Bug#707219: release.debian.org: check co-installability of standard

2016-01-12 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:38:05 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 08 May 2013, Julien Cristau wrote: > > britney doesn't currently check that required+important+standard > > packages are all co-installable. It might be a good idea to add a > > faux-package to check that? > >

Bug#707219: release.debian.org: check co-installability of standard

2016-01-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Wed, 08 May 2013, Julien Cristau wrote: > britney doesn't currently check that required+important+standard > packages are all co-installable. It might be a good idea to add a > faux-package to check that? This check would probably have avoided #810785 where ifupdown 0.8.6 entered testing

Bug#707219: release.debian.org: check co-installability of standard

2013-05-12 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 15:28:44 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: If we do actually obtain this state where we can say that = standard packages are always (co)installable in testing, it will open up some new possible ways of optimizing Britney. E.g. we would be able to answer

Bug#707219: release.debian.org: check co-installability of standard

2013-05-12 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-05-12 11:48, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 15:28:44 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: If we do actually obtain this state where we can say that = standard packages are always (co)installable in testing, it will open up some new possible ways of optimizing Britney. E.g. we

Bug#707219: release.debian.org: check co-installability of standard

2013-05-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:52 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: I like the idea. I am thinking we could (at excuse time) reject packages with a breaks/conflicts on priority:optional or higher (unless the package is priority:extra). Is the optional / extra split actually well enough defined these days

Bug#707219: release.debian.org: check co-installability of standard

2013-05-11 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-05-11 14:42, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:52 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: I like the idea. I am thinking we could (at excuse time) reject packages with a breaks/conflicts on priority:optional or higher (unless the package is priority:extra). Is the optional /

Bug#707219: release.debian.org: check co-installability of standard

2013-05-08 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney Heya, britney doesn't currently check that required+important+standard packages are all co-installable. It might be a good idea to add a faux-package to check that? Cheers, Julien

Bug#707219: release.debian.org: check co-installability of standard

2013-05-08 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-05-08 11:59, Julien Cristau wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney Heya, britney doesn't currently check that required+important+standard packages are all co-installable. It might be a good idea to