Le dimanche 12 septembre 2010 à 14:52 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Le dimanche 12 septembre 2010 à 12:36 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit :
We could by shipping two desktop files, with one of them having
NoDisplay=true added. Do you want me to add this change? I’m afraid it’s
the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please unblock package foomatic-filters 4.0.5-3, as it fixes two l10n bugs
(and only this).
foomatic-filters (4.0.5-3) unstable; urgency=low
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please unblock package foomatic-db-engine 4.0.4-3 as it fixes a (trivial) RC
bug:
foomatic-db-engine (4.0.4-3) unstable; urgency=low
*
On Mi, 2010-09-15 at 01:53 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
In experimental you'll find a set of packages for Python3
python3.1 3.1.2+20100909-1
python3.2 3.2~a2-4
python3-defaults 3.1.2-10
python-defaults 2.6.6-2
distribute 0.6.14-3
The python3.2 package has the PEP's 3147
Am 11.09.2010 17:12, Julien Cristau schrieb:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 08:43:08 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
Am 04.09.2010 18:13, Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 12:08 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
Please add another freeze exception. The package would have been in
testing already
Hi Ernesto,
Could you please communicate trough this bugreport what is your current plan
for
the resolution of this RC bug ?
I ask because I spent a bunch of time looking for a resolution of this bug and
I
was preparing a NMU, when I finally saw the Vcs you are working in, where this
RC
tags 592243 + patch
tags 592243 + pending
thanks
Hi,
I've prepared an NMU for sendmail (versioned as 8.14.3-9.3) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. It simply declares another conflict of rmail
against masqmail.
Dear release team,
please make a freeze exception for this upload once it's accepted.
On 16/09/2010 07:56, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
Hi, release team!
Iceweasel 3.5.12 has gone to squeeze, so I think that its
localization should be there, too.
Done.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 16/09/2010 18:40, Ralph Amissah wrote:
Please unblock sisu 2.6.3-5, which contains a bug fix #596736 for Squeeze.
Unblocked.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
me...@{dogguy.org,debian.org}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 16/09/2010 20:05, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
I've attached the diff from testing to this email, and the diffstat is
below. If you prefer an upload now with the expectation of another
once I've fixed #595054, let me know.
I can unblock the attached changes (if you upload). When #595054
On 16/09/2010 08:40, Örjan Persson wrote:
Philipp Kern (pk...@debian.org) wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 02:48:08PM +, Örjan Persson wrote:
python-gevent (0.12.2-7) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
.
* Fixed a build problem with sphinx generation when no internet
connection
Hi, release team!
Iceweasel 3.5.12 has gone to squeeze, so I think that its
localization should be there, too.
MD Done.
Thanks!
--
... mpd is off
. ''`. Dmitry E. Oboukhov
: :’ : email: un...@debian.org jabber://un...@uvw.ru
`. `~’ GPGKey:
On 15/09/2010 10:55, Modestas Vainius wrote:
Speaking strictly about kdepim source package, its diff is rather big
(see diffstat below). However, given what I said above, would you grant
a freeze exception for this package (after it proves itself in unstable
obviously)? Thank you for
On 15/09/2010 10:55, Modestas Vainius wrote:
Would you grant a freeze exception for this package after it spends
some time in unstable? Thank you for considering.
Yes.
(P.S.: answer for kdepim is coming… once I find some time for it or
someone beat me to it).
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
Your message dated Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:40:15 +0200
with message-id 4c93539f.4080...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#597165: unblock: foomatic-filters/4.0.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #597165,
regarding unblock: foomatic-filters/4.0.5-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:44:38 +0200
with message-id 4c9354a6.2080...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#596913: unblock: kdeadmin/4:4.4.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #596913,
regarding unblock: kdeadmin/4:4.4.5-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:46:26 +0200
with message-id 4c935512.3010...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#596401: unblock: planner-el/3.42-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #596401,
regarding unblock: planner-el/3.42-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ejabberd. It's only a bugfix update and adds a
new debconf translation:
#v+
ejabberd (2.1.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
Your message dated Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:27:25 +0200
with message-id 4c937acd.5030...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#597106: unblock: fglrx-driver/1:10-9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #597106,
regarding unblock: fglrx-driver/1:10-9-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:30:51 +0200
with message-id 4c937b9b.9050...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#597201: unblock: ejabberd/2.1.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #597201,
regarding unblock: ejabberd/2.1.5-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 02:09:45PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 16/09/2010 20:05, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
I've attached the diff from testing to this email, and the diffstat is
below. If you prefer an upload now with the expectation of another
once I've fixed #595054, let me know.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package yafray 0.0.9+dfsg-5, as it makes the package build again
on kfreebsd-* architectures.
yafray (0.0.9+dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=medium
* QA upload.
* Store
On 15.09.2010 23:24, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 07:32:08PM +, Oliver Korff wrote:
crafty (23.3-1~squeeze1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
.
* libnuma1 had a New Upstream Version upload and is not getting
into squeeze. So I prepared a
Hi release team,
now that squeeze is frozen I thought that it is time to upgrade my
girlfriend’s laptop from lenny to squeeze, so that any bugs we find can
be fixed before the release :-) Here is the chronological upgrade report
(in case that is of use to someone):
Changed the apt-sources to
Hi,
please unblock gtk-vnc 0.4.1-4. The only change over -3 is a fix for
connecting to vino (cherry picked from upstream). Without that vinagre
won't be able to connect to remote GNOME desktops:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-libvirt/gtk-vnc.git;a=commit;h=6f211c33c2ce5d88170fa4032cd8da86c648d4d9
Quoting Joachim Breitner (nome...@debian.org):
Hi release team,
now that squeeze is frozen I thought that it is time to upgrade my
girlfriend’s laptop from lenny to squeeze, so that any bugs we find can
be fixed before the release :-) Here is the chronological upgrade report
(in case that
I sent this mail approx a week ago. I just checked the debian-release
mailing list archives and it has still not shown up on the list, so I am
resending this mail. If you have already received this mail please
forgive the noise
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 20:30 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Adam,
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 19:49 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
please unblock gtk-vnc 0.4.1-4. The only change over -3 is a fix for
connecting to vino (cherry picked from upstream). Without that vinagre
won't be able to connect to remote GNOME desktops:
Unblocked.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Your message dated Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:11:35 +0100
with message-id
1284754295.30747.913.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#596659: unblock: mdadm/3.1.4-1+8efb9d1
has caused the Debian Bug report #596659,
regarding unblock: mdadm/3.1.4-1+8efb9d1
to be marked as
Chase,
+rinputd (1.0.3-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Add dependency on openssl for certificate generation
+- Closes: #596065
+ * Remove dbg package since dbgsym package is generated automatically
+ * Update standards version to 3.9.1
+ * Prevent linking when unnecessary
+ * List missing
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock glib2.0 for squeeze.
glib2.0 (2.24.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Drop type-handling usage. Closes: #587863.
* Bump standards version accordingly.
* Ship
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
Tested the build on gabrielli, and all is in order. Don't know why
the library package was empty on mips only.
nmu hol88_2.02.19940316-9 . mips . -m hol-libary empty on mips, Closes:
Your message dated Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:27:11 +0100
with message-id
1284758831.30747.1289.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#597235: nmu: hol88_2.02.19940316-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #597235,
regarding nmu: hol88_2.02.19940316-9
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:49:01 +0100
with message-id 1284760141.1138.20.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#597207: unblock: yafray/0.0.9+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #597207,
regarding unblock: yafray/0.0.9+dfsg-5
to be marked as done.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
The 1.1.3-1 upload of ekeyd fixed #577600, a bug that made it unreliable (which
I consider RC). I have been running this fixed version for a week now and
haven't seen the problem occur.
I recommend that ekeyd be unblocked to allow this fix into
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 15:27 -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
The 1.1.3-1 upload of ekeyd fixed #577600, a bug that made it
unreliable (which I consider RC). I have been running this fixed
version for a week now and haven't seen the problem occur.
I recommend that ekeyd be unblocked to allow this
Dear Release Team,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:45:40AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Yes. You should upload to the same place, and instead of using
unstable as the target distribution, use testing or
testing-proposed-updates. Naturally, since you will be basing your
package on the version
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package shutdown-qapps
Since version 1.2.5-1 of the source package shutdown-qapps
there have been many changes in both qshutdown and
qprogram-starter. Among these
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package tomcat6
Upload includes debconf translation updates for the release goal
debconf translation languages.
Thank you,
tony
unblock tomcat6/6.0.28-6
--
39 matches
Mail list logo
