Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-28 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Fri, September 28, 2012 07:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Is adding the epoch any more involved than just changing the version number, from a packaging point of view? If not, then doing that today would indeed be one way out of the issue, depending on your opinion of doing so, with your

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 28.09.2012 07:55, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Fri, September 28, 2012 07:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Is adding the epoch any more involved than just changing the version number, from a packaging point of view? If not, then doing that today would indeed be one way out of the issue, depending

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:53 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Wed, September 26, 2012 11:02, Philipp Kern wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are in. [...] ok, please upload as soon as possible

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-27 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Thu, September 27, 2012 20:52, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:53 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Wed, September 26, 2012 11:02, Philipp Kern wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 22:10 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Thu, September 27, 2012 20:52, Adam D. Barratt wrote: a) prop-up the packages from p-u to testing (meh) and unstable (bad) during the point release b) exclude ia32-libs from the point release (not ideal) c) get a newer (well,

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-27 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Thu, September 27, 2012 22:38, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 22:10 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Thu, September 27, 2012 20:52, Adam D. Barratt wrote: a) prop-up the packages from p-u to testing (meh) and unstable (bad) during the point release b) exclude ia32-libs

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 06:56 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Thu, September 27, 2012 22:38, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 22:10 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Thu, September 27, 2012 20:52, Adam D. Barratt wrote: a) prop-up the packages from p-u to testing (meh) and

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-26 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Mon, September 17, 2012 15:58, Philipp Kern wrote: ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are in. The other two ia32-libs-* do not

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-26 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are in. The other two ia32-libs-* do not require an update in this release. Attached is the proposed changelog entry. Let me know when I can upload. ok, please

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-26 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Wed, September 26, 2012 11:02, Philipp Kern wrote: Hi, On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are in. The other two ia32-libs-* do not require an update in this release. Attached is the proposed

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 26.09.2012 11:53, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Wed, September 26, 2012 11:02, Philipp Kern wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are in. The other two ia32-libs-* do not require an update in this

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-24 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 09/23/2012 06:40 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Any comment from -live? 29th is fine. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 09:01 +0900, dann frazier wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well. There don't seem to be any new d-i changes in git, so I assume we just need lkdi, a round of d-i binNMUs and then

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-24 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:54:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 09:01 +0900, dann frazier wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well. There don't seem to be any new d-i changes in

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 11:30 -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side [...] Sorry, been travelling

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 15:59 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side We still need a press officer for

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-23 Thread Neil Williams
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:59:09 +0200 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side We still need a

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-23 Thread dann frazier
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 11:30 -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-18 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: Hi, ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 21:43 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: I'd like to arrange a point release to be done as soon as feasible. So I'd like to propose a bunch of weekends here: * Sep 22/23: I'm personally busy on the 23th * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side This is looking like the favourite so far,

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: Hi, I'd like to arrange a point release to be done as soon as feasible. So I'd like to propose a bunch of weekends here: * Sep 22/23: I'm personally busy on the 23th Available that weekend fine. * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-11 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 12962 March 1977, Philipp Kern wrote: I'd like to arrange a point release to be done as soon as feasible. So I'd like to propose a bunch of weekends here: * Sep 22/23: I'm personally busy on the 23th Right after the ftpmaster meeting. Might work. * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side Works for