On 2022-04-27 15:18:16 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 07:30:56PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 = confirmed
> > Control: forwarded -1
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-icu.html
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > On 2022-04-13 17:24:20 +0200, László
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 07:30:56PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 = confirmed
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-icu.html
>
> Hi
>
> On 2022-04-13 17:24:20 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 2:36 PM Jeremy Bic
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 7:30 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 = confirmed
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-icu.html
>
> On 2022-04-13 17:24:20 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 = confirmed
Bug #1007905 [release.debian.org] transition: icu
Added tag(s) confirmed; removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-icu.html
Bug #1007905 [release.debian.org] transition: icu
Ignoring request to chang
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-icu.html
Hi
On 2022-04-13 17:24:20 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 2:36 PM Jeremy Bicha
> wrote:
> > mozjs78 and mozjs91 now no longer have an ICU dependency in Unstabl
Hi,
Am 15.04.22 um 08:57 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS):
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 8:48 AM Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am 13.04.22 um 17:52 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS):
LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for
the Lao
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 8:48 AM Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Am 13.04.22 um 17:52 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> > Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS):
> >> LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for
> >> the Lao language.
> >
> > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/li
Hi again,
Am 13.04.22 um 17:52 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS):
LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for
the Lao language.
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=263961306ede0656ebb7904034a2172615ce8
Hi,
Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS):
LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for
the Lao language.
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=263961306ede0656ebb7904034a2172615ce81d0
We could backport the needed stuff to 7.3.
Ot
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 2:36 PM Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> mozjs78 and mozjs91 now no longer have an ICU dependency in Unstable.
>
> 0ad was fixed also.
Thanks. Did the rebuild locally on i386 and amd64; started with the
ICU 71.1 RC release and finished with the final release if that
matters. Only use
mozjs78 and mozjs91 now no longer have an ICU dependency in Unstable.
0ad was fixed also.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:53 AM Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 06:50:34 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > As noted, mozjs78 and 0ad FTBFS in my pbuilder setups.
>
> That's interesting, 0ad built fine for me against 70.1 on a porterbox
> (i386 on barriere) - and its vendored cop
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 at 09:28:49 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 06:05:38PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Obviously all these copies of essentially the same codebase are quite
> > unfortunate, but mozjs and ICU seem to be sufficiently tightly-coupled
> > that perhaps using its
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 8:28 AM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 06:05:38PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Obviously all these copies of essentially the same codebase are quite
> > unfortunate, but mozjs and ICU seem to be sufficiently tightly-coupled
> > that perhaps using its vendo
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 06:05:38PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 17:38:43 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>...
> Obviously all these copies of essentially the same codebase are quite
> unfortunate, but mozjs and ICU seem to be sufficiently tightly-coupled
> that perha
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 12:47:50AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 17:38:43 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> > At this point I remember only two packages that FTBFS
> > with ICU 70.1 and I couldn't fix those. One is mozjs78 and the other
> > is 0ad.
>
> mozjs78 has un
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 17:38:43 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> At this point I remember only two packages that FTBFS
> with ICU 70.1 and I couldn't fix those. One is mozjs78 and the other
> is 0ad.
mozjs78 has unit tests that assume the vendored ICU will be used. I'm
trying to adapt them
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 17:38:43 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> At this point I remember only two packages that FTBFS
> with ICU 70.1 and I couldn't fix those. One is mozjs78 and the other
> is 0ad.
I think Ubuntu has already done this transition, so they might have
patches.
0ad bundles
Le ven. 18 mars 2022 à 18:26, László Böszörményi (GCS) a
écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 5:38 PM László Böszörményi (GCS)
> wrote:
> > I didn't file those bugs, but started patching those and filed only
> > when succeeded. At this point I remember only two packages that FTBFS
> > with ICU 70.
On 18.03.22 17:38, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
Hi all,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 1:42 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2022-03-18 13:06:13, Jérémy Lal wrote:
FYI same here, i had to fallback to nodejs 14 instead of 16 because of that.
Last time I asked, icu maintainer had issues fixing icu r
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 5:38 PM László Böszörményi (GCS)
wrote:
> I didn't file those bugs, but started patching those and filed only
> when succeeded. At this point I remember only two packages that FTBFS
> with ICU 70.1 and I couldn't fix those. One is mozjs78 and the other
> is 0ad. I had tro
Hi all,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 1:42 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2022-03-18 13:06:13, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > FYI same here, i had to fallback to nodejs 14 instead of 16 because of that.
> > Last time I asked, icu maintainer had issues fixing icu reverse
> > build-dependencies.
> > He probabl
On 2022-03-18 13:06:13, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 12:51 PM Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org, i...@packages.de
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 12:51 PM Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org, i...@packages.debian.org
> Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transit
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org, i...@packages.debian.org
Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-icu.html
Tags: moreinfo
icu has a new upstream versio
25 matches
Mail list logo