Processing changes file: otrs2_2.2.7-2lenny3_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:54:18PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 23:08:41 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
It is API compatible. As I said, I have rebuilt locally the 311 packages
that build-depends on libjpeg62-dev against libjpeg8-dev, so there is no
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 19:50:43 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Yes, please go ahead.
Uploaded. While I was at it I included
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libXext/commit/?id=f467d17ae5a89aa1a2b8c7260334f41e8ee2d08c
which looked like another nice to have fix.
Cheers,
Julien
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 09:32:09AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
transition first. Unfortunately the wrong 'Depends: libjpeg62-dev'
need to be fixed first. I have reported bugs to that effect.
Besides that you should have done befrore you did the change breaking
all them, obviously you
I've been trying out various linker flags on merulo and finally found
ones that got ghc6 to build on ia64. Unfortunately, that didn't still
work on the ia64 buildd.
GHC is a self-hosting compiler, meaning that it has a build dependency
on itself and uses itself to compile itself. The build
Bill Allombert wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:54:18PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 23:08:41 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
It is API compatible. As I said, I have rebuilt locally the 311 packages
that build-depends on libjpeg62-dev against
Kari Pahula wrote:
I've been trying out various linker flags on merulo and finally found
ones that got ghc6 to build on ia64. Unfortunately, that didn't still
work on the ia64 buildd.
Both stages pass successfully on merulo. On the buildd, the build
fails right at the start of stage 2 with
On 2010-02-11 19:38 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Bill Allombert wrote:
libjpeg62-dev need to be kept for LSB compatibility.
Can you point me to the section that points to that need?
http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.2.0/LSB-Desktop-generic/LSB-Desktop-generic/libjpeg62.html#LIBJPEG
It's
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-02-11 19:38 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Bill Allombert wrote:
libjpeg62-dev need to be kept for LSB compatibility.
Can you point me to the section that points to that need?
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 07:38:18PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Bill Allombert wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:54:18PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 23:08:41 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
It is API compatible. As I said, I have rebuilt locally the 311
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 19:44:58 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-02-11 19:38 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Bill Allombert wrote:
libjpeg62-dev need to be kept for LSB compatibility.
Can you point me to the section that points to that need?
On 2010-02-11 20:21 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 19:44:58 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-02-11 19:38 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Bill Allombert wrote:
libjpeg62-dev need to be kept for LSB compatibility.
Can you point me to the section that points to that
Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny8_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny8_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny8_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny8_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Hi all
I can now announce an half official statement from Kir
(who is the project manager of openvz) that they are now
dedicated to make a openvz. This is what he states:
-
Hi Ola, guys,
Thanks for the info. We have discussed this at length and
the resolution is we are all for it.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:00:18PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-02-11 19:38 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Bill Allombert wrote:
libjpeg62-dev need to be kept for LSB compatibility.
Can you point me to the section that points to that need?
Bill Allombert wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:00:18PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-02-11 19:38 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Bill Allombert wrote:
libjpeg62-dev need to be kept for LSB compatibility.
Can you point me to the section that points to that need?
Processing changes file: ajaxterm_0.9-2+etch1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing changes file: ajaxterm_0.10-2+lenny1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Facebook switched it's IM service to XMMP, so the http method provided by this
package becomes obsolete.
As a side note, reportbug told me to send this mail to this list, so I am
trusting it :)
Regards, Lisandro.
--
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
19 matches
Mail list logo
