Nicolas Boullis wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:08:22AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Nicolas Boullis wrote:
Cheers,
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 08:03:20AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
If you are sure that there are no API changes, then please upload to
unstable and tell us when you did so we can
Sam Hartman wrote:
Hi.
Hi
This is an update on my message about the krb5 transition.
Currently, if krb5 1.7 from unstable were to migrate into testing and
if the libkrb53 binary package were maintained in testing (it
disappears from the krb5 source package between testing and
Christian Perrier wrote:
During the last meeting of the D-I 'team' (ahem) which logs can be read
from http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings, the situation
of the kernel packages wrt testing transition was raised.
Apparently, having a new kernel in testing (whether this is 2.6.30 or
Robert Millan wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 04:57:54PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:30:46PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 08:05:29PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
In the meantime, it's uninstallable (see #533216).
Any ideas on how
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
Hi mighty members of the release team,
Could you please schedule a binNMU of pidgin against
libsilc-dev (= 1.1.9-1) in order to update its binary deps?
Can you please give a bit more context as it doesn't seem obvious why
this would be needed?
Cheers
Luk
--
To
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Hello,
could you please binnmu mlt on all architectures against libsox-dev (=
14.3.0)?
scheduled, btw it would be good to mention what old binary package is
replaced by which new one.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 15:05 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
I want to fix #536489 [i|+| ] [znc] znc: Possible crash if a user is
connecting to a server and will be deleted at the same time
debdiff attached:
debian/patches/03-crash-deleted-user.dpatch | 21 +
Luigi Gangitano wrote:
Hi releasers,
I would like to ask if a fix for #524957 would be accepted in
proposed-updates. This bug, while being trivial, makes smb
authentication unusable in the current version of squid in lenny. The
fix is in sid ATM and has been repeatedly tested.
Looks good,
Niko Tyni wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 10:19:38AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
Oldstable release managers: will you accept a libarchive-tar-perl
1.38-3~etch2 upload with the diversions added, or can you suggest
another fix? What's the schedule for the Etch r9 release?
Introducing diversions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 15:05 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
I want to fix #536489 [i|+| ] [znc] znc: Possible crash if a user is
connecting to a server and will be deleted at the same time
debdiff attached:
Luk == Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes:
Luk Sam Hartman wrote:
Hi.
Luk Hi
This is an update on my message about the krb5 transition.
Currently, if krb5 1.7 from unstable were to migrate into
testing and if the libkrb53 binary package were maintained in
Luk Claes l...@debian.org (11/07/2009):
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
Hi mighty members of the release team,
Could you please schedule a binNMU of pidgin against
libsilc-dev (= 1.1.9-1) in order to update its binary deps?
Can you please give a bit more context as it doesn't seem obvious why
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On 2009-06-27, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On 2009-06-01, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On 2009-05-28, Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
xemacs21
All
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
Could this be prioritized by the involved teams (mostly kernel and
release, I'd guess) or are there already some plans for this to
happen?
There are no plans to force anything in like some propose in such
situations as there is no clear plan of the
Matthias Klose wrote:
please upload gcc-4.4 4.4.0-10 for mips, or start a new build if the build is
lost (built on June 29). the eglibc migration depends on the recent gcc-4.4
package.
Scheduled for upload.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Sam Hartman wrote:
Luk == Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes:
Luk Sam Hartman wrote:
Hi.
Luk Hi
This is an update on my message about the krb5 transition.
Currently, if krb5 1.7 from unstable were to migrate into
testing and if the libkrb53 binary
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Luk Claes l...@debian.org (11/07/2009):
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
Hi mighty members of the release team,
Could you please schedule a binNMU of pidgin against
libsilc-dev (= 1.1.9-1) in order to update its binary deps?
Can you please give a bit more context as it doesn't
Ah, that's the reason. I thought there were different source packages
involved (for libkrb53), but apparently you ask to do a gross hack to
keep the libkrb53 binary package in while migrating krb5 and its
remaining binary packages. This is possible, though I'd rather not do that.
If we would do
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:46:24PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Luk Claes l...@debian.org (11/07/2009):
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
Hi mighty members of the release team,
Could you please schedule a binNMU of pidgin against
libsilc-dev (= 1.1.9-1) in order to update its binary deps?
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
It needs quite some work to get reverse dependencies handled and getting
it built on all architectures. Both of which are the main responsability
of the kernel team...
it is mostly done, beside the strange cpio missing build dep,
Luk Claes l...@debian.org (11/07/2009):
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
From silc-toolkit_1.1.9-1/changelog:
|* libsilc and libsilcclient are now shipped in two different binary
packages
| in order to respect their SONAMEs. The -dev package depends on both
and
| has been
maximilian attems wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
It needs quite some work to get reverse dependencies handled and getting
it built on all architectures. Both of which are the main responsability
of the kernel team...
it is mostly done, beside the strange
Hi,
xfce4-weather-plugin in stable recently stopped to work, because it uses
weather.com XOAP without really respecting the API, and especially it
doesn't use a key. The version in testing correctly handles that, but
the patch is too heavy for a stable upload.
An intermediate version would be to
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Hi,
xfce4-weather-plugin in stable recently stopped to work, because it uses
weather.com XOAP without really respecting the API, and especially it
doesn't use a key. The version in testing correctly handles that, but
the patch is too heavy for a stable upload.
An
On sam, 2009-07-11 at 19:48 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Would it be possible to include it in spu and in the next stable
release?
Yes, please upload.
Done, thanks!
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Saturday 11 July 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
what are the remaining issues that you are concerned about?
The ones that prevent linux-2.6 from migrating once it would be
unblocked.
Like FTBFS of linux-modules-extra-2.6 on 3 architectures I guess? That
seemed to me like a valid reason not to
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
Like FTBFS of linux-modules-extra-2.6 on 3 architectures I guess? That
seemed to me like a valid reason not to want to migrate .29 to testing.
Also the armel linux-2.6 FTBFS:
27 matches
Mail list logo
