Processing changes file: atlas_3.8.4-9+deb7u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: lapack_3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb70u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing control commands:
block 704032 by -1
Bug #704032 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults 1.53
704032 was blocked by: 709576 708802 701243 709577 709570 704044 709578 701336
709579 709251 704045 709248 709861 709254 709575 709574 706648 701288
704032 was blocking: 695826
Processing control commands:
block 704032 by -1
Bug #704032 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults 1.53
704032 was blocked by: 709576 708802 701243 709577 710081 709570 704044 709579
709578 701336 709251 704045 709248 709861 709254 709575 709574 706648 701288
704032 was blocking:
Processing control commands:
block 704032 by -1
Bug #704032 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults 1.53
704032 was blocked by: 709576 708802 701243 710082 709577 710081 709570 704044
701336 709578 709579 709251 704045 709248 709861 709254 709575 709574 706648
701288
704032 was
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask for binNMUs in backports, but
let's see ;)
Please schedule a binNMU for irssi in squeeze-backports on i386. It looks like
it wasn't built in a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 704032 with 699575
Bug #704032 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults 1.53
704032 was blocked by: 710083 709576 708802 701243 710082 709577 710081 709570
704044 709579 709578 701336 709251 704045 709248 709861 709254 709575 709574
Your message dated Tue, 28 May 2013 10:23:19 +0200
with message-id 20130528082318.gr12...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#710084: nmu: irssi_0.8.15-5~bpo60+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #710084,
regarding nmu: irssi_0.8.15-5~bpo60+1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi,
On Freitag, 17. Mai 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
#704442 was closed because Wheezy wasn't released yet, now that it has been
released, what's the opinion of having dch --bpo to default wo wheezy?
ping?!?
dch --bpo - s#squeeze#wheezy#g s#bpo60#bpo70# is not as comfortable as I'd
like it to
On 27-05-13 19:53, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 26/05/13 16:10, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
For the record, a new upload happened and I've just flagged it for
acceptance.
It FTBFS again though on mips/mipsel while running the testsuite - for a
different reason this time:
Processing changes file: lapack_3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb70u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear Release Team,
A new major version of libmatio has been uploaded, which involves a SONAME
bump. The package dynare needs to be recompiled (a sourceful upload should not
be needed, see
On 2013-05-28 11:03, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Fixed package in incoming. Only diff is that it removes the ulimit
-c
unlimited call.
It also generates a lot of noise (at least I hope it's only noise):
configure | 23 +-
debian/patches/debian-changes | 142
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:17:48 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Freitag, 17. Mai 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
#704442 was closed because Wheezy wasn't released yet, now that it has been
released, what's the opinion of having dch --bpo to default wo wheezy?
ping?!?
dch --bpo -
Processing changes file: libreoffice_3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u1_s390.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1uhj4r-0002sf...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: atlas_3.8.4-9+deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1uhjiv-00069q...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: systemtap_1.7-1+deb7u1_s390.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: smcroute_0.95-1+deb7u1_s390.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
rails is sitting in NEW.
ruby-activeldap is waiting for ruby-gettext-i18n-rails, which is (surprise,
surprise) sitting in NEW.
I think it would be fairly safe to remove both rails and ruby-activeldap
from testing as well instead of waiting for transition from sid to testing
of those new
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: block -1 by 710133 710141
I'd like to request a slot for taking care of the libraw transition.
The new upstream release (in experimental) has bumped soname.
Reverse
Processing control commands:
block -1 by 710133 710141
Bug #710143 [release.debian.org] transition: libraw
710143 was not blocked by any bugs.
710143 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 710143: 710141 and 710133
--
710143: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710143
Processing changes file: systemtap_1.7-1+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1uhm78-if...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: smcroute_0.95-1+deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1uhn3b-0008lv...@franck.debian.org
-=| Julien Cristau, 23.04.2013 20:53:08 +0200 |=-
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 15:39:28 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
So does the following sound like a good plan:
1. Wait for wheezy release
2. Upload to unstable
3. Wait some time (a week? a month? migration to testing?)
4. (if no
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 11:53 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 17:19 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
The version needs to be lower than that in testing, so either -10+deb7u1
or -11~deb7u1.
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #704227 [release.debian.org] pu: freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-11~deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
704227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704227
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 18:52 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2013-05-26 13:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 00:52 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Attaching the diff.
I like the +build0 suggestion :-)
Please go ahead; thanks.
uploaded to
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #706380 [release.debian.org] pu: clutter-gst/1.5.4-1+build0
Added tag(s) pending.
--
706380: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706380
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Upstream changed ABI therefore libpqxx-4.0 package has been uploaded into
experimental just before Wheezy freeze.
There is source package name change back to libpqxx to avoid further
Processing changes file: freebsd-utils_9.0+ds1-11~deb7u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Processing changes file: clutter-gst_1.5.4-1+build0_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: lapack_3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb70u1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: smcroute_0.95-1+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hello,
unless I'm missing something, I think in the ben file you may have missed:
- In Bad: packages depending on libavcodec-extra-53, libavcodec-extra-53 and
libavutil-extra-51
- In Good: packages depending on libavcodec-extra-54, libavcodec-extra-54 and
libavutil-extra-52
signature.asc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
There is following bugs in mozc package. I would like to fix also in wheezy.
- When uim-mozc is used by root, it is the problem that starting of
GUI application is very slow.
#708608
-
Processing changes file: atlas_3.8.4-9+deb7u1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1uhsfz-ad...@franck.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
clone 701243 -1
Bug #701243 [src:aptitude] aptitude: ftbfs with GCC-4.8
Bug 701243 cloned as bug 710208
710208 was blocked by: 703980 701377
710208 was blocking: 704032
Added blocking bug(s) of 710208: 704032; removed blocking bug(s) of 710208:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unblock 710208 by 704032
Bug #710208 [src:aptitude] aptitude: FTBFS with Boost 1.53
710208 was blocked by: 704032
710208 was blocking: 701377 703980 704032
Removed blocking bug(s) of 710208: 704032
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing changes file: clutter-gst_1.5.4-1+build0_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: clutter-gst_1.5.4-1+build0_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: clutter-gst_1.5.4-1+build0_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Processing changes file: clutter-gst_1.5.4-1+build0_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: clutter-gst_1.5.4-1+build0_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: clutter-gst_1.5.4-1+build0_s390.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:18 AM, José Manuel Santamaría Lema
panfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
unless I'm missing something, I think in the ben file you may have missed:
- In Bad: packages depending on libavcodec-extra-53, libavcodec-extra-53 and
libavutil-extra-51
- In Good: packages
37 matches
Mail list logo
