Hi!
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 21:15:17 +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
Hi!
The RC bug #678269 is filed against sup-mail because it fails
running with Ruby 1.8. [0]
1.8 or 1.9?
The current sup-mail fails to run with
On 27.06.2012 08:18, Rémi Vanicat wrote:
xmms2 is in new[1] and might not do it for freeze, and I was
wondering
which option I should follow.
For the record, it appears that xmms2 was accepted from NEW about 90
minutes after the above mail, so it doesn't look like there's anything
On 28.06.2012 08:27, Per Andersson wrote:
Refrasing my original (still unanswered) question: Will whatever was
uploaded to NEW before the freeze be processed or was that already
frozen before the freeze?
That's mostly at the ftp team's discretion, although I'd expect
packages with e.g. soname
2012/6/27 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
tag 679041 + pending
thanks
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 19:16 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2012/6/26 Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org:
On 26/06/2012 00:10, Bálint Réczey wrote:
I'd like to upload the latest version of wireshark to unstable.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:01:47AM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:25:11PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 07:32:20AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
I'm planning to upload dpkg 1.16.5 to unstable on the 26th, to be able
to finish cleaning up some
Hi,
I know it's late, but after quite some prodding by me and others,
upstream of gnudatalanguage is finally working on
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660260
Unfortunately so far the first two patch versions I received from
upstream didn't completely solve this issue.
They
Hi all,
On 06/28/2012 04:43 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
[...]
2012/6/27 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
Can we schedule binNMUs for netexpect, or does it require any source
changes?
Eloy will upload the new netexpect package soon.
I uploaded to unstable new netexpect packages
Hi!
As far as I remember, I have not received any response to this yet, so
I'll give a short update:
Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu writes:
Since the freeze is approaching, I would like to ask for a freeze
exception beforehand, to be able to push a new version of syslog-ng into
Wheezy, one
Looks like grass is not migrating to testing.
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=grass
Does binNMU on i386 help?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 28/06/12 14:46, Touko Korpela wrote:
Looks like grass is not migrating to testing.
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=grass
Does binNMU on i386 help?
No, libgdal-grass needs to be binNMUed because it wasn't built in a
clean/up-to-date chroot.
Scheduled.
Regards,
--
On 28.06.2012 13:46, Touko Korpela wrote:
Looks like grass is not migrating to testing.
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=grass
Does binNMU on i386 help?
grass doesn't need binNMUing, and qgis already was. It looks like
libgdal-grass could do with a binNMU indeed;
Hi there!
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:04:19 +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 15:52 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:49:34 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'wheezy'.
It installed fine in
Processing changes file: bcfg2_1.0.1-3+squeeze2_amd64.changes
Rejecting.
REJECT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ski6w-0004pm...@franck.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libphone-ui-shr_0.1+git20110827-3 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libnl3
libphone-ui-shr is currently the only remaining package still depending
on libnl2. All other packages either still
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 671931 ftp.debian.org
Bug #671931 [libnl2] libnl2 should not be released in wheezy
Bug reassigned from package 'libnl2' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #671931 to the same values
previously set
On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 07:36 -0400, Eloy Paris wrote:
On 06/28/2012 04:43 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
In the past we managed the transition ourselves by quickly updating
netexpect after wireshark.
Since netexpect does not have too many users yet and netexpect is the
only package
depending
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:18:50 +0100
with message-id 1340907530.31879.8.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#679438: nmu: libphone-ui-shr_0.1+git20110827-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #679438,
regarding nmu: libphone-ui-shr_0.1+git20110827-3
to be marked
Hi,
2012/6/27 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:45:03 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Hi,
I am still correcting FTBFS.
However, almost packages can shift to libpng 1.5.
May I upload libpng 1.5 to unstable?
Absolutely not.
OK. Does that already mean that it
18 matches
Mail list logo
