Hi,
* The Anarcat [2010-09-22 00:32]:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 01:16:39AM +0300, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
[...]
> > * would set a weird precedent for errata that did not come about in
> > fixing a security-related bug
>
> The regression was introduce by fixing a security-related bug which was
>
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 01:16:39AM +0300, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> (+cc: previous participants)
>
> The Anarcat wrote:
>
> > I understand that, but how does that keep us from issuing [an]
> > update on security.debian.org?
> [...]
> > People running stable are not necessarily running volatile and
(+cc: previous participants)
The Anarcat wrote:
> I understand that, but how does that keep us from issuing [an]
> update on security.debian.org?
[...]
> People running stable are not necessarily running volatile and s-p-u.
Ah, I missed your point before. Keeping git broken in lenny is indeed
a
Hi,
Philipp Kern wrote on Tue, 7 Sep 2010 01:43:09 +0200:
> I scheduled a binNMU. A quick fix is to upgrade to the version in
> proposed-updates when it's available there latest tomorrow evening.
The binNMU is on the mirrors in proposed-updates for a few days now
and it works as expected.
Will
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 03:48:37PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Philipp Kern wrote on Tue, 7 Sep 2010 01:43:09 +0200:
> > I scheduled a binNMU. A quick fix is to upgrade to the version in
> > proposed-updates when it's available there latest tomorrow evening.
>
> The binNMU is on the mirrors in p
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 15:48:37 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Will it come to stable only with the next minor release in a few
> months or will there be an earlier propagation to stable?
>
stable doesn't change outside of point releases (that would break
Release.gpg, for one thing).
Cheers,
Juli
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 10:55:32PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Thanks for the bug report. Indeed the git-core package is broken on
> > lenny/i386 since the last point release on Saturday. Sadly nobody caught
> > that bug when the package was in proposed-updates.
Hi Philipp,
Philipp Kern wrote:
> Thanks for the bug report. Indeed the git-core package is broken on
> lenny/i386 since the last point release on Saturday. Sadly nobody caught
> that bug when the package was in proposed-updates. It's only i386, that's
> affected, because of oddities on the up
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 12:56:05AM -0500, Adam Mercer wrote:
> Since the last update of git-core the templates in /usr/share/git-core are
> marked with permissions -rw-r- (owned by root:root), so general users
> can't access them. Therefore when a new repository is cloned the process
> failed a
9 matches
Mail list logo
