Re: Planning for 12.6/11.10

On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 01:07:17PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > The final bullseye point release 11.10 (and therefore also 12.6 for > versioning) should be soon after 10th June, when security team support > will end. > > Please indicate availability for: > > Saturday 15th June >

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 01:07:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > As we had to postpone 12.6, let's look at alternative dates. > Can do all, I think, Andy (amaca...@debian.org) > > Adam >

Re: Planning for 12.6

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 06:04:17PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability for: > > 7 April > 13 April > 20 April > > Thanks, > Should be available for all these Andy > -- > Jonathan Wiltshire

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 09:25:06PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > It's time to set a date for 12.5 (taking account of the emergency .4) and > 11.9. I expect this to be the penultimate update for bullseye before LTS. > > Please indicate availability for: > > Saturday 3rd February

Re: Releasing linux/6.1.52-1 bookworm-security update without armel build, Image size problems

On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 11:42:45AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi > > On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 11:13:56AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > If we're now reaching the final limit and if it was foreseeable that we > > would reach that limit, then yes it would have made sense to drop armel > > *before*

Re: 12.1 planning

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 08:21:54AM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2 is the weekend of 30th September 2023. > Please indicate your availability for: > > 23 Sep > 30 Sep (preferred) > 7 Oct > > Thanks, > Subject to willingness of others to

Re: 11.4 planning

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 08:31:23PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > We're (again) running behind in getting the next point release for > bullseye sorted, and I know we're about to run into the Deb{Camp,Conf} > period. I think the possible dates that make sense are: > > - July 2nd (means

Re: 10.8 planning

On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 02:38:13PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > It's that time again, when we should get 10.8 out. > > Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for > the following: > > - January 30th (would mean we would have to freeze next weekend, so a > bit

Re: Release status of i386 for Bullseye and long term support for 3 years?

On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 07:55:11PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > Dear release team > > There seems to be only one maintainer. > Still true as far as I can see - others have stepped up to test i386 executables but no more developers. > Is i386 going to be supportable for

Release status of i386 for Bullseye and long term support for 3 years?

Dear release team Having participated in the current discussion about 32 bit releases and lifetimes in Linux Weekly News (lwn.net) - what's the status of i386 for the lifetime of Bullseye? There seems to be only one maintainer. Is i386 going to be supportable for the next 3 1/2 years and

Re: d-i-netboot-images package outdated (was Re: Debian Installer Stretch RC 5 release)

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 08:45:47AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Holger Levsen (2017-06-13): > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:19:17AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > Known bugs in this release > > > == > > [...] > > > See the errata[2] for

Re: HPPA and lenny

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:06:04AM +0100, Jürgen Leibner wrote: On Sunday 14 December 2008 00:07 Peter Palfrader wrote: Hi, while discussing the state of our infrastructure among some members of DSA and the security team we once more realized how badly hppa was doing. First concerns

Re: Etch in the hands of the Stable Release Managers

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Etch is in the hands of the Stable Release team.

A couple of mirror changes which will hit the UK over the next couple of months. The joint university mirror at mirror.ac.uk will shut down in July when its funding is cut. There is currently an alternative at mirrorservice.org (University of Kent, Canterbury/University of Lancaster).

Re: why is alpha a release candidate?

On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 06:38:05PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit : So the release criteria require buildd redundancy. And yet, half the release candidate archs still don't have it. It gets marked in yellow on http://release.debian.org/etch_arch_qualify.html.

Re: BIND 8 deprecation for the release notes

On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:30:39PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Sure, but python2.5 is not really usable: almost all the python modules a= re compiled only for python2.4. For postgresql you are right and I'm wrong, but I suppose that there are other examples

Re: lilypond plans

On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 07:05:01PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Currently lilypond 2.8.7 is in unstable. It is blocked waiting for its own timelimit and for guile-1.8 to finish building on other archs and migrate itself. If you want to get a 2.8.* release in, wait. If Etch is released

Re: Multiarch support (was Moving 32-bit libraries to (/usr)/lib32 on amd64)

On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 03:42:48AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Will ia32-libs on ia64 still be supported for the etch release? Matthias I hope so or something that works just like it :) Commercial anti-virus product Sophos SWEEP is mandatory on Unix/Linux/Windows where I work. On

Re: Drop the minor release number

On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:24:38AM -0400, sean finney wrote: On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 05:05:09PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: Then we would have Debian 4.0 for etch, 4.1 for etch stable release 1, 4.2 for etch stable release 2, 4.2a for etch stable release 2 with a minor CD mastering fix

Re: RFC on mysql 4.1 in sarge

On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:01:58AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:49:13AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: ... I see the same three options. Joey has said he is working on a final woody point release for the last weekend in May; you'll probably need to coordinate with

Re: Sarge and real i386-boxes

On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:02:26AM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote: Goswin von Brederlow said: Is anyone still using real i386 cpus? I have one in fully working condition - but only with 6M of memory :( [Will probably run 0.93rc1 fine, though :) ] Quite a lot of smaller PC104 class embedded CPU's