Your message dated Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:10:12 +0100
with message-id <56a79a64.5070...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#812536: nmu: suitesparse transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #812536,
regarding nmu: suitesparse transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-julia-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Release Team,
Please schedule binNMUs for the ongoing suitesparse transition
(https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto
in the way of the suitesparse transition. This move made
octave3.0 uninstallable in sid, on all architectures.
Erm, but that could have been handled by binNMUs, surely? (Which I had
already scheduled, and which had already been successfully built on several
archs...)
Sure, it could. I took
On 31/03/2008, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Sure, it could. I took the opportunity to do some fixes and fix
Bug#473438, which were pending in SVN. Have you announced the binNMus
somewhere? I probably missed the announcement.
As always,
* Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-27 10:19]:
Sorry, needed a new OOo upload because
[snip]
I just did the upload of octave3.0 3.0.0-10, which will also delay the
transition. This upload was necessary because the libhdf5 1.6.5 - 1.6.6
transition came in the way of the suitesparse
the libhdf5 1.6.5 - 1.6.6
transition came in the way of the suitesparse transition. This move made
octave3.0 uninstallable in sid, on all architectures.
Erm, but that could have been handled by binNMUs, surely? (Which I had
already scheduled, and which had already been successfully built
* Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-27 10:19]:
Sorry, needed a new OOo upload because
- it fixes a important calc calculation bug which we should not impose
on testing
- it most probably wouldn't have gone in anyway without disabling the
build on arm
- openoffice.org-voikko
* Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-20 16:06]:
I uploaded new spooles and petsc this morning. Spooles has built
successfully on arm. petsc was tried on hppa, but failed because of
missing lam. lam has not failed on hppa, but 7.1.2-1.3 has not been
attempted; same with armel.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Torsten Werner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the shogun developer (Sören) is still on vacation but I will contact him
ASAP.
Shogun has now been built on all important architectures except hppa
where the buildd is very slow. I do not know what we can do here.
* Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-20 22:43]:
* Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-20 16:06]:
One other note: libmesh and petsc4py may need to be rebuilt after petsc
goes in, didn't see those on your igloo. Let me know if you want to
bin-NMU them; otherwise I will
- /usr/bin/octave-config-2.1.71
That is fully broken. Who can be contacted about the problem?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/01/msg01589.html
Could someone please give shogun back on arm, hoping that cats will not pick
it up? This is blocking both the suitesparse transition
* Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-22 20:49]:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone please give shogun back on arm, hoping that cats will not
pick
it up?
I did a binary only upload because cats did pick it up.
Great,
Hi,
please see
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=shogunarch=armver=0.5.1-1stamp=1205965767file=logas=raw:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 May 23 2007 /etc/alternatives/octave-config
- /usr/bin/octave-config-2.1.71
That is fully broken. Who can be contacted about the problem?
Cheers,
Torsten
On 20/03/08 09:19 +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
Hi,
please see
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=shogunarch=armver=0.5.1-1stamp=1205965767file=logas=raw:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 May 23 2007 /etc/alternatives/octave-config
- /usr/bin/octave-config-2.1.71
That is fully broken.
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 22:52 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 20:29 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Adam Powell uploaded version 2.3.3-7 of petsc that build-depends
alternatively on liopenmpi-dev or lam4-dev. This should fix the Dep-Wait
status on some arches, like arm,
* Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-20 16:06]:
I uploaded new spooles and petsc this morning. Spooles has built
successfully on arm. petsc was tried on hppa, but failed because of
missing lam. lam has not failed on hppa, but 7.1.2-1.3 has not been
attempted; same with armel.
Dear maintainers,
The suitesparse transition is involving a quite large number of packages. I
prepared an igloo URL [1] with the ones I think are involved. Please,
correct me if I am wrong. The mips arch seems to be the main blocker now,
followed by hppa. The arm, mipsel, and s390 arches have
Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The suitesparse transition is involving a quite large number of packages. I
prepared an igloo URL [1] with the ones I think are involved. Please,
correct me if I am wrong. The mips arch seems to be the main blocker now,
followed by hppa. The arm
Hi,
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The suitesparse transition is involving a quite large number of packages. I
prepared an igloo URL [1] with the ones I think are involved. Please,
correct me if I am wrong. The mips arch seems to be the main
Hi Rafael,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The suitesparse transition is involving a quite large number of packages.
I
prepared an igloo URL [1] with the ones I think are involved. Please,
correct me if I am wrong
[shogun]
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But given that arm and mips(el) FTBFSed anyway...
the shogun developer (Sören) is still on vacation but I will contact him ASAP.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
http://twerner.blogspot.com
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The suitesparse transition is involving a quite large number of
packages. I
prepared an igloo URL [1] with the ones I think are involved. Please,
correct me if I am wrong
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rafael,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The suitesparse transition is involving a quite large number of
packages. I
prepared an igloo
* Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-19 16:21]:
And python-scipy FTBFSes on mips...
Reported as Bug#471549 today. The maintainer replied already and (I hope) a
fix is in its way.
--
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 04:58:51PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
And python-scipy FTBFSes on mips...
python-scipy FTBFSes everywhere, not just mips. The problem is that
pycentral has moved some files recently. I am about to fix this this
evening.
Do you think that this will also cause
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Philipp Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 04:58:51PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
And python-scipy FTBFSes on mips...
python-scipy FTBFSes everywhere, not just mips. The problem is that
pycentral has moved some files recently. I am
On 19/03/08 13:11 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The suitesparse transition is involving a quite large number of packages. I
prepared an igloo URL [1] with the ones I think are involved. Please,
correct me if I am wrong. The mips arch
Philipp Kern writes:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 04:58:51PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
And python-scipy FTBFSes on mips...
python-scipy FTBFSes everywhere, not just mips. The problem is that
pycentral has moved some files recently. I am about to fix this this
evening.
Do you think that
Thomas Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 19/03/08 13:11 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
shogun_0.5.1-1 FTBFSed on arm
Please give shogun back on ARM, latest octave3.0 should fix that. Sorry
for mipsel, no idea.
Done.
Marc
--
BOFH #16:
somebody was calculating pi on the server
Adam Powell uploaded version 2.3.3-7 of petsc that build-depends
alternatively on liopenmpi-dev or lam4-dev. This should fix the Dep-Wait
status on some arches, like arm, mips, mipsel, and s390.
Will the autobuilds automatically happen on these arches or should the
package be given back on
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 20:29 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Adam Powell uploaded version 2.3.3-7 of petsc that build-depends
alternatively on liopenmpi-dev or lam4-dev. This should fix the Dep-Wait
status on some arches, like arm, mips, mipsel, and s390.
Will the autobuilds automatically
31 matches
Mail list logo
