I thought it could be informative to forward this email to the
debian-release list, in case any NMUs may be needed. See
http://bugs.debian.org/258042 for the background...
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:19:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 12:09:32PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> it looks like that what Stephen Frost made on mips-hawking is not enough
> to bring boost back in the Needs-Build state.
> boost needs only to be built on mips in order to get into testing.
> anybody can please give it a glance?
I know there has been ongoing discussion about the effect on sarge
transitions of packages that out of date on some architectures for
which they already exist in sarge. Particularly, there seems to be
consensus that something reasonable will be done for those instances
in which packages are out o
(Diverted to -devel, as this is offtopic on -release)
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 03:11:31PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Hello.
>
> The pine-docs package which I maintain contains a document called
> "Getting Started With Email Using Pine", which is based on pine 3.96
> and it has not been updated
* Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-13 15:11]:
> using free alternatives like mutt), I think it makes little sense to
> keep pine-docs in the archive. Could it be removed from testing and
> unstable?
File a bug against the ftp.debian.org pseudo package.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECT
Hello.
The pine-docs package which I maintain contains a document called
"Getting Started With Email Using Pine", which is based on pine 3.96
and it has not been updated since 1997.
As the pine package which is distributed in ftp.debian.org is mainly
for people who is already familiar with pine (
hi all,
it looks like that what Stephen Frost made on mips-hawking is not enough
to bring boost back in the Needs-Build state.
boost needs only to be built on mips in order to get into testing.
anybody can please give it a glance?
cheers
domenico
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 08:59:44AM +0200, Martin
On 2004-08-13 Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 10:36:01PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The following frozen packages need to have updated versions available in
> > testing:
> > slang
> > gnutls11
> > libgpg-error
> You have to add gcc-3.4 to that list. The g
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 09:16:57AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-08-12 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > now with gcc resolved this makes sense again, this has been ready for
> > quite some time.
> > easy pcsc-lite/1.2.9-beta5-1 muscleframework/1.1.5-4 etoken/0.3.9-2
> > pc
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 10:36:01PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The following frozen packages need to have updated versions available in
> testing:
>
> slang
> gnutls11
> libgpg-error
You have to add gcc-3.4 to that list. The gcc team bumped the libgcc1
shlib.
Bastian
--
Power is danger.
On 2004-08-12 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> now with gcc resolved this makes sense again, this has been ready for
> quite some time.
> easy pcsc-lite/1.2.9-beta5-1 muscleframework/1.1.5-4 etoken/0.3.9-2
> pcsc-tools/1.3.4-2 opensc/0.8.1-7 xcardii/0.9.9-5
Darn, I missed two package
11 matches
Mail list logo
