On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 08:06:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In that case, should the bug actually be downgraded?
It's already closed, I don't think we should care about that anymore.
It is still an RC bug for etch, but let's consider this RC as a bug
about all the security
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:19:55AM +0100, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 08:06:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In that case, should the bug actually be downgraded?
It's already closed, I don't think we should care about that anymore.
It is
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 08:06:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
The codebase is the same as the one for iceape and icedove currently in
unstable... the only difference is the way it is linked altogether in a
single big dynamic library instead of a single big binary program.
Yeah, I've
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:56:40AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 08:06:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
The codebase is the same as the one for iceape and icedove currently in
unstable... the only difference is the way it is linked altogether in a
single big
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 10:46:52PM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:19:55AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 08:06:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
In that case, should the bug actually be downgraded?
It's
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 09:18:54PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
- xulrunner has 2 RC bugs that I'll fix this week-end. I don't know if
#405062 applies to stable libnspr4. Well, it does apply, but I don't
know if there are other packages that provide setuid or setgid
programs using
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
We're now down to 1 RC bug it seems, but this is still outstanding. I had
heard from other members of the release team that an upload was expected
this weekend, but that appears not to have happened. Since there seems to
be a consensus that
7 matches
Mail list logo
