On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 08:23:47PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > >I thought it would stay in sid > >and not be put into the frozen set of packages. > > I don't understand what you mean by this. I thought that: New package goes into SID = no real problem. The frozen set of packages come from testing, not Sid, so as long as procps wasn't moved from Sid to testing, then it would not mess up the "don't change libraries" stage we're in now.
So Jessie has 1:3.3.9-7 and Sid has 1:3.3.10-1 and when the freeze comes its all based on Jessie which is 1:3.3.9-7 which doesn't have the API change. Isn't just a case of ensuring that 1:3.3.10-1 does not move into Jessie and it's all ok? Wouldn't merely a RC bug stop that? Is there something more to this problem I'm missing? I get its not the ideal situation. - Craig -- Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
