patch: debian/patches/fix-CVE-2016-10165.patch.
+Fix for CVE-2016-10165. (Closes: #852627)
+Thanks to Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org>
+
+ -- Thomas Weber <twe...@debian.org> Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:04:13 +0100
+
lcms2 (2.8-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* New patch: lcms2-f
2014-03-17 23:41:12.0
+0100
+++ lcms2-2.2+git20110628/debian/changelog 2014-03-21 11:29:26.0
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+lcms2 (2.2+git20110628-2.2+deb7u1) stable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Fix security bugs in stable (Closes: #714529), CVE-2013-4160
+
+ -- Thomas Weber twe
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 04:24:24PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 = wheezy confirmed
Control: retitle -1 wheezy-pu: package lcms2/2.2+git20110628-2.2+deb7u1
On 2014-03-21 12:21, Thomas Weber wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: squeeze
I don't think
should fix the bug with the test suite as well.
+(Closes: #664776)
+
+ -- Thomas Weber twe...@debian.org Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:19:39 +0200
+
octave-java (1.2.8-5) unstable; urgency=low
* restore-locale.patch: new patch, restores locale after initializing the JVM
diff -Nru octave-java-1.2.8
Hi,
in order to fix #598227 (http://bugs.debian.org/598227), I would like to
upload octave with the attached patch (it adds /usr/include/mpi to the
include path used by mkoctfile, the script used for generating 'addons'
for Octave). It shouldn't have any influence on other packages.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package octave3.2
Discussion happened at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/08/msg01690.html
Thanks
Thomas
unblock octave3.2/3.2.4-7
-- System
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Severity: normal
Please unblock package octave-nan
It contains only a small patch (see below). The bug is considered
critical by upstream, see
http://bugs.debian.org/594906
There are some other
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Severity: normal
Please unblock package octave-nan
It contains only a small patch (see below). The bug is considered
critical by upstream, see
http://bugs.debian.org/594906
There are some other
.
They are already pulled in by other packages, so we don't need to force
specific versions of Mesa (closes: #591333).
The patch is a two line change extracted from upstream's development
tree.
Thanks
Thomas
From: Thomas Weber twe...@debian.org
Subject: Don't crash on calling addpath
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package dynare,
it contains only debconf translation updates. Changelog below:
dynare (4.1.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/po/da.po: new Danish debconf
Hi,
sorry, I'm swamped in other work, so I didn't act earlier on this.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:32:23PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 06:24:40 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 23:04 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
I want to get rid
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
it seems arpack was built in an unclean chroot and now forces the
installation of libatlas3gf-base on amd64; in contrast on i386:
libblas3gf | libblas.so.3gf | libatlas3gf-base
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:49:54PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
Hi,
please schedule the following binNMUS:
nmu octave-ad . ALL . -m Rebuild with octave-pkg-dev 0.7.3
nmu octave-ann . ALL . -m Rebuild with octave-pkg-dev 0.7.3
nmu octave-audio . ALL . -m Rebuild with octave-pkg-dev 0.7.3
Hi,
please schedule the following binNMUS:
nmu octave-ad . ALL . -m Rebuild with octave-pkg-dev 0.7.3
nmu octave-ann . ALL . -m Rebuild with octave-pkg-dev 0.7.3
nmu octave-audio . ALL . -m Rebuild with octave-pkg-dev 0.7.3
nmu octave-combinatorics . ALL . -m Rebuild with octave-pkg-dev 0.7.3
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 06:00:04PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le samedi 20 mars 2010 à 13:49 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit :
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org writes:
I am planning to upload some modifications in the way Linear Algebra
Libraries BLAS / LAPACK and ATLAS are
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
I want to get rid of octave3.0 for Squeeze. Please hint it out of
testing.
Thanks
Thomas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:39:32PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Thomas Weber thomas.weber.m...@gmail.com writes:
please schedule the following binNMUS:
Done.
Thanks.
Now, two more
nmu octave-communications . ALL . -m Rebuild against hdf5
dw octave-communications . ALL . -m octave
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
Just a gently polling.
Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python
Hi,
please schedule the following binNMUS:
nmu dynare . alpha amd64 armel hppa i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc -m Rebuild against hdf5
nmu octave-ad . alpha amd64 armel hppa i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc -m Rebuild
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
Just a gently polling.
Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python transition has
major priority...
- Forwarded message from Francesco P. Lovergine fran...@debian.org
-
Date: Mon, 25 Jan
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:40:01PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
hint mono/2.4+dfsg-6 mod-mono/2.4.2-1 xsp/2.4.2-1 mono-tools/2.4.2-1
mono was now (force-)hinted in by Phil (needed also gtk-sharp2 ftr), so
can we force suitesparse/openmpi in, please?
Could
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:41:42AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:49:34PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
The octave3.2 package failed to autobuild on ia64 and is stuck on
powerpc.
the armel experimental buildd is again having hangings like #524745
in octave3.2
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 09:46:59AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:03:04AM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:41:42AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
the armel experimental buildd is again having hangings like #524745
in octave3.2 postinst. Seen so far
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 07:10:41PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:26:43PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:04:24PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:53:19PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
correct. It might have something to do
Hi,
thanks for already unblocking octave3.0/1:3.0.1-6lenny2
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Am Montag, den 02.02.2009, 23:14 +0100 schrieb Thomas Weber:
Short status update: Aurelien gave me access to an ARM machine, so I can
try to get this fixed.
Okay, I see Luk has already
unblock octave-symbolic/1.0.6-3
Thanks
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release
Short status update: Aurelien gave me access to an ARM machine, so I can
try to get this fixed.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:18:19PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]:
I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be only a one-line change.
Sadly, the package now FTBFS on ARM only
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:59:35PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Thomas Weber [Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:27:59 +0100]:
Hi,
#512075 was fixed by upstream in a new release. The diff between those
two releases is in the bug report,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=30;filename
Hi,
#512075 was fixed by upstream in a new release. The diff between those
two releases is in the bug report,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=30;filename=1.0.6-1.0.7.diff.bz2;att=1;bug=512075
There are only two actual changes in there, the biggest part of the diff
is the newly
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:27:38PM +0100, Christoph Martin wrote:
The kernel build succeded after 71 hours.
[snip]
What do I have to do to establish and configure it as a buildd host?
=20
How about being a little bit sensible? a C100 will *never* be suitable
as a buildd host. Your offer
Am Montag, den 13.10.2008, 09:34 +0200 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
Ah, and please mail again when it's uploaded.
Built on all architectures,
unblock octave-audio/1.1.1-2
Thanks
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496964
The bug renders sound.m unusable, meaning a user can't use this to play
sound (the bug stems from a change to get it working on Mac).
Attached is the proposed patch (yes, only one line removed).
Thomas
Don't set the play
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 05:15:05PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Thomas Weber [Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:55:40 +0200]:
please unbock octave-vrml, currently in unstable. Changelog and Patch
quoted/attached.
Unblocked by Luk.
Thanks
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
(no changes
needed)
[ Thomas Weber ]
* New patch: whitedune_for_freewrl: use whitedune instead of freewrl, the
later is not packaged in Debian (closes: 499918)
* debian/control: Add necessary dependencies for whitedune and dependencies
used in the demos.
-- Thomas Weber [EMAIL
to 3.8.0 (no changes
needed)
* added myself to the uploaders list.
[ Thomas Weber ]
* New patch: patches/no-nan-values
Error out in case of NaN values, they are not
supported by VTK (closes: 480431)
I didn't remove the standards bump
Am Sonntag, den 24.08.2008, 18:58 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
Thomas Weber wrote:
Hi,
octave-ga's upstream notified us that the current version in Lenny is in
a bad shape and whether we could update it to current SVN, see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495489
Am Montag, den 18.08.2008, 11:14 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
Hi,
octave-ga's upstream notified us that the current version in Lenny is in
a bad shape and whether we could update it to current SVN, see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495489
Now, before you tar
Hi,
octave-ga's upstream notified us that the current version in Lenny is in
a bad shape and whether we could update it to current SVN, see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495489
Now, before you tar and feather me: upstream uses Lenny himself and has
tested this version on
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 09:28:40PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Thomas Weber [Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:34:43 +0200]:
Given that octave3.0 has the same version in testing and unstable, why
would you want to upload to t-p-u and not unstable? (that is, you should
upload to unstable unless you have
Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 21:28 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
* Thomas Weber [Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:34:43 +0200]:
[resending, it seems
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494139#20
didn't make it to the list]
(It did arrive.)
Hmm, sorry for the noise then, but I still can't
Am Dienstag, den 12.08.2008, 11:10 -0300 schrieb Steve Langasek:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:13:33AM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
the atlas package was uploaded:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/atlas.html
which fixes this RC (ftbfs) bug:
[resending, it seems
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494139#20
didn't make it to the list]
Am Donnerstag, den 07.08.2008, 19:52 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
Thomas Weber wrote:
Hi,
would fixing #494139 (quoted below) qualify for a freeze exception?
Yes
Do you prefer
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 07:52:15PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Thomas Weber wrote:
Hi,
would fixing #494139 (quoted below) qualify for a freeze exception?
Yes
Do you prefer an upload to unstable or testing-proposed-updates? Octave
has lot's of build-dependencies.
Thomas
Hi,
would fixing #494139 (quoted below) qualify for a freeze exception?
Am Donnerstag, den 07.08.2008, 14:57 +0200 schrieb Alexander Achenbach:
Package: octave3.0-headers
Version: 1:3.0.1-6
Tags: lenny
This package should allow package libhdf5-openmpi-dev to satisfy
the HDF5 MPI
Hi,
please give back qtoctave on alpha, with a dep-wait on cmake (=2.6)
gb qtoctave . alpha
Thanks
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
the build chroot on mips buildd ball seems broken[1]. So, please give
back the following packages on mips in the hope that they are tried on a
different buildd:
octave-gsl
octave-octgpr
octave-linear-algebra
octave-image
qtoctave
shogun
If you
Hi,
please give back octaviz on the following architectures:
unconditionally:
alpha i386 mips mipsel powerpc sparc
with dep-wait on octave3.0 (1:3.0.0-10):
s390 hppa
In case it matters: these were binNMUs for the hdf-transition.
Thanks
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 20/03/08 09:19 +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
Hi,
please see
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=shogunarch=armver=0.5.1-1stamp=1205965767file=logas=raw:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 May 23 2007 /etc/alternatives/octave-config
- /usr/bin/octave-config-2.1.71
That is fully broken.
Hi,
octplot's latest build failed on
powerpc
ia64
due to a change in libfltk1.1. This has since been fixed in fltk1.1
(1.1.8~rc2-2).
Can you give ocplot back on powerpc and ia64?
Thanks
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On 19/03/08 13:11 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The suitesparse transition is involving a quite large number of packages. I
prepared an igloo URL [1] with the ones I think are involved. Please,
correct me if I am wrong. The mips arch
On 10/03/08 21:41 +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
One more (missed due to being in contrib)
octave-gpc_0.1.6-4, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, alpha arm i386 ia64 m68k
mips powerpc s390
NACK by maintainers, we'll do a sourceful upload.
Riku, thanks for catching this.
Thomas
--
To
Hi,
octave2.9 was built in an outdated chroot for i386, resulting in a
broken libcurl dependency. Is a binNMU sufficient to fix this?
octave2.9_1:2.9.13-1, Rebuild against current libcurl on i386, 1, i386
Thanks
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Am Samstag, den 30.06.2007, 15:49 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 05:51:32PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Looking at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=octave2.9ver=1%3A2.9.12-1arch=sparcstamp=1180158407file=log
it seems that octave2.9 1:2.9.12-1 build
Hi,
octaviz failed in April with an ICE on arm. Can you give it back such that it
is tried again?
octaviz_0.4.5-5
Thanks
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and libglpk0 to 4.15, to avoid
problems with the new glpk 4.15 package now in experimental.
-- Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:47:51 +0100
octave2.9-forge (2006.07.09+dfsg1-8) unstable; urgency=low
[ Thomas Weber ]
* debian/control: Bump Octave2.9's version to = 2.9.9
Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 19:52 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
Thomas Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
please
unblock octave2.9/2.9.9-8etch1
unblock octave2.9-forge/2006.07.09+dfsg1-8
Now with working unit tests.
Unblocked.
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Am Mittwoch, den 21.02.2007, 16:19 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 06:52:02PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
with the fix for #410070 in octave2.9-2.9.9-8, an FTBFS error in
octave2.9-forge was found (#410463). This turned out to be an error in
the way the unit tests
Hi,
with the fix for #410070 in octave2.9-2.9.9-8, an FTBFS error in
octave2.9-forge was found (#410463). This turned out to be an error in
the way the unit tests for octave2.9-forge are created at build time.
Unfortunately, in fixing this bug in octave2.9-forge, we hit another bug
in Octave2.9
Hi,
the latest version of octaviz can't enter testing because it ftbfs on
arm, ia64 and sparc.
The failure is due to a chroot corruption on the buildds, probably
caused by an earlier upload of a related package last year, see [1].
Summary: There's a broken alternatives symlink set in the
Hi,
is it possible that the references were mixed up in the previous mail? I
think [1] and [3] should be switched.
All packages which we currently consider for R2 are listed at [1].
sudo: proposed fix exists at [2],
See [3] for a list of packages still missing in s-p-u but availible
via
Hi
Steve, you probably should create a little transitions FAQ entry
in the developers reference to not always have to answer to the same
wrong proposals of developers who only do a transition once every couple
of years :)
I fail to see what's so wrong about an (automated) email stating that
62 matches
Mail list logo
