Re: bugzilla 2.18-6, sarge candidate

2005-05-08 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote: Users ask for many things that it's not feasible for us to give them. The fact is that the diff between 2.16.7-5 and 2.18-6 is 197,000 lines I totally agree that RMs have your procedures, and I believe that I cannot change your decision

Re: bugzilla 2.18-6, sarge candidate

2005-05-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 12:17:00PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote: Hi, the bugzilla 2.18-5 package currently in unstable has a RC bug which is not reported in the BTS: postinst uses ucf and there's no dependendcy against ucf in debian/control. I made a 2.18-6 package which fixes that problem.

Re: bugzilla 2.18-6, sarge candidate

2005-05-05 Thread Alexis Sukrieh
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : Do you think we could upload this 2.18-6 package to sarge? Only if you can explain why it's justified in terms of the version that's currently in testing. Well, the version currently in testing is the previous upstream release of bugzilla: