Re: Iceape removal

2009-02-02 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On 2009-01-28, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote: Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Luk Claes wrote: Do you also take care of documenting this in the Release Notes? I'll do that in the next days. Ok, thanks! I've filed a bug against release-notes. Do the now obsolete binary packages (like

Re: Iceape removal

2009-02-02 Thread Luk Claes
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On 2009-01-28, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote: Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Luk Claes wrote: Do you also take care of documenting this in the Release Notes? I'll do that in the next days. Ok, thanks! I've filed a bug against release-notes. Do the now obsolete

Re: Iceape removal

2009-02-02 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:03:36PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On 2009-01-28, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote: Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Luk Claes wrote: Do you also take care of documenting this in the Release Notes? I'll do that in the next days. Ok, thanks!

Re: Iceape removal

2009-02-02 Thread Luk Claes
Mike Hommey wrote: On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:03:36PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On 2009-01-28, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote: Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Luk Claes wrote: Do you also take care of documenting this in the Release Notes? I'll do that in the next days.

Re: Iceape removal

2009-02-02 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 10:34:07PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: Mike Hommey wrote: On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:03:36PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On 2009-01-28, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote: Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Luk Claes wrote: Do you also take care of

Iceape removal

2009-01-28 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Hi, I've uploaded a NMU to fix #511477. Please unblock iceape/1.1.14-1.1 I've recompiled all packages build-depending on iceape-dev (including fun packages like gcj-4.[23], eclipse, openjdk and openoffice.org) and they all rebuild fine. The interdiff contain some buildsystem-generated, I'm