Bug#860022: Bug#859935: Bug#860022: unblock: bsd-mailx/8.1.2-0.20160123cvs-3.1 (pre-approval)

Robert Luberda: > Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> >>> Mind you, I am also open to reviewing his proposal of >>> adding those headers even with -a (letting -a override the >>> auto-generated ones when there is a conflict). > > I was thinking how to implement this functionality, and during that I >

Bug#860022: Bug#859935: Bug#860022: unblock: bsd-mailx/8.1.2-0.20160123cvs-3.1 (pre-approval)

Thorsten Glaser wrote: > >> Mind you, I am also open to reviewing his proposal of >> adding those headers even with -a (letting -a override the >> auto-generated ones when there is a conflict). I was thinking how to implement this functionality, and during that I realized that it actually would

Bug#860276: jessie-pu: package glibc/2.19-18+deb8u8

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear stable release managers, I would like to upload a new glibc package for the next jessie release. Here is the changelog with some additional comment: * Update from upstream

Bug#856639: jessie-pu: package imagemagick

Hi On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:48:46PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On 2017-03-03 8:14, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > imagemagick bug #844594 also affects jessie and it's a regression in > > jessie compared to wheezy. Since there's a steady stream of > >

Bug#860265: (pre-approval) unblock: apt-cacher-ng/2-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please approve the upload of new version of apt-cacher-ng. See #860243 for details. Here is a minimum viable patch included below. This is made under protest because I still consider the

Unit4 Users List

Hi, We would like to learn your interest in acquiring our recently updated *Unit4 Users List* which helps you to improve your business campaign. *We have other Innovation information also like*: PeopleSoft, NetSuite ERP, SAP ERP, Microsoft Dynamics GP, Sage 100 ERP, Microsoft Dynamics NAV,

Bug#860243: jessie-pu: package apt-cacher-ng/0.8.0-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello, I would like to upgrade the apt-cacher-ng version in Stable ASAP. See attachment for the overview of the proposed changes. Please note that it does not fully resolve

Bug#860242: unblock: neovim/0.1.7-4

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package neovim This upload includes fixes for CVE-2017-{5953,6349,6350}. unblock neovim/0.1.7-4 -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.0 APT prefers unstable-debug

Re: Coordinated tzdata uploads between wheezy + jessie?

On 2017-04-13 11:33, Alastair McKinstry wrote: On 13/04/2017 10:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 2017-04-12 15:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: I assumed tzdata would go into jessie-updates quickly. Maybe I should have waited before doing the upload to wheezy. It wasn't at all clear to me that

Re: Coordinated tzdata uploads between wheezy + jessie?

* Adam D. Barratt [Thu Apr 13, 2017 at 12:03:26PM +0100]: > On 2017-04-13 11:03, Michael Prokop wrote: > >* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [Thu Apr 13, 2017 at 11:48:56AM +0200]: > >>On 13/04/17 11:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >>> Publishing things via -updates is not zero-effort so is not necessarily >

Re: Coordinated tzdata uploads between wheezy + jessie?

On 2017-04-13 11:03, Michael Prokop wrote: * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [Thu Apr 13, 2017 at 11:48:56AM +0200]: On 13/04/17 11:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > Publishing things via -updates is not zero-effort so is not necessarily done > for every update. Completely understandable. ACK,

Re: Coordinated tzdata uploads between wheezy + jessie?

On 13/04/2017 10:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2017-04-12 15:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> I assumed tzdata would go into jessie-updates quickly. Maybe I should >> have >> waited before doing the upload to wheezy. > > It wasn't at all clear to me that this round of updates (not just >

Bug#859599: unblock: qemu/1:2.8+dfsg-4

12.04.2017 20:25, Niels Thykier wrote: [] >>> Just to be sure, are you recommending 1:2.8+dfsg-4 or that we go with >>> upstream's 2.8.1 release? >> >> Historically, for some reason I don't remember what, we >> kept the "major" upstream version and source in qemu and >> used just a patch

Re: Coordinated tzdata uploads between wheezy + jessie?

* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [Thu Apr 13, 2017 at 11:48:56AM +0200]: > On 13/04/17 11:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On 2017-04-12 15:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> I assumed tzdata would go into jessie-updates quickly. Maybe I should have > >> waited before doing the upload to wheezy. > >

Re: Coordinated tzdata uploads between wheezy + jessie?

On 2017-04-13 10:48, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 13/04/17 11:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 2017-04-12 15:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: I assumed tzdata would go into jessie-updates quickly. Maybe I should have waited before doing the upload to wheezy. It wasn't at all clear to me

Bug#859876: unblock (pre-approval): python-tornado/4.4.3-1

Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Ondrej Novy: > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > Hi, > > 2017-04-12 19:49 GMT+02:00 Ivo De Decker : > >> Looks like you forgot the diff. Could you send it? >> > > yep, sorry for it, attaching now. > Ack, please go ahead and remove the

Processed: Re: Bug#859876: unblock (pre-approval): python-tornado/4.4.3-1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Bug #859876 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): python-tornado/4.4.3-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed. -- 859876: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859876 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#859872: marked as done (unblock (pre-approval): flask/0.12.1-1)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:50:00 + with message-id <67d2479b-eb00-1487-791e-7667717dc...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#859872: unblock (pre-approval): flask/0.12.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #859872, regarding unblock (pre-approval): flask/0.12.1-1 to be marked as

Re: Coordinated tzdata uploads between wheezy + jessie?

On 13/04/17 11:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2017-04-12 15:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> I assumed tzdata would go into jessie-updates quickly. Maybe I should have >> waited before doing the upload to wheezy. > > It wasn't at all clear to me that this round of updates (not just tzdata

Re: Coordinated tzdata uploads between wheezy + jessie?

On 2017-04-12 15:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: I assumed tzdata would go into jessie-updates quickly. Maybe I should have waited before doing the upload to wheezy. It wasn't at all clear to me that this round of updates (not just tzdata but libdatetime-timezone-perl as well) actually

Re: Resolving the kernel debug symbols vs signing problem

Ben Hutchings: > [...] >> >> I am probably missing something here, but wouldn't it be possible to go >> back to the original -dbg (as a "worst case" option) and defer these >> changes to buster? Not saying I like it, I just want to know whether I >> missed something. > > We could do, but do you

Processed: Re: unblock (pre-approval): flask/0.12.1-1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #859872 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): flask/0.12.1-1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 859872: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859872 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#859872: unblock (pre-approval): flask/0.12.1-1

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Uploaded and built. Thanks. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový Email: n...@ondrej.org PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B