Hi,
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 11:03:38 +0200
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Adding the w3af maintainer to recipients.
Thanks.
Today, I've put pysvn and svn-workbench to unstable. I'll stay it for
1 or 2 weeks.
Adding the w3af maintainer to recipients.
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 09:55:50 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Hi,
Have you tested the reverse dependencies with the new
version (seems to be svn-workbench, svn-load, , ibid,
There's no reply from w3af maintainer so I've investigated it
Hi,
Have you tested the reverse dependencies with the new
version (seems to be svn-workbench, svn-load, , ibid,
There's no reply from w3af maintainer so I've investigated it and
there is not a problem with updating pysvn. w3af uses pysvn for update
only, and its feature shouldn't
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 08:14:56 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Hi,
I've fixed RC bug #678559 as introducing new upstream release.
This debdiff is huge, however, most of the code is able to be ignored.
- Some of them are for Win32 and MacOSX, we can ignore it.
- Rest of them are PyCXX
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:57:39 +0200
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
OK, ignoring the tests and pycxx changes the diff looks relatively
reasonable.
Thanks to check, it's really help.
Have you tested the reverse dependencies with the new
version (seems to be svn-workbench,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 04:14:43 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Have you tested the reverse dependencies with the new
version (seems to be svn-workbench, svn-load, , ibid,
w3af-console)?
Not yet, honestly.
So, I should ask others to help this migration with upgraded pysvn
by
6 matches
Mail list logo
