Package: release.debian.org
PostBooks has multiple source packages. Specifically, there is
src:postbooks (the client) and src:postbooks-schema-(empty|quickstart|demo)
The client can only be used with the matching postbooks-schema version
Is there an automated way to ensure these packages (and
Your message dated Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:42:03 +0200
with message-id 20131007084203.gc29...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#725671: different source packages, co-ordinated
release to jessie
has caused the Debian Bug report #725671,
regarding different source packages, co-ordinated release to
Control: tag -1 wheezy moreinfo
Hi,
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@debian.org (2013-10-07):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
I'd like to propose an upgrade of opencv.
opencv distributed in wheezy includes source code of
Processing control commands:
tag -1 wheezy moreinfo
Bug #725661 [release.debian.org] pu: opencv/2.3.1+dfsg-1
Added tag(s) wheezy and moreinfo.
--
725661: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725661
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 09:33:51AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
If you are (or intend to become) an active porter for the lifetime of
jessie, then please send a signed email explaining your involvement in
the port to the Release Team debian-release@lists.debian.org before
1st of October 2013.
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:07:25PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
+++ Niels Thykier [2013-10-02 09:45 +0200]:
armel: Wookey (DD), Gatis Visnevskis (!DD), Nobuhiro Iwamatsu (DD), Steve
McIntyre (DD)
armhf: Jeremiah Foster (!DD, but NM?), Wookey (DD), Justus Winter (!DD),
Lennart Sorensen (!DD),
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 01:13:27AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
you dropped the following binary package from the yaml-cpp source
package:
libyaml-cpp0.3
It appears it is still depended on by the following packages:
[...]
| opencolorio: libopencolorio1 [amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vtadj-0005qt...@franck.debian.org
Steven Chamberlain:
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=kfreebsd-9
Updating kfreebsd-9 makes 5 non-depending packages uninstallable on
i386: cuse4bsd-dkms, fuse4bsd-dkms, kfreebsd-headers-486,
kfreebsd-headers-686, kfreebsd-headers-xen
Note that britney tests i386 first,
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy2_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy2_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy2_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vtdux-0002dh...@franck.debian.org
On 2013-10-07 14:08, Robert Millan wrote:
Steven Chamberlain:
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=kfreebsd-9
Updating kfreebsd-9 makes 5 non-depending packages uninstallable on
i386: cuse4bsd-dkms, fuse4bsd-dkms, kfreebsd-headers-486,
kfreebsd-headers-686,
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vtdj3-0004ni...@franck.debian.org
Hi Cyril,
(adding ftpmaster in CC).
Le lundi, 7 octobre 2013 01.57:42 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
looking at the testing summary page for d-i, I noticed win32-loader is
blocked from automatic migration. I'm not sure whether we want to
keep it that way but at least the 0.7.4.9 release currently
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy2_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vtfmf-0003n2...@franck.debian.org
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 11:52 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 04:26 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org (2013-09-05):
I'd like to see the possibilities of updating TTYtter in stable. The
goal is to make TTYtter work
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #721921 [release.debian.org] pu: package ttytter/2.0.1-1+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
721921: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721921
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Processing changes file: ttytter_2.1.0-1~deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vtfph-0007oi...@franck.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
The pre-1.0 versions of the OTR plugin are very broken for all
software (xchat, irssi, etc) and are considered insecure as OTRv1 is
susceptible to downgrade attacks (if my memory is correct).
I
Hi,
On Sonntag, 6. Oktober 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
debian-edu itself is a little more complicated, as the new version adds
a dependency on the new package from debian-edu-config, so we'd have to
take the new versions together (or neither). I'd still like to have more
team discussion
Hi,
tl;dr: I support Antoine's proposal to drop from Squeeze and Wheezy
any OTR client or plugin that supports both OTRv1 and OTRv2.
I strongly doubt we're still shipping anything that supports v1 only,
but it would be wise to check.
OTRv1 is susceptible to downgrade attacks (if my memory is
Adam D. Barratt:
I guess this part will require manual handling by -release? (CCing)
Otherwise we'd have to make those packages kfreebsd-any...
It'd need a force-hint, which says ignore any installability issues
created by migrating this source package and only applies to the
particular
On 2013-10-07 15:55:26, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
(Probably OT as far as the release team is concerned: it might be
worth filing CVE's against the clients that still support v1 and v2.
Antoine, do you want to ask the OTR developers what's their take
on it?)
I wouldn't bother, personnally. It
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 20:00 +, Robert Millan wrote:
Adam D. Barratt:
I guess this part will require manual handling by -release? (CCing)
Otherwise we'd have to make those packages kfreebsd-any...
It'd need a force-hint, which says ignore any installability issues
created by
Control: tags -1 + squeeze pending
Control: retitle -1 RM: irssi-plugin-otr -- RoM; security issues
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 21:14 +0200, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
The pre-1.0 versions of the OTR plugin are very broken for all
software (xchat, irssi, etc) and are considered insecure as OTRv1 is
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + squeeze pending
Bug #725731 [release.debian.org] RM: irssi-plugin-otr/0.3-2
Added tag(s) squeeze and pending.
retitle -1 RM: irssi-plugin-otr -- RoM; security issues
Bug #725731 [release.debian.org] RM: irssi-plugin-otr/0.3-2
Changed Bug title to 'RM:
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013 23:59:44 +0200
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
it doesn't appear you coordinated the libtorrent-rasterbar{6,7}
transition with the release team, but I've set up a tracker anyway:
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libtorrent-rasterbar7.html
Ideally
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 release.debian.org
Bug #725633 [libgtg0] libgtg0: depends on obsolete libotf-trace1
Bug reassigned from package 'libgtg0' to 'release.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions gtg-trace/0.2+dfsg-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug
Adam D. Barratt:
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 20:00 +, Robert Millan wrote:
Adam D. Barratt:
I guess this part will require manual handling by -release? (CCing)
Otherwise we'd have to make those packages kfreebsd-any...
It'd need a force-hint, which says ignore any installability issues
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 09:52:17AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
This is a friendly reminder. If you are listed below, then the listed
packages of yours will be automatically removed from testing within 15
days. The first batch of automatic removals will happen in about 8
days.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu wheezy
Hi,
(first off, sorry for being so late. I would understand punting that
until 7.3, etc.)
due to check's being broken (#712140) and netcfg's trying to use its
pkgconfig file in its
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 725748 wheezy
Bug #725748 [release.debian.org] pu: package netcfg/1.108
Added tag(s) wheezy.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
725748: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725748
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
here's another tiny update I'd like to see in stable. Due to a simple
error in the state machine, asking the installer to perform a full
search (“2nd pass”) to find an ISO
Hi,
On Dienstag, 8. Oktober 2013, Bill Allombert wrote:
So while it is possible that the _maintainer_ is not needing a friendly
remainder, other interested third-party might.
anyone interested in a package can opt-in via the PTS...
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is
Hi KiBi,
Ansgar opened #714063 a while back for us and there was some discussion about
this bug on the debian-python list at the time.
The choices appear to be limited to:
(a) upload translate-toolkit with support for translating subtitle files
disabled
(b) upload an older version of
On Tuesday 08 October 2013 01:51:41 Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Dienstag, 8. Oktober 2013, Bill Allombert wrote:
So while it is possible that the _maintainer_ is not needing a friendly
remainder, other interested third-party might.
anyone interested in a package can opt-in via the
36 matches
Mail list logo
