Bug#841930: marked as done (nmu: jack-audio-connection-kit_1:0.125.0-1+b1)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:33:00 + with message-id <920e4140-3f36-f4ee-2656-e4c1031f9...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: nmu: jack-audio-connection-kit_1:0.125.0-1+b1 has caused the Debian Bug report #841930, regarding nmu: jack-audio-connection-kit_1:0.125.0-1+b1 to be marked as

Bug#841927: marked as done (nmu: check_0.10.0-3)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:33:00 + with message-id <069a7699-a1e0-b52d-59ec-03a692141...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: nmu: check_0.10.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #841927, regarding nmu: check_0.10.0-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#841921: marked as done (nmu: binutils_2.27-9)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:31:00 + with message-id <1d4e5ce7-4368-ddfc-cedc-b642ca435...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: nmu: binutils_2.27-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #841921, regarding nmu: binutils_2.27-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#841839: marked as done (nmu: kannel-dev_1.4.4-3)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:32:00 + with message-id <6e2221d5-fdcc-9d99-092f-c8c454470...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: nmu: kannel-dev_1.4.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #841839, regarding nmu: kannel-dev_1.4.4-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#841941: marked as done (nmu: mlton_20100608-5.1)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:29:00 + with message-id <2de23ef2-20d4-7f56-51bf-638d71ee1...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: nmu: mlton_20100608-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #841941, regarding nmu: mlton_20100608-5.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#841939: marked as done (nmu: ocamlgraph_1.8.6-1)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:29:00 + with message-id <41cd2622-784e-828e-cc71-43f1a94ba...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: nmu: ocamlgraph_1.8.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #841939, regarding nmu: ocamlgraph_1.8.6-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#841940: marked as done (nmu: antlr_2.7.7+dfsg-7)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:30:00 + with message-id <03980ccd-5e66-a7cb-3b9c-2e6029348...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: nmu: antlr_2.7.7+dfsg-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #841940, regarding nmu: antlr_2.7.7+dfsg-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#841203: marked as done (nmu: flex_2.6.1-1)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:27:00 + with message-id and subject line Re: nmu: flex_2.6.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #841203, regarding nmu: flex_2.6.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#841942: marked as done (nmu: psicode_3.4.0-6)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:26:00 + with message-id <30ec6ee4-b314-ca09-88b9-c8c88d392...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: nmu: psicode_3.4.0-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #841942, regarding nmu: psicode_3.4.0-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#841946: marked as done (nmu: libint_1.1.6-2)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:25:00 + with message-id <856fba57-f2ce-850e-7316-170a9f5f2...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: nmu: libint_1.1.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #841946, regarding nmu: libint_1.1.6-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#841956: marked as done (nmu: boost1.61_1.61.0+dfsg-3)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:24:00 + with message-id and subject line Re: nmu: boost1.61_1.61.0+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #841956, regarding nmu: boost1.61_1.61.0+dfsg-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#841948: marked as done (nmu: madness_0.10-8)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:25:00 + with message-id <8dc298af-e3b4-b1bf-389a-93111e49e...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: nmu: madness_0.10-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #841948, regarding nmu: madness_0.10-8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Re: Next d-i release

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 03:33:03PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Since linux vs. fat/efi is no longer an issue, I'm tempted to prepare > a new d-i release soonish. I'll probably freeze udebs in the upcoming > hours or days, and try to figure out what to do with packages sitting > in

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: ark_4.14.2-2+deb8u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ebook-speaker_2.8.1-1+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: kdepimlibs_4.14.2-2+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: kdepimlibs_4.14.2-2+deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT

Bug#841979: jessie-pu: package minissdpd/1.2.20130907-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-CC: Thomas Goirand Hi, The attached debdiff fixes #816759 (minissdpd: CVE-2016-3178 CVE-2016-3179) for jessie. Both CVEs are taged 'no-DSA' by the

Bug#841863: transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 24/10/16 12:20, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 24/10/16 00:04, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 23/10/16 23:54, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >>> Rdepends as I remember them (coccia is currently missing dak due to the >>> ongoing ftp-master move): >>> >>> eztrace-contrib >>>

Bug#841911: transition: pari

Hi, On 24/10/16 13:44, Bill Allombert wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear release team, I would like to upgrade PARI to the upcoming 2.9.0 > stable version, which bump the soname of

Processed: Re: Bug#841863: transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #841863 [release.debian.org] transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 841863: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841863 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#841767: jessie-pu: package ebook-speaker/2.8.1-1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 18:47 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 19:45 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Control: tags -1 - confirmed > > > > > On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 15:10 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Hello, >

Bug#841462: jessie-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.75-2+2016h

Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 14:45 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 11:42:39 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > Another month, another tzdata update. > > > As usual, I've added a quilt patch for the Olson db, this time 2016h, > > > to

Processed: Re: Bug#841767: jessie-pu: package ebook-speaker/2.8.1-1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #841767 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package ebook-speaker/2.8.1-1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 841767: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841767 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#655976: marked as done (queue-viewer: support binary debdiffs)

Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:11:51 +0100 with message-id <1477343511.32722.49.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#655976: queue-viewer: support binary debdiffs has caused the Debian Bug report #655976, regarding queue-viewer: support binary debdiffs to be marked as done.

Bug#841681: jessie-pu: package ark/4:4.14.2-2

Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 11:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 10:22 +0200, Maximiliano Curia wrote: > > I would like to fix the bugs #800021 and #770840 of the ark package in > > stable. > > > > The current

Processed: Re: Bug#841681: jessie-pu: package ark/4:4.14.2-2

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #841681 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package ark/4:4.14.2-2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 841681: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841681 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#841462: jessie-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.75-2+2016h

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #841462 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.75-2+2016h Added tag(s) pending. -- 841462: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841462 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#841961: nmu: ocaml_4.02.3-7

Control: forcemerge 841938 -1 On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 22:07 +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote: > Please rebuild ocaml against the pie-enabled compiler chain, to fix an FTBFS > of scilab package: Please don't file duplicate requests. Regards, Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#841961: nmu: ocaml_4.02.3-7

Processing control commands: > forcemerge 841938 -1 Bug #841938 [release.debian.org] nmu: ocaml_4.02.3-7 Bug #841961 [release.debian.org] nmu: ocaml_4.02.3-7 837359 was blocked by: 837350 841938 837359 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 837359: 841961 837659 was blocked by:

Bug#841961: nmu: ocaml_4.02.3-7

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Please rebuild ocaml against the pie-enabled compiler chain, to fix an FTBFS of scilab package: ocamlopt -o modelicac -I

Processed: Re: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#841947: libboost-*1.61-dev: Please build static libs with -fPIC

Processing control commands: > block -1 by 841956 Bug #841947 [src:boost1.61] libboost-*1.61-dev: Please build static libs with -fPIC 841947 was not blocked by any bugs. 841947 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 841947: 841956 -- 841947:

Bug#841956: nmu: boost1.61_1.61.0+dfsg-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Please rebuild boost1.61 against the pie-enabled compiler chain, to fix this FTBFS of psi4 package: [100%] Linking CXX executable

Bug#838242: transition: imagemagick

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 13/10/16 09:45, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 12/10/16 17:13, roucaries bastien wrote: >>> Uploaded new version waiting for green light >> >> Go ahead. > > Can you look at pythonmagick? That is the last

Processed: nmu: madness_0.10-8

Processing control commands: > block 837699 by -1 Bug #837699 [src:madness] libmadness-dev: Please build libMAD*.a with -fPIC 837699 was not blocked by any bugs. 837699 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 837699: 841948 -- 837699:

Bug#841948: nmu: madness_0.10-8

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Control: block 837699 by -1 nmu madness_0.10-8 . ANY . unstable . -m "Recompile static libraries with PIE" RC bug #837699 should be closed when the binNMUs are in unstable.

Bug#841946: nmu: libint_1.1.6-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Control: block 837686 by -1 nmu libint_1.1.6-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Recompile static libraries with PIE" RC bug #837686 should be closed when the binNMUs are in unstable.

Processed: nmu: libint_1.1.6-2

Processing control commands: > block 837686 by -1 Bug #837686 [libint-dev] libint-dev: Please build static libraries with -fPIC 837686 was not blocked by any bugs. 837686 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 837686: 841946 -- 837686:

Processed (with 1 error): This is the same bug

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 837659 src:ocaml Bug #837659 [ocaml-nox] hivex: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled Bug reassigned from package 'ocaml-nox' to 'src:ocaml'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #837659 to the same values previously set

Processed: nmu: psicode_3.4.0-6

Processing control commands: > block 837569 by -1 Bug #837569 [libpsi3-dev] libpsi3-dev Please build static libraries with -fPIC 837569 was not blocked by any bugs. 837569 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 837569: 841942 -- 837569:

Bug#841942: nmu: psicode_3.4.0-6

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Control: block 837569 by -1 nmu psicode_3.4.0-6 . ANY . unstable . -m "Recompile static libraries with PIE" RC bug #837569 should be closed when the binNMUs are in unstable.

Processed: nmu: mlton_20100608-5.1

Processing control commands: > block 837567 by -1 Bug #837567 [src:mlton] mlton: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled 837567 was not blocked by any bugs. 837567 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 837567: 841941 -- 837567: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837567

Bug#841941: nmu: mlton_20100608-5.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Control: block 837567 by -1 nmu mlton_20100608-5.1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Recompile static libraries with PIE" RC bug #837567 should be closed when the binNMUs are in unstable.

Bug#841939: nmu: ocamlgraph_1.8.6-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Control: block 837456 by -1 nmu ocamlgraph_1.8.6-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Recompile static libraries with PIE" RC bug #837456 should be closed when the binNMUs are in unstable.

Bug#841940: nmu: antlr_2.7.7+dfsg-7

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, The antlr package currently in unstable isn't built with -fPIC, leading to FTFS for some of its reverse dependencies, such as nco:

Processed: nmu: ocamlgraph_1.8.6-1

Processing control commands: > block 837456 by -1 Bug #837456 [src:frama-c] frama-c: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled 837456 was not blocked by any bugs. 837456 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 837456: 841939 -- 837456:

Processed: Also block the binNMU requests

Processing control commands: > block -1 by 841921 837350 Bug #841938 [release.debian.org] nmu: ocaml_4.02.3-7 841938 was not blocked by any bugs. 841938 was blocking: 837359 Added blocking bug(s) of 841938: 837350 and 841921 -- 841938: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841938

Bug#841938: Also block the binNMU requests

Control: block -1 by 841921 837350 ocaml seems to require updated binutils for building, also express this here. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er

Bug#841938: nmu: ocaml_4.02.3-7

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Control: block 837359 by -1 nmu ocaml_4.02.3-7 . ANY . unstable . -m "Recompile static libraries with PIE" RC bug #837359 should be closed when the binNMUs are in unstable.

Processed: nmu: ocaml_4.02.3-7

Processing control commands: > block 837359 by -1 Bug #837359 [src:ocaml] ocaml: Please build libasmrun.a and libcamlrun.a with -fPIC 837359 was blocked by: 837350 837359 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 837359: 841938 -- 837359:

Bug#841929: marked as done (nmu: libctl_3.2.2-2)

Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:10:28 +0200 with message-id <66972310-af12-3f9a-b5b2-d65c0925c...@debian.org> and subject line Re: nmu: libctl_3.2.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #841929, regarding nmu: libctl_3.2.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: libctl binnmu blocks 837568

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 837568 by 841929 Bug #837568 {Done: Thorsten Alteholz } [libctl-dev] libctl-dev: Please build libctlgeom.a with -fPIC 837568 was not blocked by any bugs. 837568 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of

Bug#841930: nmu: jack-audio-connection-kit_1:0.125.0-1+b1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Control: block 837423 by -1 nmu jack-audio-connection-kit_1:0.125.0-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Recompile static libraries with PIE" RC bug #837423 should be closed when the binNMUs are in

Processed: Re: libfl_pic.a needs more than a binNMU

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #841203 {Done: Adrian Bunk } [release.debian.org] nmu: flex_2.6.1-1 Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #841203 to the same values previously set -- 841203:

Processed: nmu: jack-audio-connection-kit_1:0.125.0-1+b1

Processing control commands: > block 837423 by -1 Bug #837423 [src:jack-audio-connection-kit] jack-audio-connection-kit: Please build libjack.a with -fPIC 837423 was not blocked by any bugs. 837423 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 837423: 841930 -- 837423:

Bug#841203: libfl_pic.a needs more than a binNMU

Control: reopen -1 > > #837658 is different from many other PIE issues: > > This is a _pic.a library that includes the non-PIC objects instead of > the PIC objects it should contain. > > A binNMU with -fPIE would not fix the root cause that this library is > supposed to contain PIC code. >

Bug#841929: nmu: libctl_3.2.2-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, A rebuild of libctl seems sufficiant to fix #837568: > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libctlgeom.a(geom.o): >

Bug#841927: nmu: check_0.10.0-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Control: block 837445 by -1 nmu check_0.10.0-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "recompile static libraries with PIE" RC bug #837445 should be closed when the binNMUs are in unstable.

Processed: nmu: check_0.10.0-3

Processing control commands: > block 837445 by -1 Bug #837445 [src:check] check: Please build libcheck.a with -fPIC Bug #841757 [src:check] mpc: FTBFS: relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.rodata' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC 837445 was not blocked by any bugs.

Re: ppc64el porter situation

On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 09:01:26PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Are they developing new powerpc products? AMCC? I have no idea. Maybe not. Freescale certainly seems to be. > Their latest products are also pretty ARM. That they are. > Are you talking about new e6500 SoCs, or are you only

Bug#841921: nmu: binutils_2.27-9

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Control: block 837350 by -1 nmu binutils_2.27-9 . ANY . unstable . -m "recompile static libraries with PIE" RC bug #837350 should be closed when the binNMUs are in unstable.

Processed: nmu: binutils_2.27-9

Processing control commands: > block 837350 by -1 Bug #837350 [src:binutils] binutils: Please build libbfd.a with -fPIC 837350 was not blocked by any bugs. 837350 was blocking: 837359 Added blocking bug(s) of 837350: 841921 -- 837350: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837350

Bug#841911: transition: pari

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear release team, I would like to upgrade PARI to the upcoming 2.9.0 stable version, which bump the soname of libpari-gmp-tls4 to libpari-gmp-tls5. libpari-gmp-tls5 is in the NEW

Bug#841863: transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit

On 24/10/16 00:04, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 23/10/16 23:54, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> Rdepends as I remember them (coccia is currently missing dak due to the >> ongoing ftp-master move): >> >> eztrace-contrib >> hwloc-contrib >> starpu-contrib >> pycuda > > Do they build fine with CUDA

Re: Please add force hint to enable SSPACE testing migration

Hi, On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 09:08:15AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > please add a force-hint to add the testing migration of > >sspace 2.1.1+dfsg-2 > > While sspace is arch all it has an unsatisfiable Depends: bowtie on i386 > which seems to block the testing migration. I have no idea in