Re: Scheduling 9.5

On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 01:41 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adam D. Barratt (2018-07-11): > > All of the builds were accepted in time for the 13:52 dinstall, so > > everything should be in place for the dini upload. > > Right, I had seen the successful builds earlier but dinstall was > missing >

Re: Scheduling 9.5

Adam D. Barratt (2018-07-11): > All of the builds were accepted in time for the 13:52 dinstall, so > everything should be in place for the dini upload. Right, I had seen the successful builds earlier but dinstall was missing still; I've verified the build goes fine, included the patches for

Re: Scheduling 9.5

On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 06:52 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > If that upload gets accepted and built during the day, I can > > probably take care of dini this evening. > > Thanks; flagged for acceptance. All of the builds were accepted in time for the 13:52 dinstall, so everything should be in

Re: Scheduling 9.5

Hi, On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 06:11 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > In the end I've been out longer than I thought I would, so I only > managed to give it a go during the night. Being bugged by the > perspective of only build-testing d-i before the upload, I've gone > ahead with the whole “hack an

Re: Scheduling 9.5

Hi, Adam D. Barratt (2018-07-10): > On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 02:36 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > I'm not sure I'll be able to run tests (with a hacked archive due to > > the udebs being in s-p-u) before late evenings of Tuesday or > > Wednesday. > > Should I upload right away, so that we can

Re: Scheduling 9.5

Hi, On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 02:36 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Adam D. Barratt (2018-07-08): > > As with 8.11, there's been a kernel ABI bump for stretch since 9.4, > > so > > we'll need a source d-i upload in order to accommodate that. > > > > All of the expected uploads that

Re: Scheduling 9.5

Hi Adam, Adam D. Barratt (2018-07-08): > As with 8.11, there's been a kernel ABI bump for stretch since 9.4, so > we'll need a source d-i upload in order to accommodate that. > > All of the expected uploads that are relevant for d-i are already in > place, so please feel free to upload at a

Re: Scheduling 9.5

On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 20:16 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [Sorry, this got stuck in drafts] > > On Mon, 2018-06-25 at 22:06 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Adam D. Barratt (2018-06-25): > > > After some discussion on IRC, we've decided to go with the 14th > > > and > > > look at making the

Re: Scheduling 9.5

On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 23:00 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adam D. Barratt (2018-06-27): > > On Mon, 2018-06-25 at 22:06 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > Not that I have big plans right now, except maybe working on the > > > dini ftbfs within stretch (once the point release has happened), > >

Re: Scheduling 9.5

Adam D. Barratt (2018-06-27): > On Mon, 2018-06-25 at 22:06 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Not that I have big plans right now, except maybe working on the > > dini ftbfs within stretch (once the point release has happened), see > > #902226. > > Hmmm. While I can appreciate the sentiment, not

Re: Scheduling 9.5

[Sorry, this got stuck in drafts] On Mon, 2018-06-25 at 22:06 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adam D. Barratt (2018-06-25): > > After some discussion on IRC, we've decided to go with the 14th and > > look at making the press side more handleable for that date. > > So freezing on the 7st as

Re: Scheduling 9.5

Adam D. Barratt (2018-06-25): > After some discussion on IRC, we've decided to go with the 14th and > look at making the press side more handleable for that date. So freezing on the 7st as customary? Not that I have big plans right now, except maybe working on the dini ftbfs within stretch

Re: Scheduling 9.5

On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 18:00 +0200, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > > El 12 de junio de 2018 13:44:52 CEST, "Adam D. Barratt" rratt.org.uk> escribió: [...] > > - July 7th > > This we (publicity) can, and prefer it. > > > - July 14th > > This, could be possible, but only one of us is available.

Re: Scheduling 9.5

Hi, On Sat, 2018-06-23 at 17:30 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 12:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [...] > > Given all of the above, I think the sanest option is to concentrate > > on getting 8.11 done and jessie off our radar and then get 9.5 > > sorted. > > > > For

Re: Scheduling 9.5

On 15077 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> - July 7th >> - July 14th >> Are people available for either or both of those dates? > The 7th is looking like the favourite so far (although would mean > freezing next weekend), but we still need an ftp-master (N)ACK on > either / both date. No way

Re: Scheduling 9.5

On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 12:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > Given all of the above, I think the sanest option is to concentrate > on getting 8.11 done and jessie off our radar and then get 9.5 > sorted. > > For suggested dates for 9.5, we know that June 30th is a no-go, > Debcamp starts on

Re: Scheduling 9.5

Adam D. Barratt (2018-06-12): > Given all of the above, I think the sanest option is to concentrate on > getting 8.11 done and jessie off our radar and then get 9.5 sorted. > > For suggested dates for 9.5, we know that June 30th is a no-go, Debcamp > starts on July 21st and then Debconf on the

Re: Scheduling 9.5

El 12 de junio de 2018 13:44:52 CEST, "Adam D. Barratt" escribió: >On 2018-06-08 18:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> [Cc += debian-kernel] >> >> On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 12:04 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: >>> On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >[...] >> We're past any of the above by

Re: Scheduling 9.5

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:44:52PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >On 2018-06-08 18:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >Given all of the above, I think the sanest option is to concentrate on >getting 8.11 done and jessie off our radar and then get 9.5 sorted. > >For suggested dates for 9.5, we know that

Re: Scheduling 9.5

On 2018-06-08 18:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [Cc += debian-kernel] On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 12:04 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: [...] We're past any of the above by now, and while looking through the to-do list for the final jessie point release, I

Re: Scheduling 9.5

-kernel: any chance of a yes/no ASAP, please? On 2018-06-08 18:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [Cc += debian-kernel] On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 12:04 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >  - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a > big >  

Re: Scheduling 9.5

On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 18:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > We can either accept the packages and put up with the situation for a > short while, or do 9.5 before 8.11. In practical terms, that would > likely mean both 9.5 and 8.11 on June 23rd, freezing both next > weekend. Should be fine with

Re: Scheduling 9.5

El 8 de junio de 2018 19:51:18 CEST, "Adam D. Barratt" escribió: >[Cc += debian-kernel] > >On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 12:04 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: >> On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> >  - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a >> > big >> >  ask) >>

Re: Scheduling 9.5

On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 06:51:18PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >[Cc += debian-kernel] > >On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 12:04 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: >> On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> >  - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a >> > big >> >  ask) >> >> No. >>

Re: Scheduling 9.5

[Cc += debian-kernel] On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 12:04 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > >  - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a > > big > >  ask) > > No. > > >  - Jun 2nd (which may require an unusual SRM) > > Possible. > >

Re: Scheduling 9.5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 15:44 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Context: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/merge_requests/30 > > Many thanks for the heads-up. I'll be on the lookout for a possible > late ABI bump then. Feel free to poke me

Re: Scheduling 9.5

Hi Salvatore, Salvatore Bonaccorso (2018-06-05): > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:49:46PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > I don't think we have any pending ABI bump for linux (this time), and > > the stretch branch in debian-installer.git seems quiet, so binNMUing d-i > > might be sufficient. I

Re: Scheduling 9.5

Hi Cyril, On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:49:46PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Heya, > > Jonathan Wiltshire (2018-05-14): > > We're due a point release any day now. Please indicate your > > availablility out of: > > > > - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a big > >

Re: Scheduling 9.5

On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a big > ask) No. > - Jun 2nd (which may require an unusual SRM) Possible. > - Jun 9th (getting quite a way out of cadence, but maybe that can't be >helped) Possible. --

Re: Scheduling 9.5

Hello Sorry for the delay in answering El 14/05/18 a las 19:19, Jonathan Wiltshire escribió: > Hi, > > We're due a point release any day now. Please indicate your availablility > out of: > > - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a big ask) > - Jun 2nd (which may

Re: Scheduling 9.5

Heya, Jonathan Wiltshire (2018-05-14): > We're due a point release any day now. Please indicate your > availablility out of: > > - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a big >ask) > - Jun 2nd (which may require an unusual SRM) > - Jun 9th (getting

Re: Scheduling 9.5

On Mon, 14, May, 2018 at 06:19:00PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire spoke thus.. > Hi, > > We're due a point release any day now. Please indicate your availablility > out of: > > - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a big ask) > - Jun 2nd (which may require an unusual SRM)

Re: Scheduling 9.5

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:19:00PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >Hi, > >We're due a point release any day now. Please indicate your availablility >out of: > > - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a big ask) Awkward, but doable. > - Jun 2nd (which may require an

Re: Scheduling 9.5

and now without the typo in KiBi's address *sigh* On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 20:55 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [CC += KiBi] > > On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 18:19 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > We're due a point release any day now. Please indicate your > > availablility > > out of: > > > >  -

Re: Scheduling 9.5

[CC += KiBi] On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 18:19 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > We're due a point release any day now. Please indicate your > availablility > out of: > >  - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a big > ask) >  - Jun 2nd (which may require an unusual SRM) >  -