Dear release team,
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:34:08PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
The following set of packages can be updated using binNMUs:
festival jade linuxdoc-tools metacity-common:metacity mutter openjade
openjade1.3
Please hold on. The rebuilt packages are currently causing FTBFS
I have uploaded the Clojure1.4 package, which obsoletes the previous
version Clojure1.3.
Could you remove Clojure1.3 from testing and unstable?
Regards,
Daigo
--
Daigo Moriwaki daigo at debian dot org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
allegro4.4 is now in unstable, installed for all architectures except
ia64 and mips. ia64 failed with an internal compiler error and mips is
building for 12 hours now.
Am I supposed to file RM requests now or does the Release Team take
care of that?
I prepared a NMU for open-invaders that should
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org (02/06/2012):
[...]
version. Is this correct or should I refrain from uploading exim 4.80
to unstable?
It's probably OK to upload. I'll deal with consequences if there's
anything going wrong. Please upload,
libextractor3 is missing from the list of rdpends.
I've stumbled upon this as well. vdr-plugin-xineliboutput doesn't build
anymore because it depends on libextractor3 which depends in librpm2 which
depends on rpm-common (= 4.9.1.3-2) which isn't available after the upload
of the new rpm anymore.
Hello,
Thank you Holger for cc:ing me.
Le 02/06/2012 23:21, Holger Levsen a écrit :
cc:ing the gnunet maintainer as he told me he was thinking of adoptiong these
packages... (he's also aware of the upstream situation..)
I can confirm I am also interested in adopting gnunet-*.
On Samstag,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 671115 by 675836
Bug #671115 [release.debian.org] transition: mysql-5.5
671115 was blocked by: 674328 673528 667428 673263 650058 660686 674122 649955
651110 674309 672714 650060 666331 672619 672950 672716 673264 651317 674210
673262
Hello,
Daigo Moriwaki da...@debian.org (03/06/2012):
I have uploaded the Clojure1.4 package, which obsoletes the previous
version Clojure1.3.
Could you remove Clojure1.3 from testing and unstable?
get it removed from unstable, that'll propagate to testing:
Your message dated Sun, 3 Jun 2012 23:34:42 +0200
with message-id 20120603213442.ga8...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#675740: unblock: ffgtk/None
has caused the Debian Bug report #675740,
regarding unblock: ffgtk/None
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hi,
Pino Toscano p...@debian.org (02/06/2012):
A fixed qt4-x11 has been uploaded few hours ago and compiled fine on
s390x;
thanks. FTBFS on ia64 though, which I'll file right away.
a few KDE sources among the failing ones have been given back
(building fine) already, the only missing bits
Your message dated Mon, 4 Jun 2012 00:02:04 +0200
with message-id 20120603220204.gd8...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#673488: transition: ctemplate libctemplate0 -
libctemplate2
has caused the Debian Bug report #673488,
regarding transition: ctemplate libctemplate0 - libctemplate2
to be
Hello Pino,
Pino Toscano p...@debian.org (02/06/2012):
Thanks, I've uploaded poppler 0.18.4 to unstable yesterday, and it
compiled fine everywhere.
thanks.
I've pinged this morning Chow Loong Jin, and later he kindly uploaded
the arch:all poppler-sharp.
ACK.
I guess you could also
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
We would like to fix some bugs in the stable eglibc version.
One bug was supposed to be fixed in the previous upload, but it was
not due to the patch not being added to patches/series.
Hello Tobias,
Tobias Hansen tobias@gmx.de (03/06/2012):
allegro4.4 is now in unstable, installed for all architectures except
ia64 and mips. ia64 failed with an internal compiler error and mips is
building for 12 hours now.
now installed on mips. Previously I tried a give back on ia64,
Hello,
Modestas Vainius mo...@debian.org (02/06/2012):
With qt4-x11 multiarch done [1] and KDE Plasma Workspaces ready in
experimental [2], when could we expect a transition slot?
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653903 [ bug not closed
though ]
[2]
Hi,
Am 04.06.2012 00:26, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
Am I supposed to file RM requests now or does the Release Team
take care of that?
Hmm, what do you want to see RM'd?
I thought removing allegro4.2 would be the next step. But now that you
say it, that's not necessary, because
Hi Michal,
here's an extract of Artur's mail, telling us about the uncoordinated
rpm transition you started:
Artur Rona ari-tc...@tlen.pl (02/06/2012):
I've noticed that new revision of rpm source package has been
uploaded this week and introduced new binary packages names.
However,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I would like to upload the new release of owfs. As always for
this software, upstream does not really take care of symbols (some
are removed) but they always bump the soname, so
Tobias Hansen tobias@gmx.de (04/06/2012):
I thought removing allegro4.2 would be the next step. But now that you
say it, that's not necessary, because liballegro4.2-dev was replaced,
right? Also alogg and allegro-demo-data, but they're also no obstacle
for the transition, except that alogg
tag 675890 pending
thanks
Hi,
Vincent Danjean vdanj...@debian.org (04/06/2012):
Note that all reverse-dependencies are package built from owfs itself
(same source package) so the upload of this new upstream version
should not change anything for the rest of the Debian archive.
thanks for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 675890 pending
Bug #675890 [release.debian.org] transition: owfs
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
675890: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675890
Debian Bug
David Paleino da...@debian.org (01/06/2012):
However, I'd still like the transition to be put in the tracker, in the
planned section.
There, milord:
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/mapnik.html
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Helmut,
and thanks for your work on this.
Helmut Grohne hel...@subdivi.de (29/05/2012):
title = sgml-base #477751;
is_affected = .depends ~ /sgml-base \(/;
FWIW: using /sgml-base/ is OK.
is_bad = .depends ~ /sgml-base \(= 1\.1[0-9]\)/;
is_good = .depends ~ /sgml-base \(= 1\.26\+nmu2\)/;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am 04.06.2012 01:05, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
Tobias Hansen tobias@gmx.de (04/06/2012):
I thought removing allegro4.2 would be the next step. But now
that you say it, that's not necessary, because liballegro4.2-dev
was replaced, right? Also
(Adding the bug report to the loop.)
Hello,
Johannes Ring joha...@simula.no (31/05/2012):
python-ufc needs to be rebuilt against the latest swig (2.0.7). Please
binNMU it.
nmu python-ufc_2.0.5-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against swig 2.0.7, see #675207.'
if this package has such strict
Hello Brian and others,
brian.thoma...@gmail.com brian.thoma...@gmail.com (31/05/2012):
I'm hoping to get your blessing, or seal of approval, or at least an
ah, go ahead! to upload Eucalyptus to Sid in mid-June.
the safest course of actions is to get packages uploaded before
mid-June (possibly
This is resent from something I sent to Cyril Brulebois. He told me to
send it to the main release team list:
Do as you can, I guess that dealing with such a problem might be within
the scope of a freeze. Next time, please contact debian-release@
directly so that the discussion can be public
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
(Adding the bug report to the loop.)
Hello,
Johannes Ring joha...@simula.no (31/05/2012):
python-ufc needs to be rebuilt against the latest swig (2.0.7). Please
binNMU it.
nmu python-ufc_2.0.5-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild
28 matches
Mail list logo
