependency tree...
 Reading state information...
 The following extra packages will be installed:
   file gettext gettext-base html2text intltool-debian libmagic1 po-debconf
 Suggested packages:
   dh-make cvs gettext-doc
 Recommended packages:
   curl wget lynx libmail-sendmail-perl libcompress-zlib-perl
 The following NEW packages will be installed:
   debhelper file gettext gettext-base html2text intltool-debian libmagic1
   libncurses5-dev po-debconf
 debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed
 0 upgraded, 9 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
 Need to get 0B/4911kB of archives.
 After unpacking 17.0MB of additional disk space will be used.
 Selecting previously deselected package libmagic1.
 (Reading database ... 8969 files and directories currently installed.)
 Unpacking libmagic1 (from .../libmagic1_4.21-2_i386.deb) ...
 Selecting previously deselected package file.
 Unpacking file (from .../archives/file_4.21-2_i386.deb) ...
 Selecting previously deselected package gettext-base.
 Unpacking gettext-base (from .../gettext-base_0.16.1-2_i386.deb) ...
 Selecting previously deselected package html2text.
 Unpacking html2text (from .../html2text_1.3.2a-3_i386.deb) ...
 Selecting previously deselected package gettext.
[...]
 dpkg-buildpackage: binary and diff upload (original source NOT included)
 Copying back the cached apt archive contents
  - unmounting dev/pts filesystem
  - unmounting proc filesystem
  - cleaning the build env 
 - removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build//20195 and its 
 subdirectories
 Current time: Wed Aug 15 19:52:47 UTC 2007
 pbuilder-time-stamp: 1187207567
 Checking vche_1.7.2-7_i386.deb for stripped binaries...
 ---
 /tmp/vche_1.7.2-7_i386.deb/usr/bin/vche-nc: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 
 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, dynamically linked (uses shared 
 libs), stripped
 /tmp/vche_1.7.2-7_i386.deb/usr/bin/vche: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 
 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, dynamically linked (uses shared 
 libs), stripped
 /tmp/vche_1.7.2-7_i386.deb/usr/bin/vche-raw: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 
 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, dynamically linked (uses shared 
 libs), stripped
 
 ...done
 Removing result files...
 ...done
 

Bug#506703: deps for backend

2009-05-11 Thread Gokdeniz Karadag
Here are two missing dependencies for the backend part of the package

libunix-syslog-perl
librrdp-perl  (in addition to librrds-perl)


Also, I have not stated it clearly in previous e-mail, the config file must be
patched to read as following, amavis debian pkg outputs are in there.
$scan_logfile   = /var/log/mail.info



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#493413: marked as done (xjokes needs better short description)

2009-05-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Mon, 11 May 2009 19:11:44 +0100
with message-id 200905111811.n4bibioj010...@kmos.homeip.net
and subject line xjokes has been removed from Debian, closing #493413
has caused the Debian Bug report #493413,
regarding xjokes needs better short description
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
493413: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493413
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---

Package: xjokes
Version: 1.0-12
Severity: normal

Hi,

The short description for xjokes is not very informative.

There is also a typo in the long description (which could also use some 
improvement).  4 funny little program: should be 4 funny little 
programs:.


Thank you,

Barry deFreese
Debian QA



---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 1.0-12+rm

The xjokes package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/448111 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues

---End Message---