* Otavio Salvador [Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:10:34 -0300]:
Hello,
Hi,
RM people has get in touch with me asking for which script we consider
suitable for moving into release.debian.org.
I'll note that our goal was/is to do whatever is needed to make your
situation better in this regard. I think
* Stephen Gran [Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:50:43 +]:
I'm not sure, which is why I was asking. I can see two arguments - one
that we should just move on from the broken version(s) of the library,
and another that the packaging should be made robust enough that it
doesn't try to accidentally
To view the message, please use an HTML compatible email viewer!
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es writes:
* Otavio Salvador [Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:10:34 -0300]:
Hello,
Hi,
RM people has get in touch with me asking for which script we consider
suitable for moving into release.debian.org.
I'll note that our goal was/is to do whatever is needed to make
Barry deFreese wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to upload libphysfs 1.0.1 to unstable. It is a soname
change. You are all CC'd because you have a package that
build-depends on it.
I will attempt to test build all of the packages but if any of you
know or could build your own for me it
TO ALL REVERSE DEPENDENCIES OF libphysfs: please don't recompile/upload
against libphysfs-1.0-1 until the issue mentioned below is figured out.
We will let you know.
* Barry deFreese [Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:00:34 -0500]:
Barry deFreese wrote:
Hi folks,
Hello, Barry!
It appears that all of the
Adeodato Simó wrote:
TO ALL REVERSE DEPENDENCIES OF libphysfs: please don't recompile/upload
against libphysfs-1.0-1 until the issue mentioned below is figured out.
We will let you know.
* Barry deFreese [Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:00:34 -0500]:
Barry deFreese wrote:
Hi folks,
7 matches
Mail list logo
