The following packages are still linked against libstdc++5 in unstable.
This isn't so great, since it means people using these packages have to carry
around an extra library. It also means that the packages haven't been
recompiled
or uploaded in a *long* time.
I'd like to ask -release to
Hi Debian-Release,
I have set the severity of bug 405597 to grave. I suggest that you
remove open-cobol from testing and don't include open-cobol in the etch
release unless I get it fixed in time.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=405597
Thanks to Dennis Boone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:08 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
- If your package needs to be updated for Etch, and the version in
unstable doesn't contain extraneous changes (e.g, the version is the
same between testing and unstable), please upload your fix to
unstable and contact
Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have uploaded yaws 1.65-3 that fixes an unreported bug regarding ssl
key distribution. Please unblock it. The debdiff output is attached.
+ if [ -f yaws-cert.pem ] [ -f yaws-key.pem ] ; then
+ echo You already have /etc/yaws/yaws-cert.pem and
On 1/14/07, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, so every time a user upgrades a package, he gets to see this
message? Is that really needed?
We will fix that in future versions, but I don't think it is a problem
in etch because yaws was not part of sarge.
Torsten
--
blog:
Dear release team,
please allow display-dhammapada 0.23-3 to propagate from unstable to testing.
It is 1 day old, but it fixes one important bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=405978
Previous build 0.23-2 contains serious error which causes that this
program is simply not
Hi
Thanks Marc for the nice summary, helps me a bit :)
So, it looks like juice, maildir-bulletin, qe, qmc, shaperd and
tigr-glimmer are easy removals. Anyone interested to mail the respective
maintainers?
Yes I am on it and pinging appropriate candidates.
Cheers
Steffen
pgpITwUMD0CzY.pgp
Bart Martens wrote:
Package angrydd version 1.0.1-5 is in unstable. The differences with
testing are:
Unblocked.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
signature.asc
Sorry, I didn't notice the [X] that indicates the package isn't in
testing [1] (it would be handy if this was visible in the BTS as well,
which it doesn't seem to be). I'll read [2] for RC bugs instead.
Let's keep this issue open until kvm-11 is out though, so users know what to
expect.
Jakub Nadolny wrote:
Dear release team,
please allow display-dhammapada 0.23-3 to propagate from unstable to testing.
It is 1 day old, but it fixes one important bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=405978
Unblocked.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes -
Christian Perrier wrote:
I've no objection, but I've also not tested the installer with this font.
Basically that is up to the translators themselves.
Unblocked.
It appear that Marc had some objections because of the debhelper
compatibility level bump.
As a consequence, Thep asked me
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070114 00:37]:
-Depends: linux-patch-debian-2.6.18 (= 2.6.18-8), linux-source-2.6.18 (=
2.6.18-1) | linux-source-2.6.18 (= 2.6.18-2) | linux-source-2.6.18 (=
2.6.18-3) | linux-source-2.6.18 (= 2.6.18-4) | linux-source-2.6.18 (=
2.6.18-5) |
Hello,
aba (Cc-ed) followed the issue. So basically -4 fixes some forced FTBFS
due to bugs in the iasl code generation and load/store unaligned
accesses (#406034 and #406558) as a followup to #401153.
Now, is it worth trying to push for -4 in etch? the only package
build-depending on iasl is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have just uploaded ocamlgsl 0.5.2-1i to unstable. The former version
(0.5.1-3) has an important bugs, that this new upstream release fix. I
attach the diff between the two version.
The difference is :
* Upstream correction of bug (#406711:
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
postal
Same maintainer as logtools, maildir-bulletin, but only a few users.
postal is the kind of thing you install to commission or load-test a mail
system and then remove. It is extremely useful, but it is expected to have
just a few
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 12:36:37AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
Actually, there is another way to do it - hardcode to -dfsg for now, so
this is a change that needs to be reverted at the beginning of the Lenny
cycle. But I think it is still better then the other one, and I don't
think it hurts
Hi,
nexuiz 2.1-1 (currently in testing) contains some vulnerabilities (bug
#406400):
- client command injection;
- DoS against the server.
(more details in the bugreport)
Since this version also provides users with better multiplayer support,
since it is in sid since a month, and since Moritz
* Mattia Dongili ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070114 14:39]:
Hello,
aba (Cc-ed) followed the issue. So basically -4 fixes some forced FTBFS
due to bugs in the iasl code generation and load/store unaligned
accesses (#406034 and #406558) as a followup to #401153.
Now, is it worth trying to push for
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
nexuiz 2.1-1 (currently in testing) contains some vulnerabilities (bug
#406400):
- client command injection;
- DoS against the server.
(more details in the bugreport)
Since this version also provides users with better multiplayer support,
since it is in
Hi,
thanks for the patch. One small issue:
* Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070114 16:14]:
--- debian/changelog (revision 3362)
+++ debian/changelog (local)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-linux-2.6 (2.6.18-9) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+linux-2.6 (2.6.18.dfsg.1-9) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
The standard
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 05:35:38PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070114 16:14]:
--- debian/changelog(revision 3362)
+++ debian/changelog(local)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-linux-2.6 (2.6.18-9) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+linux-2.6 (2.6.18.dfsg.1-9)
* Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070114 15:21]:
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 12:36:37AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
Actually, there is another way to do it - hardcode to -dfsg for now, so
this is a change that needs to be reverted at the beginning of the Lenny
cycle. But I think it is still
Hi,
In 4.4.2 Upgrading aptitude
You only updating aptitude.
I think updating tasksel (hence tasksel-data) together will make less
surprize. (Proper Desktop task list ...)
- # aptitude install aptitude
+ # aptitude install aptitude tasksel
YMMV.
Osamu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Dear release team,
Would it be possible to have audacious so that we can have a decent
non-gtk 1 (and light) music player for various formats in etch?
I have been using audacious pulled from unstable and I would love to see
it in etch, since it doesn't depend on external plugins to play flac,
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 03:06:29AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
The following packages are still linked against libstdc++5 in unstable.
This isn't so great, since it means people using these packages have to carry
around an extra library. It also means that the packages haven't been
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 09:53:15AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 03:06:29AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
The following packages are still linked against libstdc++5 in unstable.
vncsnapshot
I have some minor changes queued up that I thought were not really worth
Hi Marc!
Thanks for your feedback, but it seems that something has gone wrong:
On Sam, 13 Jan 2007, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
One more thing: Can someone give us/me a feedback about the unblocking
or not unblocking of
tetex-bin 3.0-29
unblocked by luk
texlive-bin
This is a l10n-only update (Updates to the French, Dutch, German, and
Japanese translations of the debconf templates).
--
Michael Schultheiss
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hello,
Could you please hint the following packages to be upgraded in Etch? The
current versions in Sid are OK. The following are the changes from
currently available versions.
- rails ( -2 = -3 )
* fixed a regression. The -2 rails that fixes the bug includes a bad
patch by me. I think I was
Adam Majer wrote:
Hello,
Could you please hint the following packages to be upgraded in Etch? The
current versions in Sid are OK. The following are the changes from
currently available versions.
- rails ( -2 = -3 )
* fixed a regression. The -2 rails that fixes the bug includes a bad
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-13 03:35]:
The diff replaces the build-depends on tetex-bin with a build-depends on
tetex-bin | texlive-base-bin. I understand that for most of the texlive
packages, there's no clear mapping from the tetex packages. Can
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
I just uploaded jed_0.99.18-8 to unstable. Please consider hinting this
version into etch since it fixes three l10n bug reports (#395251, #400510,
and #405744) and also added an updated pt_BR translation. I am following
the request sent by Javier Fernández-Sanguino
32 matches
Mail list logo
