On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 09:03, Jun MO wrote:
> 1) I hope there will still be the original
> w(1)/last(1)/lastb(1)/lastlog(1)/faillog(1)
> tools which can still read *old* format utmp/wtmp/lastlog in Debian at
> least for
> a while after switch to Y2038-safe replacements. Those tools can read
>
I
On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 at 05:04, Paul Gevers wrote:
> With procps migrated to testing, dose [1] is reporting two more packages
> that weren't on our radar: open-vm-tools and guymager. Can you have a
>
Both these packages do not use any symbols from the old library and their
binary packages
do not
OK, open-vm-tools doesn't even use the library so that's an easy fix.
On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 at 15:50, Craig Small wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 at 05:04, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
>> With procps migrated to testing, dose [1] is reporting two more packages
>> that weren't on our ra
On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 at 05:04, Paul Gevers wrote:
> With procps migrated to testing, dose [1] is reporting two more packages
> that weren't on our radar: open-vm-tools and guymager. Can you have a
> look and help the maintainer with migrating to the new version of
> procps? open-vm-tools has a
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 19:50, Paul Gevers wrote:
> That's (in general) sub-optimal for the release team. We try hard to
> avoid entangling transitions and therefor we try to finish transitions
> sooner rather than later. My preference would be that you NMU (minimal
> changes) now; the maintainer
#1024218 - apitrace - patch available
#1024219 - cpu-x - patch available at upstream git
#1024220 - deepin-screen-recorder - nil
#1024221 - intel-gpu-tools - patch available upstream, version issues
#1024223 - obs-advanced-scene-switcher - Done!
#1024224 - openscap - Done!
#1024225 - veyon - nil
(added the bug report for igt)
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 08:29, Craig Small wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 07:46, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
>> An actual upload. If the maintainer isn't doing it, I think an NMU is
>> appropriate if you're sure of the fix.
>>
> Ah, I thought
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 07:46, Paul Gevers wrote:
> An actual upload. If the maintainer isn't doing it, I think an NMU is
> appropriate if you're sure of the fix.
>
Ah, I thought you were the igt maintainer :)
I'll have a go recreating it and uploading it tonight. I'm pretty confident
about the
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 05:54, Paul Gevers wrote:
> The issue is that src:intel-gpu-tools is a key packages but currently
> unfixed. Having procps migrate to testing now would cause it to be
> instantaneously RC buggy, but because it is key, we can't simply remove
> it from bookworm. Can you help
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
The procps library is now finally changing. Over 20 years ago there was
a library to assist with the procps binaries but the API wasn't very
good nor not really intentioned for use
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package net-snmp
[ Reason ]
net-snmp is not moving into bookworm due to a regression with
pyagentx. However there is reason to believe this is due to
a race condition in
Thanks for looking after this Raphael! This will stop a lot a bug reports
about why does the process not get found.
- Craig
On Sun, 5 Sep 2021, 01:01 Raphael Hertzog, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, 04 Sep 2021, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 12:02 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
I have just got a bug report for WordPress about a messed up symlink in
one of the theme packages #986085. As a result, I'd like to change this
unblock from 5.7.1+dfsg1-1 to 5.7.1+dfsg1-2
The singular change between these two is fixing the symlink for
wordpress-theme-twentytwentyone
-
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Please unblock package wordpress
Currently Wordpress in Bullseye is 5.6.1 and is vulnerable to CVE-2021-29450
reported in bug #987065
+++ procps-3.3.17/debian/changelog 2021-04-06 17:17:53.0 +1000
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+procps (2:3.3.17-5) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Add break/replace for conflicting manpages-fr-extra Closes: #986276
+
+ -- Craig Small Tue, 06 Apr 2021 17:17:53 +1000
+
procps (2:3.3.17-4) unstable
gt; > On Tue, 2020-10-13 at 21:30 +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> > > The security release in deb10u1 made EXTEND-MIB read-only
> > > to close a security hole (CVE-2020-15862/Bug #9651166)
> > > However this meant the cacheTime and execType could not be
> > >
ade EXTEND-MIB read-only which meant
+it was not possible to set the timeout of the cache. This patch
+allows administrator to set the value in the snmpd.conf file.
+Closes: #969508
+
+ -- Craig Small Mon, 07 Sep 2020 07:16:17 +1000
+
net-snmp (5.7.3+dfsg-5+deb10u1) buster-security; ur
.org/debian/net-snmp/pipelines
On Mon, 21 Oct. 2019, 5:32 am Paul Gevers, wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> On 15-10-2019 07:41, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > On 15-10-2019 01:15, Craig Small wrote:
> >> I'll have to build a new version of net-snmp including the library to
> >> fix at le
ue, 15 Oct 2019 at 07:24, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> On 14-10-2019 04:27, Craig Small wrote:
> > Hi Paul (and others),
> > I think I see the problem, the wiki has two places for transition.
> >
> > https://wiki.debian.org/TransitionBestPractices which spe
- Craig
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 07:27, Craig Small wrote:
> Hi,
> Source only uploads get automatically rejected so someone needs to fix
> that then. I originally did upload source only for net-snmp but got the
> reject message.
>
> I never have run a soname change throug
Hi,
Source only uploads get automatically rejected so someone needs to fix
that then. I originally did upload source only for net-snmp but got the
reject message.
I never have run a soname change through experimental for any of my
packages before, is this a new thing?
On Mon, 14 Oct. 2019, 6:49
of 5.1.1 patches
+ * Fix XSS security hole in comments Closes: #924546 CVE-2019-9787
+
+ -- Craig Small Sun, 24 Mar 2019 09:20:02 +1100
+
wordpress (5.0.3+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release
diff -Nru wordpress-5.0.3+dfsg1/wp-admin/about.php wordpress-5.0.4+dfsg1/wp-admin
I probably should have stated it in the initial email but if you are asking
what my preference is, it would be to have WordPress 5.0.4 in Buster.
The difference between 5.0.4 and 5.0.3 currently in Buster is the security
fixes.
- Craig
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package wordpress
WordPress 5.0.3 has a security bug #924546 which was fixed in upstream
version 5.1.1 [1]
Sid has 5.1.1 which has this fix, however it also has all the
--- procps-3.3.9/debian/changelog 2014-09-28 09:45:14.0 +1000
+++ procps-3.3.9/debian/changelog 2015-03-07 08:12:02.0 +1100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+procps (2:3.3.9-9) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * pmap: output with unreadale /proc/1/smaps Closes: #775624
+
+ -- Craig Small csm...@debian.org Sat
for this fix, I can change the trigger
line only, but it is a second preference.
- Craig
--
Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint:5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package wordpress
Wordpress 4.0 which is currently in Jessie has several
security bugs, see upstream announcement at
https://wordpress.org/news/2014/11/wordpress-4-0-1/
for
just a case of ensuring that 1:3.3.10-1 does not move into
Jessie and it's all ok? Wouldn't merely a RC bug stop that?
Is there something more to this problem I'm missing? I get its not
the ideal situation.
- Craig
--
Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
) explained a bit too.
2%3.3.9-1 is on its way.
- Craig
--
Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint:5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
.
Apologies for the noise, you've got enough release worries to deal with
without people like me doing what I did.
I'll put libprocps4 into experimental with some adjustments for the top
that everyone seems to hate (but that's not a RC problem).
- Craig
--
Craig Small (@smallsees) http
.
- Craig
--
Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint:5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
/changelog 2013-03-28 21:14:02.0 +1100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+procps (1:3.3.3-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * 3.3.3-3 Fix ps crash with large process groups Closes: #702965
+
+ -- Craig Small csm...@debian.org Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:03:15 +1100
+
procps (1:3.3.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
/commit/a45dace4b82c9cdcda7020ca5665153b1e81275f
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
signature.asc
Description
.
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package psmisc
unblock psmisc/22.19-2
psmisc 22.19-2 is a minimal change to 22.19-1 that fixes a bug for
kFreeBSD systems (see #687829) where they don't shutdown cleanly.
and ps ax being the main two to test)
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
(probably
that means scheduling a transition to libprocps1)
Yes, I now know where the two changes were.
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939
Closes: #691847
+ * Stop SIGFPE on vmstat at times Closes: #677903
+ * Upstream took freebsd bug patch
+
+ -- Craig Small csm...@debian.org Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:26:52 +1100
+
procps (1:3.3.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version
diff -Nru procps-3.3.4/debian/clean procps-3.3.5/debian
its making a 3.3.4-2 with a debian patch to reverse the API
and then do.. something.
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938
because the package name has changed to libproc1.
Ideally I'd like 3.3.4 gone but I think its too late for that, so some
things depending on libproc0 may go strange.
- Craig
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691847
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall
that weren't in
3.2.7-8 or earlier)
- Craig
--
Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
http://www.enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
http://www.debian.org/ Debian GNU/Linux, software should be Free
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
but for very good reasons I can no
longer remember (perhaps that conffiles need to be only for a single
package) it no longer has a printcap.
- Craig
--
Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.enc.com.au/ MIEE Debian
!
- Craig
--
Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.enc.com.au/ MIEE Debian developer
csmall at : enc.com.au ieee.org debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hello,
I have just uploaded lprng 3.8.28-2 which fixes a minor but security
related bug #286391. I have only made enough changes to fix this bug
which is a patch to a shell script and so, i hope, will not cause too
much headache for you guys.
- Craig
--
Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418
45 matches
Mail list logo
