-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
First we'd like to say thank you to Frans Pop by his work as Debian Installer
Release Manager and we (Jeremy, Joey and Otavio) are starting to work as a team
to manage the next Debian Installer release.
It won't be an easy task and we'll do mistakes,
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- apt really shouldn't be including the glibc upstream minor version number
in the soname at all, because glibc rigorously preserves ABI changes
within a given SONAME. This would obviously require Yet Another Soname
Change to fix, but it would
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I've produced some patches that are now merged in APT branch and I and
Michael want to know if it's a good time for a new APT upload.
I'd like to get some feedback on this, please.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Otavio Salvador [Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:03:22 -0300]:
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I've produced some patches that are now merged in APT branch and I and
Michael want to know if it's a good time for a new APT upload.
I'd like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello RM Team,
I'd like to ask for hint removal from laptop-detect since it doesn't
has an udeb anymore and then there's no reason to keep it freeze
nowadays.
Thanks in advance,
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I've produced some patches that are now merged in APT branch and I and
Michael want to know if it's a good time for a new APT upload.
Thanks in advance,
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The libgtk2.0-bin dep is a serious issue for other desktop
environments.
Wouldn't be good to split the needed binaries out of it?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thorsten Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Petter Reinholdtsen dixit:
Please consider keeping current policy and implementing the
alternatives system like the window manager stuff in the Debconf
tutorial.
I believe the reason /bin/sh replacment isn't done using alternatives
it to reduce the
Thorsten Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador dixit:
suggest you to produce a set of patches to implment it and proposed it
to debian-devel and then as release goal (on another thread).
Hm, who is “you” in this case? For me, as mksh maintainer, it's “just”
important that all
Thorsten Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is a shared/window-manager example which is what I propose for
dash, bash and mksh to share (shared/bin-sh?).
Yes, it looks very clear and easy to implement. I personally agree
about he shared question.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
On Wed Jun 06, 2007 at 15:25:31 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1181131884 time_t, Otavio Salvador wrote:
It makes Trac unusable for high volume project since it cannot handle
concurrent svn commits nicely. And it happens more frequently
Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Otavio,
At 1181021759 time_t, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to hear from SRM about they position about this upload? It's
very important to us but I'd like to get an ACK before doing it.
#425909 has no severity, so I can't give you
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
We've prepared a new package for etch backporting from 0.10.4 version
of trac three changes to fix repository syncronization problems
(#425909) and we'd like to upload it.
Hello,
I'd like to hear from SRM about they position about
)
+
+ -- Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 25 May 2007 12:31:03 -0300
+
trac (0.10.3-1etch1) stable; urgency=low
* Add 02_CVE-2007-1405_CVE-2007-1406.dpatch patch to fix CVE-2007-1405
diff --git a/debian/patches/00list b/debian/patches/00list
index a14be54..0ffb931 100644
--- a/debian/patches/00list
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe it would be better to just let known issues remain known issues at
this stage?
That is a very valid question.
My personal opinion is it's good to push those fixes now since user's
are still having security support for oldstable.
my 2c ;-)
--
Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hello there
i want to ask if this is a too big diff for inclusion in r1:
http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/4966
http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/4966?format=diffnew=4966
this is beacuse of #425909 [0] that states Trac fails miserably when
there
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Otavio,
before uploading to stable i would like to clarify if this package
should go via r1 or via security.debian.org.
r1 looks OK to me since it's not too critical.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
.dpatch patch to fix CVE-2007-1405
+and CVE-2007-1406 security issues. (Closes: #414134, #420219)
+ * Fixed typo in debian/copyright. (Closes: #422409)
+
+ -- Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 23 May 2007 21:18:41 -0300
+
trac (0.10.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream upload. Final
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 14:05:30 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
No, you don't seem to understand that I'm saying that having these
bits out of sync at release time is *unacceptable*.
OK. I am not going to argue about this. Perhaps you know some
Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now i am going to ask ... what about other software, mainly high level
software.
I am thinking something like openoffice, network-manager or samba.
I do not second this idea. Kernel upgrade will be offered due the
difficult of installation of stable
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:14:09PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frans already asked most of the questions that I had. A few others:
Is anybody else using grub2 as a default bootloader today?
Not yet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
We, the GRUB team, want to swtich to GRUB2 due many reasons, basicaly:
- easier to maintain;
- better codebase;
- multi-arch support;
- active upstream;
Our current plan is to finish the update-grub2 merging on upstream
side (being
I'm forwarding it since I forgot to readd the lists on cc.
---BeginMessage---
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wonder if we will also move from yaboot-installer to grub2-installer
on powerpc, and if you have given any thought to that migration path ?
Our main goal is to switch i386
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Our current plan is to finish the update-grub2 merging on upstream
side (being handled by Robert) and then upload a new package to
Debian. This package after moving to lenny ought be set as default
boot-loader in grub-installer (while we still offer
with grub2, and this is what has to be rewritten on
upgrade?
Yes, it's incompatible but until the user run grub-install he would
still being using the previous release.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 02:02:18PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Has grub2 been checked for obvious past issues we've had in grub
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:14:09PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hrm. What was wrong with the existing format? :/ Those are the kinds of
upstream changes that are most aggravating for administrators (or at least
for this administrator here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Please do a check on
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/grub/news/20070330T133202Z.html since
I've upload a new grub package and it fixes a very annoying bug.
Thanks in advance,
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Otavio,
Hello Steve,
Will unblock for etch if these problems get fixed.
I've just upload -26 release fixing those problems. Sorry by those
stupid mistakes. I hope all is fine with this last one.
Thank you by find them out :-)
See you.
--
: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Grub Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
grub - GRand Unified Bootloader
grub-disk - GRUB bootable disk image
grub-doc - Documentation for GRand Unified Bootloader
Closes: 414161
Changes:
grub (0.97-25
dir if rootdir is not
informed. Closes: #411109, #412334
* Applied changes from Friedemann Baitinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to savedefault-once. closes: #254475
-- Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:37:46 -0300
Diffstat:
changelog | 10
Tuomo Valkonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2007-03-09 14:08 +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
You can't force us to completely remove the current release from
Debian.
But I can stop you from distributing new releases, and possibly
get a few users complaining to you too over the ancient
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:44:05AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
I've attached a patch which implements persistent device names in
partman by checking for devices which are mounted under /target and
which have a suitable link in /dev/disk/by-id/*
I've
Robert Millan [ackstorm] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Mar 06, Robert Millan [ackstorm] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another
Robert Millan [ackstorm] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:33:47AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Robert Millan [ackstorm] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Mar 06
Robert Millan [ackstorm] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:55:45AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
With USB, you can't just boot a rescue system and repair a broken install
from there, because /dev/sda will still be your USB drive.
Of course, there are lots of hacks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Mar 06, Robert Millan [ackstorm] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another situation
that makes it much worse:
The correct solution is to make d-i use labels in fstab and to find the
root file
Hello,
I would like to ask for a hint on the sqlite3 source package.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sqlite3/news/20070306T121704Z.html
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058
Hello Herbert,
I tried to check
http://www.txtbox.xpg.com.br/myphpmoney/myphpmoney_1.3RC3+dfsg-2.1.diff.gz
but I filed to get it. I just got the -3.diff.gz file.
What's the right one?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL
calls. Closes: #409190.
* Applied patch from Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] to put xen kernels
when running inside of a domU. Closes: #404536.
-- Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:49:14 -0200
I would like ask for RM team to unlock it.
I plan another upload as soon it move
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello RM Team,
I've received a bug report[1] with an interesting patch on GRUB. This
patch adds support to GPT on it.
1. http://bugs.debian.org/407338
That would be great since it makes the Appled based Intel machines
much simple to install and
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm a bit confused by this part of the diff. I don't know what
grub_memcpy does exactly, but I guess it's roughly doing what memcpy
does. In that case, the new version is a significant change, are you
sure there are no side-effects?
Hello
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 22 January 2007 11:28, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm a bit confused by this part of the diff. I don't know what
grub_memcpy does exactly, but I guess it's roughly doing what memcpy
does
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:25:23PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
-Depends: linux-image-_KVERS_
+Depends: linux-modules-_KVERS_, kqemu-common
this is like all the newer modules are declaring their depends to the
kernel. it has
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:34:52PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:25:23PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
-Depends: linux-image-_KVERS_
+Depends: linux
default buf was being handled. Thanks Len Sorensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] by the suggestions. Closes: #403763.
-- Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 14 Jan 2007 23:20:48 -0200
And the diff between both is very small:
diff -u grub-0.97/debian/patches/savedefault.diff
grub-0.97/debian/patches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
There're some new releases of gspca and those was basically support to
new webcams models. We would like to ask for approval to Etch the new
release and also request a new upload of linux-modules-extra-2.6.
gspca has no reverse dependency and
Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve Langasek wrote:
What does gspca have to do with linux-modules-extra-2.6? The current
l-m-e-2.6 build-depends on spca5xx-source, not on gspca-source.
fyi: it is already changed in SVN for some time and was uploaded, but
was removed from NEW due
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
@@ -139,17 +143,16 @@
+ {
+ int f_len = grub_strlen(buf) - grub_strlen(tmp);
+ char *def;
-+ int a;
-+ for(a = 0; a f_len; a++)
-+ grub_memcpy(def
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) Decide that glib can migrate into testing, with the particular change
of checking key values reverted to its pre-2.12.5 behavior, since this
is a destabilizing change in the Debian context.
This looks to be the best option since it preserves
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 17:02 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) Decide that glib can migrate into testing, with the particular change
of checking key values reverted to its pre-2.12.5 behavior, since
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 17:13 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Well, bugs are bugs and I don't think we should be too hard on this. I
think that changes that does change the library behaviour should be
avoided.
The rules for a freeze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
We're waiting rc1 release to migrate to testing but upstream release
the final release and I checked the interdiff between both. It's
basically the version change and one file that was removed.
diff -Nur trac-0.10.3~rc1/ChangeLog
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* bsdmainutils 6.1.5
only the maintainer changed, would be nice to have it up2date in
etch
No
It doesn't make any
Mark Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 09 December 2006 09:59, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Mark Purcell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061209 10:54]:
The discussion on debian-release seems to of died down and there doesn't
appear to be any dissent against uploading.
Stop. We are really
Mark Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 09 December 2006 13:38, Otavio Salvador wrote:
1. Take the library transition of exiv2 forward, or
Would it affect too much packages?
dell:~# apt-cache rdepends libexiv2-0.10
libexiv2-0.10
Reverse Depends:
ufraw
libexiv2-doc
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I sent email to upstream but he didnt answered me.
I believe his not working in this program anymore.
Is it buggy or lack features for you in some way?
Popcon[3] says that this package is very donwloaded, but exist one
package similar tsclient[4].
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I and Robert discussed a lot about it and our final decision is to
remove GRUB2 from Etch. Currently it works very well but it will just
us another upgrade path and it's even unsuitable for production
use. We prefer to keep its development on
Version: 0.85b
Ronny Aasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's not usplash trouble but initramfs problem. What version of your
initramfs-tools package? I sent a patch that were include on last
upload to solve it.
the one in etch 0.85a
i noticed a more recent version in sid. So i have
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are we sure we want 2.6.18 as the kernel for etch? I reported two
bugs, #391929 and #391955, the first of which is readily
reproducible on 2.6.18 only (including ABI -2), meaning I cannot see
the problem with 2.6.17. #391955 is rather sporadic.
I
) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Petter Reinholdtsen ]
* Correct dependency and runlevel info in the init.d script LSB header.
* Make sure init.d script only try to run when discover v1 is installed.
.
[ Otavio Salvador ]
* Change autogen.sh to use automake 1.9 instead of 1.7
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2006-11-04 Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 02:28:42PM +0100, Andreas Metzler [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
icedove has one rc-bug currently (#395095), it contains non-free rfc
documents. However this bug applies to
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:01:22PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
[...]
Adding amd64 as subarch to i386 would mean 3 additional flavors to
build, raising the overall build-time of that package by 1.5-2h.
Which doesn't sound like a blocker to me,
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 01:17:18PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 11:54 +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
I value the importance of the DDTP project, but the translating effort
has only recently seriously started. Looking
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 06:26:27PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
The kernels works to both, dom0 and domU. You use same kernel image.
I think that the only difference is that the domU kernels do not require
any sort of traditional hardware
Jim Crilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 10/01/06 05:08:51PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
Upstream forked a 3.0.3 tree a week ago. I hope they will release it in
the next two weeks. I think it will be a good idea to release this with
Etch. This may be also a good target as RHEL5
Hello,
Please allow discover and discover-data packages to move to
testing. They aren't being use by d-i anymore.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They aren't being use by d-i anymore.
I guess you mean not yet?
Yes and no. Discover 2 was an available option on installer but it's
not used in installer anymore. I plan to migrate to it for installed
system but I lack the time to see it right now.
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes and no. Discover 2 was an available option on installer but it's
not used in installer anymore. I plan to migrate to it for installed
system but I lack the time to see it right now.
discover1 is still used in beta3.
udebs for discover could be
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 15 September 2006 00:04, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I would like to disable init-script too on linux since we're commited
to udeb now but want to drop discover1.
I don't understand this sentence. What do you mean with committed to
udeb?
Using udev
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 15 September 2006 00:43, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Why don't you want to drop discover1? IMO it could be removed as soon
as D-I RC1 is out.
Why not drop it before?
Because it is bad dropping (removing from the archive) a package that is
still
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 08:50:00PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Friday 15 September 2006 00:43, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Why don't you want to drop discover1? IMO it could be removed as soon
as D-I RC1 is out.
Why not drop it before
Brian Braunstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
have the recent installer updates enabled support for common SATA
drives like ubuntu and fedora have done? if not, are these updates
coming soon or just go ahead and install (k)ubuntu or another
distribution with a more functional installer
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Happily, all these packages all depend on libbonobo as well, because
they are also linking to it. One of the reasons for the move is that it
these functions are only needed by applications also using libbonobo.
I was thinking of uploading the new
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As per the recent changes in grub/grub-installer, if grub 0.97-15 enters
testing before grub-installer 1.18 does, this will break d-i (only daily
builds, since etch beta2 images ship their own grub-installer).
Is britney aware of this?
It won't break
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sjoerd Simons) writes:
Apart from that the core library had a soname bump, a deprecated function
has
been removed. Unfortunately the function (dbus_connection_disconnect) is
still used by various applications, so these need a little patching
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:58:20PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:12:43 -0700, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
- grub-installer would have a change to don't use full paths in
kernel-img.conf entries _but_ this one need
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:40:59AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 07:24, Steve Langasek wrote:
So is updating linux-2.6 in testing *before* updating grub-installer
sufficient?
Yes, that is how I understand it from Otavio.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello RM Team,
I would like to remove graveman from testing. I reported a bug to
avoid it to migrate again while it's not in better shape.
See: #383994
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
- -
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 11 August 2006 23:10, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I plan to upload a group of changes to grub and grub-installer to
move update-grub and grub-install to /usr/sbin/.
For this to happen, my transition plan is described bellow:
- A new grub package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear listmasters,
Please block [EMAIL PROTECTED] from posting to the debian-release
mailing list. He appears to be incapable of exercising self-restraint in
using the list for its intended purpose.
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RM team, is ok to me go forward with it?
Why can't you just ship a symlink in the old location?
Yes I can but I want to warn the user so he'll handle the modification
by himself.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RM team, is ok to me go forward with it?
I think the above misses the _why_
The announce only mentions the new, the proposed, location.
I'm happy with the removal of the full paths, but not happy with /usr/sbin
Please allow to grub install
Hello,
I plan to upload a group of changes to grub and grub-installer to
move update-grub and grub-install to /usr/sbin/.
For this to happen, my transition plan is described bellow:
- A new grub package would be uploaded to unstable having a group of
wrappers that will call /usr/sbin
Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you make an announcement to all oot-module maintainers, telling them
that they should put their packages together into linux-modules-extra
(for main) or a similar one for contrib, and if they're not doing it,
they will end up in an unsupported (no
Jason Self [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's important, IMHO, that 2.6.17 _not_ be selected as the default
kernel but rather 2.6.18 (or later) for the reasons discussed on
debian-powerpc... even if that means delaying the release of Etch.
Or backport the fixes to 2.6.17.
--
O T A V I O
Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:19:24PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
I don't see vlan in there, but I uploaded it a week ago, and never
got any ACCEPTED or REJECTED.
Package and upload file at:
Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Some time ago I uploaded directfb 0.9.25.1-1 to experimental. I've
successfully built the following packages, which are the only ones
Build-Depending on libdirectfb-dev:
From my side, this transition is important since it'll fix some
important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Guggenberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So you want a binary nmu? if yes, you should send a mail to
debian-release@lists.debian.org asking for it and it should be done by
the buildd network without much hassle.
I have filed #375158 now,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi RM team,
Please, allow current ltsp package to migrate to testing.
TIA,
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
- -
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One way to mitigate the problem is to propagate a fixed
update-grub script into a Sarge point release; here is a minimal
patch that should make a sarge update-grub script be STDOUT safe.
If the RM people accept I can prepare a package with
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I ment that when you select sarge in choose-mirror in expert mode you
get the inofficial list and if you choose etch/etch+1/sid you get the
official one.
Might be too much work for a transient problem though.
I thought that installing sarge with
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-04 11:24]:
- installer support weak - 2.4 only currently, but this is not enough
if we drop the 2.4 kernels
I think they have switched to 2.6 in the meantime.
- sparc:
- kernel support? we had
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please, could any RM add a hint to get dicover1 in testing updated?
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
- -
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 08:33:38PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
A combination of a working patch in the most current point release,
documentation in the etch release notes and a conflict with the current
package in sarge might however do the trick.
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The debian installer netinst and businesscard images are now broken since
almost a month, and since the d-i team kicked me out as powerpc maintainer,
and removed my d-i commit rights, there is no way for me to help fix this, and
this clearly demostrates
Hello,
Please approve parted packages to migrate to testing. They are ABI
compatible with current testing version and shouldn't cause any issue
AFAIK.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux
Hello,
Please allow discover1{,-data} packages to migrate to testing when the
timeframe ends. Current version has some nice bugfixes.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andrew Donnellan wrote:
It's been a while since the last update: how long to go before r1?
Dunno.
Ryan (ftpmaster) won't give a green light for r1 until the kernel
has been updated.
Kernel of sarge? 2.6.8 and 2.4.27?
IIRC, Debian Kernel Team
Hello,
Please, allow discover1{,-data} to move to testing since d-i beta1
was already release.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 03:50:11PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Would be good to allow discover1 and discover1-data to testing since
it solve some important problems and also update its database with
more entries.
Given that this is likely
401 - 500 of 513 matches
Mail list logo
