Re: Bug#417622: NTFS-3g way too old, can cause data corrumption in rare conditions

2007-04-03 Thread Paul Hampson
Steve Langasek wrote: > Michael, > > Please keep the Cc: list intact when replying. > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 11:01:00PM +0200, Michael Fritscher wrote: >>> From my POV, the question is not whether ntfs-3g 1.0.0 should be included >>> in >>> etch (it won't be), but whether the risk of this data

Re: please schedule a bin-nmu for fai-kernels

2007-04-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:13:44PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > > can you please schedule a bin-nmu for fai-kernels on all three archs (i386, > > amd64, powerpc), so that it gets rebuild against linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12 > > - > > tis is target for etch. > actually, i think a bin-nmu is n

Re: Bug#417622: NTFS-3g way too old, can cause data corrumption in rare conditions

2007-04-03 Thread Steve Langasek
Michael, Please keep the Cc: list intact when replying. On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 11:01:00PM +0200, Michael Fritscher wrote: > > From my POV, the question is not whether ntfs-3g 1.0.0 should be included > > in > > etch (it won't be), but whether the risk of this data loss is significant > > enough

Re: Bug#417622: NTFS-3g way too old, can cause data corrumption in rare conditions

2007-04-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:56:31PM +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > Steve Langasek a écrit : > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:41:39PM +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > >> Contact debian-release if you have some serious reason to request > >> ntfs-3g 1.0.0. inclusion into etch. > > From my

Fwd: Re: Bug#417622: NTFS-3g way too old, can cause data corrumption in rare conditions]

2007-04-03 Thread Michael Fritscher
It killed already files for me and others. It is mentioned in the forum, too: http://forum.ntfs-3g.org/viewtopic.php?t=170&highlight= Another problem is that unmounting was asyncron in these early versions, which can cause data loss, too. So I strongly advise to drop this package, if you don't wa

Re: Bug#417622: NTFS-3g way too old, can cause data corrumption in rare conditions

2007-04-03 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:41:39PM +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > >> This software is available in experimental state. >> Who knows if 1.0.0. doesn't suffer of such critical bugs ? > >> It's too recent to be included

Re: Bug#417622: NTFS-3g way too old, can cause data corrumption in rare conditions

2007-04-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:41:39PM +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > This software is available in experimental state. > Who knows if 1.0.0. doesn't suffer of such critical bugs ? > It's too recent to be included in a Debian stable release, morever, have > you experiencied any issue with this

please unblock toilet/0.1-2 and libcaca/0.99.beta11.debian-3

2007-04-03 Thread Sam Hocevar
Following the discussion about FIGlet, I uploaded a new version of TOIlet, as well as a new version of libcaca (because it declared an incorrect old conflict with figlet, unnecessarily causing them to be uninstallable together). It might be too late for libcaca but well, I'm trying anyway. unbl

X.Org unblocks

2007-04-03 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi, I uploaded these three packages today, could you add unblock hints? # bug#417564 unblock xorg/1:7.1.0-16 # CVE-2007-1667 unblock libx11/2:1.0.3-7 # CVE-2007-1351 CVE-2007-1352 unblock libxfont/1:1.2.2-2 Thanks, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: pound for etch

2007-04-03 Thread Jordi
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:41:32AM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > Well, that package is quite OK and surely with minimal changes. I can upload tonight if finally my ADSL link is working. > What I would greatly prefer, however, is for the 2.2.7-2 version to go > in. I know it is a new upstream ver

Re: please schedule a bin-nmu for fai-kernels

2007-04-03 Thread Andreas Schuldei
* Holger Levsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070403 12:06]: > Hi, > > can you please schedule a bin-nmu for fai-kernels on all three archs (i386, > amd64, powerpc), so that it gets rebuild against linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12 - > tis is target for etch. actually, i think a bin-nmu is not good enough in t

please schedule a bin-nmu for fai-kernels

2007-04-03 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, can you please schedule a bin-nmu for fai-kernels on all three archs (i386, amd64, powerpc), so that it gets rebuild against linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12 - tis is target for etch. Thanks & regards, Holger pgp4EAjRL7n6n.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: please unblock icedove 1.5.0.10.dfsg1-3

2007-04-03 Thread Alexander Sack
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 10:13:51PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 05:40:11PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > > The other change, the gnome_helpers patch is already in iceweasel, > > iceape, xulrunner. > > > Thanks for considering this ... and sorry for this late landing :/ >

Re: pound for etch

2007-04-03 Thread Michael Piefel
Am Montag, den 02.04.2007, 18:09 +0200 schrieb Jordi: > A NMU is ready in http://people.debian.org/~jordi/debian/, in case > someone wants to review + upload. Well, that package is quite OK and surely with minimal changes. What I would greatly prefer, however, is for the 2.2.7-2 version to go in.