Bug#1061179: Bug#1060019: transition: poppler 24.02

2024-05-20 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
sition bug. > > FWIW, I am waiting for a formal "tags -1 confirmed" from Sebastian. Please go ahead Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1067064: transition: petsc hypre

2024-05-15 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
om petsc 3.19. We'd want to > doing this upgrade anyway. Please go ahead. While looking at the tracker, I noticed that petsc is still building manual -dbg packages. IS there a reason that those have not been converted to automatic -dbgsym packages? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1061179: transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-12

2024-05-13 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
; I have skipped Qt 5.15.11 release and would like to upgrade to 5.15.12 > which was published in December. Qt WebEngine will be upgraded from 5.15.15 > to 5.15.16. The transition is prepared in experimental. Let's do this one after poppler migrated. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1071065: transition: libsecp256k1

2024-05-13 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libsecp256k1.html > > Hi, > > I request a transition slot from libsecp256k1-1 to libsecp256k1-2. > The auto-generated tracker is okay. All reverse dependencies in sid build > with the experimental libsecp256k1. Please go ahead Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1067842: transition: octave-9

2024-05-09 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
ransitions. So let's do this one after gnat is done. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1063516: transition: pcl

2024-05-09 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
t; > Hi release team, > > I would like to transition to the new pcl version. The auto generated > ben file looks fine and the reverse build dependency builds fine. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1062761: transition: libfm-qt

2024-05-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
> > libfm-qt has bumped its soversion from 13 to 14, so we need a > transition. > > All affected packages listed in > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libfm-qt.html > are good in experimental. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1062666: transition: openmm

2024-05-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
; (experimental -> unstable) due to soname bump. Current ben tracker [1] > is OK. > > All reverse dependencies rebuild fine, except for cpptraj which is not in > testing. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1070462: transition: evolution-data-server 3.52

2024-05-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
aries had a soname bump. I > believe everything should be binNMUable without issue. Please go ahead Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1070043: transition: wireplumber 0.5

2024-05-05 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
schedule a transition slot for wireplumber 0.5. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1070321: transition: nginx ABI change: nginx-abi-1.24.0-1 -> nginx-abi-1.26.0-1

2024-05-05 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
oad/rebuild solves the problem that arises at time_t 64 > transition: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069997 Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1069919: transition: kimageannotator

2024-05-05 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
elease.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-kcolorpicker.html Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1055755: transition: libre/rem/baresip

2024-05-05 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2024-04-12 21:29:09 +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 22:34:49 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher > wrote: > > Did you coordinate this plan with the maintainer of libre? > > I am now part of the main

Bug#1069700: transition: rpm

2024-05-05 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
> > Dear Release Team, > > A new RPM version is available and has been uploaded and accepted in > experimental as version 4.19.1.1+dfsg-1~exp, and it introduces an ABI > bump from soname version 9 to 10 for the library packages shipped from > src:rpm. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1063770: transition: mupdf

2024-05-05 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
eem to use mupdf at all > pymupdf - requires some changes. Likely also needs to update to new upstream > version. > sioyek - requires some changes to drop extra linker flags. Have bugs been filed for these issues? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1061267: transition: unixcw

2024-05-05 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
> Dear Release Team, > > I am requesting a transition for unixcw [1]. The one reverse > dependency, cwdaemon, builds correctly against the package in > experimental. The auto-transition page is [2]. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1064810: transition: mpi-defaults

2024-05-05 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
the next britney run. After that we can look into starting the transition to change mpi-defaults on 32 bit architctures. That is currently https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/mpi-defaults.html This will also require changes to hdf5. Have they been prepared somewhere? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1061515: transition: ace

2024-05-04 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
> > Hi, > > Small transition with only two affected packages: diagnostics, ivtools, > Both of them builds fine with ace 7.1.3+dfsg-1 in experimental. > > The autogenerated ben tracker looks good. Please consider 'ace' for > transition. > Thanks in advance. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1070121: nmu: coreutils_9.4-3 (trixie), pam_1.5.2-9.1 (trixie)

2024-04-30 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
be ready to migrate to trixie, but migrating them makes britney crash. I don't expect that to change when we rebuild the packages in trixie. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Re: Making trixie debootstrap-able again?

2024-04-26 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
s in an existing, devel-oriented, unclean > trixie chroot). I am currently looking into making coreutils and systemd (which needs glib2.0) migrate. I hope to have it back in a debootstrapable-step after the weekend. If you are aware of more apckages that need help, please let us know. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Re: Status of the t64 transition

2024-04-24 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
of autopkgtests [1] and report or fix any issues related to failing tests. * Check if source-only uploads for Arch: all packages are missing. Cheers [1] Note that wecurrently ignore autopkgtest results on armel and armhf. -- Sebastian Ramacher

Re: Status of the t64 transition

2024-04-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Andreas, please stop reopening the time_t bugs where transitions are staged in experimental. When we eventually start those transitions, they do not need to change the package name again as they will enter unstable with a new SONAME and built with the 64 bit time_t ABI. Cheers -- Sebastian

Bug#1056574: transition: ppp

2024-04-20 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
gt; In the mean time, #1065940 has become a blocker for the time_t transition. I > think I'd rather upload 2.5.0 and break network-manager-fortisslvpn than > just the patch to fix the breakage. > > Would the release team be happy to continue with this transition? Please go ahead with the upload to unsable. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Re: Status of the t64 transition

2024-04-19 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
gt; vg > > This package is in a bad state in any case and we are aware of this. > However, could you explain in how far is this affecting t64 transition > since 32bit architectures are excluded? As said in my initial mail, I didn't exclude packages that are not part of testing. Patches welcome. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Re: Status of the t64 transition

2024-04-19 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2024-04-19 06:02:03 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2024-04-18 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > [...] > > Let's start with the first category. Those are packages that could be > > binNMUed, but there are issues that make those rebuilds not have the > > desired effect. Th

Status of the t64 transition

2024-04-18 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
it to testing. The dd-list of the packages above is attached. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher A Mennucc1 dvbstreamer Adam Borowski kbtin termrec Adrian Knoth qstopmotion (U) Agathe Porte ortools (U) Alastair McKinstry cctools ggcov mathgl (U) ncl pyferret python

Bug#1068961: llvm-toolchain-18: block migration to testing: to many llvm-toolchain versions in testing

2024-04-14 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
old versions from the archive, I propose to not let any new versions of llvm-toolchain-X migrate to trixie until the number of versions is reduced to a maintainable number. Please do not downgrade or close this bug report before contacting the release team. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1068366: nmu: gyoto_2.0.2-1.1

2024-04-05 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
ta. Otherwise it will need an upload anyway. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1064810: Bug#1067055: openmpi: error: implicit declaration of function 'OPAL_THREAD_ADD_FETCH64'

2024-04-02 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2024-04-02 07:13:38 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > > On 01/04/2024 23:25, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > There is a transition to openmpi-5 / mpi-defaults which is stalled by the > > > t64 transition. > > > > > > It drops 32-bit support from Open

Bug#1067953: transition: flint

2024-04-02 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
ymake > * singular Please perform test builds or track the rebuilds for build failures. Cheers > > Ben file: > > title = "flint"; > is_affected = (.build-depends ~ /\blibflint-dev\b/) | (.depends ~ > /\blibflint(?:18|18t64|19)\b/); > is_good = .depends ~ /\blibflint19\b/; > is_bad = .depends ~ /\blibflint18(?:t64)?\b/; > > Thank you! -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1064810: Bug#1067055: openmpi: error: implicit declaration of function 'OPAL_THREAD_ADD_FETCH64'

2024-04-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
that, I'd prefer to not do this transition now. Unfortunately, uploads such as the one of pmix that no dropped support for 32 bit architectures (#1068211) are not really helpful. Also, #1064810 has no information on test builds with the new mpi-defaults on a 32 bit architecture. So has this transition been tested? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1059535: transition: abseil

2024-04-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2024-04-01 10:39:08 -0400, Benjamin Barenblat wrote: > On Monday, April 1, 2024, at 2:57 PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Could you please re-add the build dependency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) to > > ensure that the build with the new armel/armhf ABI only migrates w

Bug#1059535: transition: abseil

2024-04-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2024-03-29 17:27:58 -0400, Benjamin Barenblat wrote: > On Friday, March 29, 2024, at 1:02 PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Since the version in unstable fails to build on armel and armhf and > > blocks the time_t transition, but the version in experimental builds >

Bug#1059535: transition: abseil

2024-03-29 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Benjamin On 2024-02-14 21:01:40 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2024-02-14 14:48:49 -0500, Benjamin Barenblat wrote: > > I’d like to alter this transition request. Instead of transitioning to > > version 20230802, I’d like to transition to v

Bug#1067943: nmu: qtbase-opensource-src_5.15.10+dfsg-7

2024-03-29 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: reopen -1 On 2024-03-29 12:15:11 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2024-03-29 11:17:25 +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: qtbase-opensource-...@packages.debian.org > > Control: affects -1

Bug#1036884: more trackers

2024-03-29 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
a script to schedule all remaining binNMUs. We then hopefully only have to sort out the remaining FTBFS issues, hardcoded dependencies and Architecture: all binaries. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Re: Should I upload 0ad involved in wxwidgets3.2 migration?

2024-03-27 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
e rebuild failed because the FTBFS fix is not yet in unstable. > > Should I upload a new version of 0ad to help the wxwidgets3.2 migration? Yes, please. The upload is necessary to rebuild 0ad for these transitions. Cheers > Should I wait for 0ad to be removed from testing (planned in 5 days)? > > Please Cc: me on reply. > > Thanks > > -- > Dr. Ludovic Rousseau > -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1036884: libgpgme11t64 binNMUs

2024-03-27 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2024-03-26 20:30:12 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > The next good target for binNMUs that wasn't done yet (AFAICS) is > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gpgme1.0.html Scheduled Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t -> sphinxbase

2024-03-27 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
way towards it), and ffmpeg is > involved in a bunch of other sub-transitions. Scheduled, thanks. > (I hope this is an OK format to make suggestions in?) Yes, it is. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1051237: transition: move files from / to /usr to finalize /usr-merge

2024-03-09 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
ges where transition has to be coordinated to the ongoing mega transition does not help. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: libuuid1t64 -> libuuid1

2024-03-04 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
; pacemaker > parted > rasqal > reiserfsprogs > scitokens-cpp > seafile > tpm2-tss > xen > xplc > xrootd Scheduled Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: libpam0g -> libpam0t64 -> libpam0g

2024-03-02 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
ync. Scheduled. We'll need to do some MA: same version skew clean up after the transition is done, though. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t

2024-03-02 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
op). There was already an upload by the maintainer correcting the issue. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t

2024-03-02 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
d everywhere since it builds MA: same binaries. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t

2024-02-29 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
uilt with dpkg-dev (>= 1.5.22), gcc-13 (>= 13.2.0-16.1), > and libgnutls28-dev (>= 3.8.3-1.1). Scheduled. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1059535: transition: abseil

2024-02-14 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
ished the time_t transition. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1061476: Transition slot for elpi

2024-02-09 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
tion. Normal operation will continue after the time_t transition. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1061645: poco: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-06 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
tly after time_t is done. Please do not entangle them. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1060103: transition: imagemagick7

2024-02-02 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
n is done, we will not process other transitions. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1061774: nmu: pngcheck_3.0.3-1

2024-01-29 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
an. Minimum requirements are expressed via dependencies and if zlib's ABI breaks it has to change its SONAME. Reassinging to fitspng. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1061071: transition: libcamera 0.2.0

2024-01-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
> > Please schedule a transition slot for libcamera 0.2.0. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1061061: transition: astc-encoder

2024-01-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
+ src:astc-encoder > > > Dear release team, > > I'd like to transition astc-encoder after a SONAME bump. There is only > one reverse dependency (filament), which builds fine against the new > version. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1060704: transition: dcmtk

2024-01-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
SONAME transition. Are the reverse dependencies known to build with the new dcmtk version? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1060188: transition: flatbuffers

2024-01-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
c:flatbuffers: > build-rdeps package Should those that are not part of the transition tracker use the shared library or not? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1060182: transition: simdjson

2024-01-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
> Hi, > > simdjson upstream bumped SOVERSION from 16 to 19 in the latest release. > All reverse dependencies can be rebuilt against 19 on amd64. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1060058: transition: tpm2-tss

2024-01-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
n.org > Control: affects -1 + src:tpm2-tss > > The upstream changes the API/ABI. So we need a transition. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1059066: transition: nauty

2024-01-16 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2024-01-16 11:16:17 +, Torrance, Douglas wrote: > On Mon 15 Jan 2024 10:20:44 PM +01, Sebastian Ramacher > wrote: > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > On 2023-12-19 23:02:13 +, Torrance, Douglas wrote: > > > Package: release.debi

Bug#1059272: transition: tango

2024-01-15 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Santiago On 2023-12-27 21:16:02 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2023-12-22 08:36:17 -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: tran

Bug#1060077: transition: g2clib

2024-01-15 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
ontrol: affects -1 + src:g2clib > > > There is a minor transition I wish to proceed. g2clib upstream have added an > SOVERSION of .0 Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1059066: transition: nauty

2024-01-15 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
equesting a transition slot for nauty. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1028489: boost1.83 as default

2024-01-14 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Anton On 2023-12-18 07:20:28 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > uploded. boost-defaults migrated to testing. The remaining issues are: ceph: #1056793, #1056085, #1058543 graph-tool: #1060786 i2pd: #1060787 pycuda: #1060788 Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1055955: transition: perl 5.38

2024-01-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
you're OK with the > > above testing removals. Please let me know when a suitable transition > > slot becomes available. > > Hi, gentle ping on this? Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
ge of the binary package name. > g2clib Can be combined with the upcoming transition (see #1060077). Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1059597: transition: papi

2023-12-29 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
gt; Only starpu needs a binNMU (builds fine locally). > I'll upload a binNMU of starpu-contrib myself since it cannot be > autobuilt due to the non-free nvidia-cuda-tookit build-dependency. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1059272: transition: tango

2023-12-27 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
t of uploads are needed to fix the pytango FTBFS bugs in unstable > related to python3.12: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055733 > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1049843 > > Even if there is only one reverse dependency, I prefer to ask:

Bug#1059330: transition: shapelib

2023-12-27 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
shapelib > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-shapelib.html > > Shapelib 1.6.0 bumps the SONAME requiring a transition. > > All rdeps built successfully with the new version as summarized below. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1059358: transition: wolfssl

2023-12-27 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
: normal > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-wolfssl.html > > wolfssl is available in experimental with libwolfssl42. > This transition is from libwolfssl41. > The auto-generated Ben file is okay and all reverse dependencies build fine. Pl

Bug#1059026: transition: rocksdb

2023-12-20 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Small transition of RocksDB to the 8.9.1 release, available from > experimental. Affected packages are balboa, oxigraph and sortmerna. > While oxigraph is Sid only currently, all three build fine with this > version of RocksDB as well. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1058944: transition: petsc

2023-12-20 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
etsc > > I'd like to upgrade PETSc (and SLEPc, and their python packages) > from 3.18 to 3.19. This is expected to fix the python 3.12 build > error in slepc4py, Bug#1057863. dolfin has now been patched to work > with petsc 3.19. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1057706: transition: dpdk

2023-12-20 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Luca On 2023-12-19 09:12:12 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Please binnmu src:collectd as well, when you have a moment - there's a > runtime recommends instead of a depends, so it won't appear on the > automated tracker. Thanks! Scheduled Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1028489: boost1.83 as default

2023-12-17 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 = confirmed Hi Anton On 2023-11-16 23:08:10 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > bugs are filed: > > https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=ftbfs-boost183-transition=gl...@debian.org=1=1=1=1#results Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1057706: transition: dpdk

2023-12-16 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Luca On 2023-12-07 11:41:04 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > We have prepared the src:dpdk 23.11 ABI transition. Please go ahead Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1058781: transition: zxing-cpp

2023-12-16 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2023-12-15 23:00:43 -0500, Boyuan Yang wrote: > I am looking to upload zxing-cpp 2.x (currently 2.2.1-1~exp1) to Debian Sid. A > library SONAME bump is needed in this transition (libzxing2 -> libzxing3). Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1058742: transition: libcotp

2023-12-16 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
date libcotp in unstable to the 3.0.0-1. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Re: g2clib transition

2023-12-16 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
eed rebuilding: pygrib, ncl and grads. > > I also maintain these 3 packages and they trivially rebuild. So this can be > done in a day, without impacting other transitions. > > May I proceed? Please turn this into a transition bug. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-12-11 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2023-12-11 16:57:34 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Am Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 01:36:38PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > > > OK, but what is your suggestion? Reverting and have broken tests due to > > > the pandoc issue? > > > > pandoc is fixed in unstabl

Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-12-11 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2023-12-11 13:28:59 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > Am Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:29:24AM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > > > > I found a workaround; demote pandoc from a Depends to a Recommends in > > > > the r-cran-rmarkdown package.

Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-12-11 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
ied and uploaded. This change broke autopkgtests of reverse dependencies. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-12-05 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
rm such reorganizations in experimental first and then upload in one go to unstable. pandoc is now impacting at least two transitions. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1057304: nmu: ros2-performance-test-fixture_0.2.0-1

2023-12-03 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
aintainers. > A binNMU seems to be the simplest fix for that. That would just hide a serious bug in benchmark. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1053800: transition: libgit2

2023-12-02 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2023-12-02 14:28:42 +0100, Timo Röhling wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > * Sebastian Ramacher [2023-12-01 22:17]: > > Hoping that there are some good news regarding the bindings. What's the > > current status? > > 50% progress :) Then let's

Bug#1053800: transition: libgit2

2023-12-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Timo On 2023-11-04 21:34:29 +0100, Timo Röhling wrote: > * Sebastian Ramacher [2023-11-01 12:14]: > > There are no replies on the bug report. Are there any news regarding the > > rust bindings? > No, nothing yet. All uploads in the past two years came from Peter Michael >

Bug#1057175: transition: libsfml

2023-12-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
ty: normal > > Hi, > > libsfml needs a transition due to an ABI bump from 2.5 to 2.6. It's > currently in experimental and built everywhere except mips64el where > it's waiting to be built. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1055857: transition: opm-common

2023-11-23 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
bad = .depends ~ "libopm-common-2023.04"; libopm-common has a Provides: libopm-common-X, but the shared library included in libopm-common also has a SONAME of libopm-common.X. Why is the packaging not following the common practice of matching the package name with the SONAME? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1056308: transition: wireshark

2023-11-23 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
xpected Fail: 0 > Fail: 1 > Unexpected Pass:0 > Skipped:1 > Timeout:0 > ... > > I believe libvirt will build fine with the updated wireshark package on the > buildds. > > Thank you, > Balint > > [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-wireshark.html -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1056204: nmu: texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7

2023-11-19 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
ion or created a version > statement in the depends line like "Depends: ... zlib1g (>= 1:1.3)", hence > I'd add an artificial "Breaks: ... zlib1g (<= 1:1.2.3)" to my > texlive-binaries package to make sure 1.3 is in place, when the new > texlive-binaries comes in. Correct? No, that's certainly the incorrect fix. Especially if that is hard-coded. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1056065: transition: spdlog

2023-11-18 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Andrius binNMUs for the reverse dependencies have been scheduled. spdlog's autopkgtest fail, though: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/s/spdlog/39983394/log.gz Could you please take a look? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1055891: transition: gdal

2023-11-16 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html > Control: block -1 by 1051433 > > For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 3.8.0. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1055600: transition: suitesparse-7.3

2023-11-16 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
t that there won’t be any > issue. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1056065: transition: spdlog

2023-11-16 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
good = .depends ~ /\b(libspdlog\-dev|libspdlog1\.12)\b/; > is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(libspdlog1\.10)\b/; I suspect that's due to the use of libspdlogX-fmtY. I've added a manual tracker and added the fmt postfix. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1055812: nmu: sqlcipher_4.5.5-3

2023-11-11 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
uot; > > The SONAME of the shared library changed from libsqlcipher0 to libsqlcipher1. > This is related to > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-sqlcipher.html >. In this case, please select transition in reportbug to get the correct meta data. Fixing. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-11-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
the archive, do not affect this transition. Can you please clarify whether you are talking about new dependencies or reverse dependencies above? Thanks. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1055755: transition: libre/rem/baresip

2023-11-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
les of auto-libre and auto-rem are okay and > the packages build fine but are relying on being updated together (the > experimental baresip does not build with unstable libre/rem, while > experimental libre/rem break baresip). Did you coordinate this plan with the maintainer of libre? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1055699: transition: spglib

2023-11-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
; (experimental -> unstable) due to soname bump. Current ben tracker [1] > is OK. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1055751: transition: wolfssl

2023-11-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 = confirmed On 2023-11-10 19:13:22 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote: > Am 10.11.23 um 18:03 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > On 2023-11-10 15:57:27 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote: > > > The auto-generated Ben file is oka

Bug#1055751: transition: wolfssl

2023-11-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
atus of the reverse dependencies? Do they build successfully with the new version of wolfssl? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1055194: transition: openturns

2023-11-09 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
> > Dear Release Team, > > I would like to request a transition slot for openturns. It has been accepted > to experimental after a SONAME bump as some symbols changed in a not > backward-compatible way. It builds correctly. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1055487: nmu: openstructure_2.6.0~rc-1~exp spglib_2.1.0-1~exp

2023-11-09 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
ckages recently accepted to > experimental. > >   nmu openstructure_2.6.0~rc-1~exp . amd64 . experimental . -m "Rebuild on > buildd" > nmu spglib_2.1.0-1~exp . amd64 . experimental . -m "Rebuild on buildd" We can of course schedule the binNMUs, but I am wondering why are those required? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-11-07 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2023-11-07 14:38:13 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > Am Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 10:53:00AM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > I admit I'm not really happy about the bug ping-pong. > > > > I just finished inspe

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-11-07 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
bout new dependencies of packages currently in the archive. So what's the status of new the dependencies? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >