Re: library transition proposal libosip2 (was: library transition proposal libortp/ liblinphone)

* Mark Purcell [Sun, 08 Mar 2009 15:56:48 +1100]: Hi Dato, Hola! * secondly, regarding libosip2-4, it is indeed a very small transition, though it would get itself tied to the ffmpeg transition via linphone. Can you upload it to experimental first to check everything

Re: library transition proposal libosip2 (was: library transition proposal libortp/ liblinphone)

* Mark Purcell [Sat, 07 Mar 2009 12:18:01 +1100]: On Friday 27 February 2009 15:38:20 Mark Purcell wrote: [...] Awaiting endorsement from debian-release. Any news? Hello, sorry for the delay, we're a bit overloaded. Let's see: * in the first place, regarding liblinphone3 and libortp8,

Re: library transition proposal libosip2 (was: library transition proposal libortp/ liblinphone)

Hi Dato, On Saturday 07 March 2009 21:01:00 Adeodato Simó wrote: * in the first place, regarding liblinphone3 and libortp8, only linphone depends on them in testing (and are in fact provided by the same linphone source package), so any time you want to do this transition is

Re: library transition proposal libosip2 (was: library transition proposal libortp/ liblinphone)

On Friday 27 February 2009 15:38:20 Mark Purcell wrote: [...] Awaiting endorsement from debian-release. Any news? Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: library transition proposal libosip2 (was: library transition proposal libortp/ liblinphone)

On Friday 27 February 2009 15:38:20 Mark Purcell wrote: [...] Awaiting endorsement from debian-release. Any news? Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: library transition proposal libosip2 (was: library transition proposal libortp/ liblinphone)

On Saturday 07 March 2009 16:29:55 Yasuhiro Araki wrote: Hello Mark, Hi! I am afraid I had not updated information about libosip2. No problem, just wanting to ping the issue along. Actually, renewing libosip2 package does not difficult. I have concern about side effect for some packages

Re: library transition proposal libosip2 (was: library transition proposal libortp/ liblinphone)

Hello Mark, I am afraid I had not updated information about libosip2. Actually, renewing libosip2 package does not difficult. I have concern about side effect for some packages which depend libosip2. And I cannot check whole packages. Maybe, now is a good oppotunity to renew libosip2. Because

library transition proposal libosip2 (was: library transition proposal libortp/ liblinphone)

On Tuesday 24 February 2009 10:42:26 Mark Purcell wrote: liblinphone2 - liblinphone3 libortp7 - libortp8 Looks like I also have another transition to precede libortp. libosip2-3deb - libosip2-4 libosip2-3deb Reverse Depends: linphone-nox liblinphone3 siproxd siproxd linphone-nox