On 09/12/2013 07:50 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 16:52:54 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
But anyway the big thing that still needs to happen AFAICS is
fixing the ucto dependency of frog. This can either be fixed by
reuploading ucto similar to the others or changing frog's build
On 09/11/2013 06:02 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 05:06:03PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Hi,
two more testing removals related to the libav9 transition:
- libavg 1.7.1-3 fails to build for unrelated boost reasons. Popcon is
virtually non-existant.
-
On 09/09/2013 11:39 PM, Jérôme Vouillon wrote:
On 09/09/2013 17:03, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2013-09-09 15:44, Jérôme Vouillon wrote:
So, basically, when the binary packages produced by some source package
are all taken over by another package, these binaries will usually be
automatically
On 09/06/2013 06:37 PM, Nicholas Breen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 11:42:55PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 20:16:20 -0700, Nicholas Breen wrote:
I'd like to launch a very small transition for an ABI bump in src:xbae,
which does have a renamed package (libxbae4 -
On 09/07/2013 01:04 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Hi,
Hi
I've just uploaded telepathy-logger 0.8.0-2 in unstable.
Could you please start the binNMU for the level 1 (empathy, gnome-shell
and telepathy-logger-qt).
They have been scheduled.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 09/06/2013 02:37 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2013-09-04 18:57:17, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 17:31:34 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
I've successfully rebuild acoustid-fingerprinter 0.6-1 against libav9.
Can you trigger a binNMU?
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at
On 09/06/2013 04:03 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
The binNMUs for performous failed on ia64, mips(el) and s390(x) due to
#721577. Could they be given back please? On mips(el) boost 1.54.0-3 is
not yet installed, so a dep-wait is needed there.
given back and dep-wait set.
Cheers
Luk
--
To
On 09/06/2013 05:06 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org schrieb:
#720814 motion
Scheduled for removal from testing.
Since libav dropped the (transitional?) ffmpeg package, we have some more
packages that need to be ported / fixed:
On 08/31/2013 02:54 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:48:56AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
A number of packages are involved in both libav and libx264 transitions.
Do you want to do both of them at the same time, or serialized?
I've successfully rebuild vxl against
Hi Joost
There are quite some syntax errors in the ben files you provided, like
missing 'is_' and missing ';'. Apparently you did not wait for an answer
and already uploaded all packages, that's not how it it supposed to
work... But anyway the big thing that still needs to happen AFAICS is
fixing
Hi Jay
Your plan looks good except that I think it would be better to have
libtiff5-dev provide libtiff-dev and not introduce a proper libtiff-dev.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 08/29/2013 11:52 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Hi,
Hi
Could you also please rebuild the following package that are currently
in experimental:
Done.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 08/26/2013 10:14 PM, Pino Toscano wrote:
Alle domenica 25 agosto 2013, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto:
On 2013-08-25 15:03, Luk Claes wrote:
On 08/25/2013 02:25 PM, Pino Toscano wrote:
So, given that things are getting stuck because of us, I'm getting
prodded in different channels, different
On 08/27/2013 05:26 PM, Pino Toscano wrote:
Alle martedì 27 agosto 2013, Luk Claes ha scritto:
With the hints Luk added this morning basically almost everything
migrated, except some sources split of kdemultimedia: libkcddb and
kio-audiocd; kdemultimedia should be hinted out of testing
On 08/25/2013 02:25 PM, Pino Toscano wrote:
Hi,
Alle lunedì 12 agosto 2013, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto:
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 20:08 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
Alle domenica 11 agosto 2013, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto:
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 14:10 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
That said, we are
Hi
Please start the transition and let this bug know when you uploaded to
unstable.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 08/24/2013 06:39 PM, Lifeng Sun wrote:
there was a bug in cernlib_20061220+dfsg3-3 that made paw FTBFS on all
architectures except amd64, would you please binNMU paw against
cernlib_20061220+dfsg3-4?
nmu paw_1:2.14.04.dfsg.2-9 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against cernlib'
Set a dep-wait on the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi
Please accept the updated nfs-utils package for the next point release. It
fixes some nasty bugs: one security issue (DNS reverse lookup), one segfault,
one hang and one major NFSv4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/11/2013 03:03 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Luk Claes l...@debian.org (11/05/2013):
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu
Hi,
Please accept the updated nfs-utils package
On 07/28/2012 02:35 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 13:51:31 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Hi,
open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3 was uploaded to fix an RC bug in
the
package (#679886). It has now aged for 11 days without problems discovered.
It must be noted
On 07/28/2012 02:57 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 14:42:46 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
On 07/28/2012 02:35 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
The changes in -2 are out of scope for the freeze IMO.
Can you be more specific please?
Specifically I mean the open-vm-tools 2:8.8.0
On 07/15/2012 04:59 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi Luk,
Hi KiBi
I would be very pleased if you could communicate a little about your
unblocks. Particularly, tasksel is a /slightly/ delicate package as
we're trying to get d-i beta 1 out. Unblocking it without talking to
anyone about it really
Hi,
while working on the dreaded dependency on consolekit (#665987) I
found a much
more severe problem (#680409) and fixed both. I don't think we should
release
without a fix to #680409 because that bug opens a whole can of worms.
We've had
a lot of problems with acpi-support and other power
fixing
the FTBFS problem for scim-chewing earlier.
Please let me know if I may do another upload to make it build with gtk3.
The debdiff attached which make it build against gtk3 and fixing
lintien warnings.
Best regards,
-Andrew
2012/7/6 Luk Claes l...@debian.org:
On 07/05/2012 10:06
On 07/05/2012 10:06 PM, Andrew Lee wrote:
Dear release team,
Please unblock scim-chewing 0.3.4-2 which has fixed a FTBFS problem
#676009 without other changes.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On 06/22/2012 04:31 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:32:15PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 06/22/2012 05:34 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Step 1: upgrade/dist-upgrade with ia32-libs (wine, ...) held back
Step 2: dpkg --add-architecture i386 apt-get update
Step 3:
On 06/22/2012 05:44 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please don't rush the changes in order to make the freeze date.
Getting exceptions for updates introducing the new artwork won't be
an issue (well, unless you leave them until the week before release,
but don't do that :P).
On 06/22/2012 09:04 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 14:50:44 -0400, Mike Miller wrote:
I'd like to upload the latest version of openconnect to unstable.
Updating from 3.20 to 4.00 brings a new ABI with a new soname for
libopenconnect.
Unless the current version is
On 06/05/2012 12:48 AM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Hi,
On 04/06/12 22:40, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
It was not known before today (unfortunately the gem2deb test suite did
not include any UTF-8 control files). Fixed now in gem2deb 0.2.15 (just
uploaded).
The fix looked good, thanks.
Could
On 05/28/2012 08:57 PM, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [120528 14:22]:
hurd-i386
-
Is there time to add it to testing and get it out of
{break,fucked}_arches? Would it make sense to release if it was still
in break_ and/or fucked_arches?
On 05/19/2012 05:00 PM, Riku Voipio wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:57:03AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
As everyone keeps claiming there is no armel buildd location redundancy,
I don't have much motivation to keep ancina running. It's ignored anyway.
Would you mind packaging ancina
Hi
As everyone keeps claiming there is no armel buildd location redundancy,
I don't have much motivation to keep ancina running. It's ignored anyway.
Cheers
Luk
On 05/19/2012 10:28 AM, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2012, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 06:00:18AM
On 03/05/2012 11:08 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2012-03-05 10:49, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
peter green plugw...@p10link.net (05/03/2012):
Yes. See:
http://release.debian.org/britney/update_excuses.html#openjdk-6
(The sparc part will go away, given the build has been accepted a
few
-0.8.7b/debian/changelog
--- cacti-0.8.7b/debian/changelog
+++ cacti-0.8.7b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+cacti (0.8.7b-2.1+lenny5) oldstable; urgency=low
+
+ * lib/snmp.php: Add $max_oids parameter to snmp_walk
+Closes: #656613
+
+ -- Luk Claes l...@debian.org Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:41:35
On 01/12/2012 10:13 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
tag 653757 + squeeze confirmed
thanks
On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 19:10 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
This version fixes a security issue which the Security Team evaluated
as not warranting a DSA. Attached the diff of the proposed upload.
+nfs-utils (1
mtab file (Closes: #629420)
+
+ -- Luk Claes l...@debian.org Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:58:07 +0100
+
nfs-utils (1:1.2.2-4squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
* Build with patch d6c1b35c6b40243bfd6fba2591c9f8f2653078c0 from upstream
diff -Nru nfs-utils-1.2.2/debian/patches/17-fix-CVE-2011-1749.patch nfs
On 12/14/2011 08:55 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:54 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
The security team asked us to consider an upload to pu fixing 2 low
severity security issues (which don't warrant a DSA).
[...]
+cifs-utils (2:4.5-2+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
to prevent mtab corruption
+- CVE-2011-1678
+- CVE-2011-2724
+
+ -- Luk Claes l...@debian.org Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:21:58 +0100
+
cifs-utils (2:4.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Lintian override for the suid-root binary.
diff -Nru cifs-utils-4.5/debian/patches/CVE-2011-1678.patch cifs-utils
Hi
The following packages block the perl transition and will become testing
removal candidates soon unless the bugs get fixed:
* ifeffit (#648839)
* uwsgi (#640347)
* libdbd-interbase-perl (#648857)
* libcrypt-gcrypt-perl (#634598)
* prima (#628500)
* nginx (#649061)
* libsignatures-perl
On 11/18/2011 08:56 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 20:52:48 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
* genders (#646286): patch ready, maybe NMU?
Uploaded in the meantime.
Uploaded, but still broken.
Maybe the patch was applied without running the autotools?
Cheers
Luk
--
To
On 09/12/2011 08:24 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:46 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly)
Adam marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's
On 10/03/2011 07:20 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 12:46:13PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly)
Adam marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's
On 09/22/2011 07:55 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
tag 642390 + squeeze confirmed
thanks
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 07:37 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Ok if I upload an updated ipmitool with the following patch?
diff -u ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/patches/series ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/pa
tches/series
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi
Ok if I upload an updated ipmitool with the following patch?
diff -u ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/patches/series ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/pa
tches/series
--- ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/patches/series
Hi Scott
On 08/02/2011 05:39 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
As the drafter of the proposed release goal for Python [1], I will confess
some surprise when I read on d-d-a [2] that this had been dropped for Wheezy
without being involved any discussion or at least notification. Regardless,
On 08/02/2011 10:50 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Luk Claes wrote:
Why could wb not handle the case where one tries to binNMU on one arch
where it should be done on all archs without changing binNMU formats?
Maybe they try to tackle the binNMU arch: all packages problem
On 08/01/2011 08:22 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 15:37:43 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
e.g. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec#Binary_NMUs for ubuntus
way to handle it.
Well. Ubuntu doesn't have binNMUs, so they don't have to handle it at
all.
Why could wb not
On 07/30/2011 06:23 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
Hi Otavio
During this night I got some nice progress on the stuff planned to
debian-installer. I am adding the generated control file for review
and comments.
Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts this
On 07/28/2011 01:18 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I used some of Debcamp and Debconf time this year to discuss the
Debian Installer release process with some people and after talking
with many people it seems we agreed on the following changes on Debian
Installer release process and it would be
On 07/05/2011 03:45 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 12:30:03 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
[Please Cc me, I am not subscribed.]
Hi,
I am forwarding a discussion from debian-user. I'd love to hear an
official statement about this. AFAICS, this issue hasn't been
explicitly addressed
On 07/01/2011 10:25 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Ralf Treinen wrote:
In fact, from out point of view the DIMACS format or MAX-SAT input
format are already a specific encoding technique, and we think that
one should first find a logical specification of what exactly
On 06/05/2011 06:01 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable early this week. This will
include stable update 2.6.39.1 and restoration of aufs support for use
in Debian Live.
Stable update 2.6.39.1 includes an ABI change, so we will probably have
to change the
On 05/14/2011 10:44 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Hello Julien,
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
This is still about the fact that you're expecting all debian.org
resources to be in sync at point release time. I don't think that's
reasonable, the release process
On 05/14/2011 05:13 PM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Hello Luk,
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:43:55PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
On 05/14/2011 10:44 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
This is still about the fact that you're expecting all
On 04/05/2011 02:55 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Hi,
I would like to coordinate reduction of BDB packages since I took the
unhappy job (as I could expect) to maintain BDB in Debian after Clint
have orphaned them.
The main issue which I have encountered (in cyrus-imapd) is that the
change from
, including
a description of the goal and an indication of how progress on the
issues may be tracked
(e.g. a pointer to a set of appropriate user-tagged bugs).
# bootperformance
Advocate: Petter Reinholdsen and Luk Claes
State: confirmed
Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals
On 11/24/2010 04:27 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
Please unblock and age following packages:
user-setup
hw-detect
os-prober
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 11/15/2010 02:48 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:14:47 +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
fcitx ships data/pyPhrase.org which is not dfsg free, the document in
doc/pinyin.txt describe (in Chinese and in GBK encodinga) that this
On 11/09/2010 06:35 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:05:16 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com writes:
Well, it's more like one hundred packages, but nevertheless, a very
large number. Obviously its a trade off, just like everything else in
On 10/26/2010 06:41 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Hello,
Hi
I have prepared the otrs2 2.4.9-1 upload now. I have attached the diff
(cleaned up by unnecessary changes again, like copyright year updates
and cvs file versions) and here is the debdiff:
Kernel/Modules/AdminNotificationEvent.pm
On 10/28/2010 06:14 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Am 28.10.2010 08:08, schrieb Luk Claes:
Please notify me, if I could go ahead with my upload for Squeeze.
Thanks.
Please upload. Frankly I'm quite shocked by the general quality of the
code, but at least it improves with this changeset
On 10/25/2010 04:31 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/25/2010 10:02 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Hello Release Team,
I have just uploaded open-iscsi to unstable. It adds the feature of
iSCSI Boot support for NICs that have native iSCSI support.
Please allow this upload to propogate to Squeeze.
On 10/25/2010 05:06 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/25/2010 04:56 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
[...]
This particular case I would be tempted to unblock though.
Then, go ahead :)
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:30:50AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Give it more time for testing in unstable then.
That's one of the things that's being considered, if you'd carefully
read the thread.
Set to age-days 15.
I find some of the things mentioned in this thread quite low... though
On 10/17/2010 04:47 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Luca Falavigna, le Sun 17 Oct 2010 16:41:31 +0200, a écrit :
Julien Danjou a...@debian.org
XCB Developers x...@lists.freedesktop.org
Jamey Sharp sharp...@debian.org
Josh Triplett j...@freedesktop.org
libpthread-stubs0 (U)
That's expected
On 10/13/2010 12:24 PM, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
Hi! Please consider unblocking openvpn. It fixes and RC bug, a bug in one of
Debian's patches (IPv6) and some other fixes in the upstream release.
Thanks,
Alberto
openvpn (2.1.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
On 10/13/2010 04:59 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
Hi. I need to do an upload for a krb5 security issue. However there
are a couple of other changes I could include. I'd recommend all, but
it's late enough I want explicit OK before everything besides the
security fix. I've pushed the actual
Hi
I unblocked pdsh as it fixes an RC bug:
+pdsh (2.18-8) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Drop broken runtime check for the genders library (closes: #598393)
+
+ -- Brian Pellin bpel...@debian.org Fri, 01 Oct 2010 19:49:13 -0500
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi
I unblocked sks as it fixes an RC bug and some other nasty bugs:
+sks (1.1.1+dpkgv3-5) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * add nostrip to DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS on architectures with ocaml
+bytecode. (closes: 599029)
+ * don't depend on mta etc., as mailsync is now mostly obsolete (closes:
+
On 10/11/2010 02:26 PM, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Dear release managers,
Because gcc-4.4 (=4.4.5) is now in Squeeze, gnat-4.4 (=4.4.4-5) no longer
builds from source. An updated gnat-4.4 package (merging all the packaging
changes from gcc-4.4) is available in unstable. Please unblock it so
Hi
I unblocked acct as it fixes an RC bug:
+acct (6.5.4-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * NMU with maintainer's blessing.
+ * Call autoreconf in debian/rules, add autoconf and automake to
+build-dependencies.
+Thanks to Mats Erik Andersson for the hint to how to solve this.
+
Hi
I unblocked udisks as it fixes an RC bug and some nasty bugs:
+udisks (1.0.1+git20100614-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Add 00git-fix-luks-forced-removal.patch: In the event of the forced
+removal of a crypto device, use the luks_holder property since it
is still
+available to figure
On 10/06/2010 12:47 PM, Niko Tyni wrote:
Hi release team,
Hi Niko
would you be OK with some or all of these changes for squeeze?
perl (5.10.1-15) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
.
* Include the Text::Tabs license in debian/copyright. Thanks to v.nix.is.
(Closes: #596844)
*
On 09/30/2010 12:09 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Il 10/08/2010 12.10, Luca Falavigna ha scritto:
For your convenience, I've set up a slightly modified NEW page which
only displays binary-NEW packages, you can find it at [1].
If that turns useful, I'll have a look how to properly differentiate
Hi
I unblocked libcss-perl which fixes an RC bug:
+libcss-perl (1.08-1+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non maintainer Upload
+ * Fix test failures by recompiling the grammar using a new version of
+Parse::RecDescent (Closes: #53948)
+
+ -- Don Armstrong d...@debian.org Tue, 14 Sep 2010
Hi
I unblocked pdns which fixes an RC bug:
+pdns (2.9.22-8) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Update init.d scripts and remove mysql and postgresql from the
+dependencies. The loop between mysql and pdns causes apt to fail hence
+the urgency high. (Closes: #595018)
+
+ -- Matthijs Mohlmann
Hi
I unblocked varnish which fixes an RC bug:
+varnish (2.1.3-8) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Fix random secret creation on non-Linux kernels (Closes: #596373)
+ * Urgency high due to FTBFS RC bug during squeeze freeze
+
+ -- Stig Sandbeck Mathisen s...@debian.org Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:51:20
Hi
I unblocked ddd as it fixes an RC bug and did not migrate due to a bug
in another package which got worked around now.
The changes look extensive, though it's mostly related to a license
change (from GPL2 to GPL3) and documentation. The main code change is
the added support of bash and
Hi
I unblocked encfs as it fixes a bunch of security issues. The biggest
changes are translation updates.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi
I unblocked lazarus as it fixes an RC bug and the diff looks fine.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c95a95b.30...@debian.org
On 09/19/2010 09:02 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Luca Falavigna (dktrkr...@debian.org):
Ftpmasters, is there something that can be done on your side?
This is #584909.
I'll try to see if I can provide a fix.
I know you're attending the ftpmaster meeting right now, if I properly
On 09/19/2010 12:33 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
As a consequence of all of the above, I'd like to propose modifying the
semantics of approve so that the hint can be added straight away and
the t-p-u package only becomes a valid candidate once it's available on
all the architectures on which it
On 09/13/2010 05:55 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Hi,
Hi
Please unblock the following packages that fix security issues:
unblock cacti/0.8.7g-1
unblock drupal6/6.18-1
unblock iceape/2.0.7-1
unblock iceweasel/3.5.12-2
all unblocked
unblock libgdiplus/2.6.7-3
unblocked and aged to 5 days
On Thursday 26 August 2010 22:18:23 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Trying to see how it looks like, I ended up with a big diff.
489 files changed, 27220 insertions(+), 11439 deletions(-)
Is there any sane way to review this?
Maybe the best way would be to contact upstream. In my experience,
Moin,
just finished an upload of a new (minor) upstream PDL version, package
built
fine on all architectures.
This release fixes many bugs (most tracked on upstream's sf.net tracker),
brings big improvements on the documentation side, and has a more reliable
test suite.
Could you unfreeze
i just uploaded redmine 1.0.1-1 to debian/unstable, which is a very
significant release :
* Upstream update, fixes many 1.0.0 RC bugs, see :
http://www.redmine.org/versions/show/21
* Patch for libi18n-ruby 0.4.1 support. (Closes: #592672)
* Postinst note should be an error.
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 17:54 +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 22 August 2010 16:20, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk
wrote:
[...]
The diffstat between the testing and unstable packages is
824 files changed, 133190 insertions(+), 141498 deletions(-)
which is
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi
Please remove picprog from testing-proposed-updates, it's up-to-date in testing
apart from the binary on s390 which the porter/buildd admin marked as
Not-For-Us.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi
Please remove usbview from tpu, it's binaries are deemed unusable by the
porter/buildd admin.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
* Michael Prokop m...@debian.org wrote:
Ok, 3.4.0 went through NEW (thanks) and I just uploaded 3.4.1 with
the mentioned bugfix to unstable.
Please approve fai 3.4.1 for squeeze.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
In any case, please get back to us once the package has reached its
10 days.
The xz-utils package has reached its 10 days.
unblocked, not closing bug as you still seem to speak about other changes?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 08/24/2010 03:16 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
Hi,
istanbul/0.2.2-8 fixes two RC bugs and had already aged in sid without
further reports, please unblock it. debdiff attached.
It has already migrated due to my unblock earlier today :-)
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 08/21/2010 05:41 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
busybox recently migrated to testing; this new version apparently has an
incompatibility with the netcfg version currently in testing, so we were
asked by Aurelien whether it would be possible to
On 08/21/2010 10:40 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
On 08/21/2010 05:41 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
busybox recently migrated to testing; this new version apparently has an
incompatibility with the netcfg version currently in testing, so we were
asked
On 08/15/2010 04:46 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
Hi
I investigated some differences between http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php
and what UDD sees, and found out that the unofficial RC bug tracker
seems to be missing quite a lot of bugs.
The main problem seems to be that it doesn't know
On 08/14/2010 09:04 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
Hi folks,
Hi Alexander
some time ago I uploaded keepalived 1.2.0 to debian because it was the first
(development) version with ipv6 support for ipvs. I thought/hoped development
would be faster so that we have a working/stable version with ipv6
On 08/10/2010 03:43 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:40:29AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
So I was wondering if we shouldn't have a list of user-centered
stable release goals, such as open a PDF attachment in icedove,
open an OpenDocument attachment in icedove, watch
On 08/10/2010 11:55 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:09:04PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
- Decide where user feedback will have to go; the obvious answer is the
BTS, but we need to decide whether reuse some existing (pseudo)
package or create a new one for the occasion
On 08/07/2010 12:28 PM, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote:
Le 7 août 2010 à 06:43, Philipp Kern a écrit :
On 08/06/2010 10:48 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
Finally, a silly question: looking at the bottom line of this chart, it seems
that Debian is at risk of becoming a x86/64(+ia64?)-only release[2]. Is it
On 07/15/2010 10:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
We have run into a problem with libmikmod on stable-security in the most
recent DSA. That was released with the version number 3.1.11-a-6+lenny1,
following the usual scheme.
1 - 100 of 2273 matches
Mail list logo
